Some Somewhat Easier n^i Sequences Available for Termination - Page 81

gd_barnes · 2022-09-26, 14:48

347^61 terminates

Only 1 remaining on base 347.

I'm done with the base.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-27, 01:53

63^91 terminates

An unexpected one that dropped surprisingly quickly after cracking a C131 at index 3. That's our 3rd one from the index 1 effort.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-27, 02:34

I should have waited 30 mins to post that last one. I got another unexpectedly quick one. I won't edit the last post since the 1st post in this thread was updated with it.

780^52 terminates

After splitting the C141 at index 3 and then a quick C119 on index 4, ECM took care of the remaining hard stuff.

That makes 4 terminations from the index 1 effort.

That's all I'll do on base 780.

63^91 is shown terminated in the 1st post but it looks like the 347^61 termination was missed.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-27, 10:25

284^64 terminates

#5 from the index 1 effort.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-28, 02:23

66^92 terminates

gd_barnes · 2022-09-29, 05:46

828^52 terminates

Like 780^52, this one was both a new base and in the index 1 sidebar. That makes 7 terminations from index 1.

I'm still doing a small amount of work on base 828 but I don't expect any more terminations.

gd_barnes · 2022-10-01, 08:22

I'm not sure if you want to list it here:

233^67 was terminated by Suika and stated in the other thread.

gd_barnes · 2022-10-01, 11:16

696^56 terminates

You may also want to list your termination of 996^58 from the index 1 thread in post 1 here.

With both of these from index 1, that makes 9 terminations from that effort.

EdH · 2022-10-01, 12:51

I haven't been running base 233 in my scripts since it was claimed as reserved, so it won't show up unless I add it manually. I'll add 888, 996 and 1264460 to this thread (even though they don't have tables yet) and credit you with the termination, since you did have it reserved by post. I have the update scripts running right now. This thread's updating takes more work than the index 1 thread, which is now only a couple steps.

EdH · 2022-10-01, 15:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

. . . and credit you with the termination, since you did have it reserved by post.

. . .

Actually, thinking more about this, Jean-Luc had it reserved by base in the main project and sub-let it to the index 1 effort for that index only. The termination was consequential, so I'm actually thinking we should credit him for any such terminations.

For now, I'm not including 888, 996 or 1264460 in this thread because they haven't been released by Jean-Luc for anything but index 1 work.

I'm currently looking at rewrites for my scipts, so it may be a bit before I update post #1.

garambois · 2022-10-01, 16:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

For now, I'm not including 888, 996 or 1264460 in this thread because they haven't been released by Jean-Luc for anything but index 1 work.

Thank you, it's safer that way.
But if you absolutely insist on already working on these bases, please don't touch the following exponents :
Base 888, even exponents <48, odd exponents <35.
Base 996, even exponents <50, odd exponents <33.
Base 1264460, even exponents <24, odd exponents <17.
No worries for the upper exponents, I didn't do any work on them.

2022-09-27, 02:34	#883
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11,807 Posts	I should have waited 30 mins to post that last one. I got another unexpectedly quick one. I won't edit the last post since the 1st post in this thread was updated with it. 780^52 terminates After splitting the C141 at index 3 and then a quick C119 on index 4, ECM took care of the remaining hard stuff. That makes 4 terminations from the index 1 effort. That's all I'll do on base 780. 63^91 is shown terminated in the 1st post but it looks like the 347^61 termination was missed. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-09-27 at 03:10

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1	Miszka	Software	22	2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation	mathPuzzles	Math	8	2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...	xtreme2k	Math	34	2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime?	EdH	Aliquot Sequences	6	2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k	10metreh	Aliquot Sequences	0	2010-03-11 18:24

2022-09-26, 14:48	#881
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11,807 Posts	347^61 terminates Only 1 remaining on base 347. I'm done with the base.

2022-09-27, 01:53	#882
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11807₁₀ Posts	63^91 terminates An unexpected one that dropped surprisingly quickly after cracking a C131 at index 3. That's our 3rd one from the index 1 effort.

2022-09-27, 10:25	#884
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11,807 Posts	284^64 terminates #5 from the index 1 effort.

2022-09-28, 02:23	#885
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11,807 Posts	66^92 terminates

2022-09-29, 05:46	#886
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 2E1F₁₆ Posts	828^52 terminates Like 780^52, this one was both a new base and in the index 1 sidebar. That makes 7 terminations from index 1. I'm still doing a small amount of work on base 828 but I don't expect any more terminations.

2022-10-01, 08:22	#887
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 11,807 Posts	I'm not sure if you want to list it here: 233^67 was terminated by Suika and stated in the other thread.

2022-10-01, 11:16	#888
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 27037₈ Posts	696^56 terminates You may also want to list your termination of 996^58 from the index 1 thread in post 1 here. With both of these from index 1, that makes 9 terminations from that effort.

2022-10-01, 12:51	#889
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 5,227 Posts	I haven't been running base 233 in my scripts since it was claimed as reserved, so it won't show up unless I add it manually. I'll add 888, 996 and 1264460 to this thread (even though they don't have tables yet) and credit you with the termination, since you did have it reserved by post. I have the update scripts running right now. This thread's updating takes more work than the index 1 thread, which is now only a couple steps.