Some Somewhat Easier n^i Sequences Available for Termination - Page 80

gd_barnes · 2022-09-23, 13:28

331^59 terminates

337^51, 53, 55, and 61 terminate

Still working on these two bases.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-23, 15:27

331^61 terminates

Only 2 to go on base 331.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-24, 03:31

337^57 and 337^59 terminate

Only 2 to go on base 337.

I am working on 331^65. That is the only remaining work that I'm doing on bases 331/337.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-24, 19:34

331^65 terminates

Only 1 remaining on base 331. :-)

I'm done with bases 331/337.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-25, 06:44

347^49, 51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate

349^51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate

I'm working on new bases 347 and 349 as well as 21^121.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-25, 12:08

51^99 terminates

349^57 terminates

51^99 is the first termination as a result of the index 1 effort. As of a day ago, there were 15 same-parity changes as a result of that effort. I've worked on all of them and 3 of them are interesting: The one above and these two:

21^121: 142/135/3; I'm working on.

24^118: 163/163/(none); No known factor at t45!

Ed, are you interested in taking a hack at the C163? :-)

EdH · 2022-09-25, 12:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

. . .
Ed, are you interested in taking a hack at the C163? :-)

It interests me, but my GPU machine is corrupting its drive continuously. I can't tell if it's the drive or the computer. mprime runs fine for hours. Swapping drives is an option, but it includes other work needed reinstalling all the packages to match the hardware.

The GPU would run LA on the c163 in about 1.5 hours, while the CPU machine would take about 6.

I guess I've gotten "spoiled" running this GPU.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-26, 11:22

21^121, 347^57, and 347^65 terminate

21^121 is the 2nd termination from the index 1 effort.

I'm still working on 347^61. 347 currently has 2 remaining.

I'm done with 349. It has 3 remaining. I haven't previously taken on a C145 but I might take on 349^61 at 150/145/193/full later on. Other things are in the pipe right now.

I'm also working on 780^52 for new base 780. I'm taking on the C141. The 4 sequences above that are tough. Jean-Luc did a lot of work on it. I would have done this one anyway since it's a new base but it was also on the index 1 list so it should be the 3rd termination from that effort.

EdH · 2022-09-26, 12:25

I'm going to be testing my db limits in a bit by updating the index 1 thread, this one and my local set.

I've also got to modify my current script. It worked a sequence that was already past index 1 last night, that it didn't need to.

gd_barnes · 2022-09-26, 12:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

I've also got to modify my current script. It worked a sequence that was already past index 1 last night, that it didn't need to.

Clarification: Was it already at index >= 2 when you started working on it or did it start at index 1 and then continue working on past it?

I'm asking because when I noticed you'd split one of those same-parity C138-139-140's, I'd fairly quickly run it through my usual process. So if it was the latter of the two above, it could have been my work on it past index 1.

EdH · 2022-09-26, 12:52

Actually, I was mistaken (yet again). I thought I was working in the c130s and I have made it into the c140s. I will reset and see where I'm at after my update.

2022-09-23, 13:28	#870
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 3³×439 Posts	331^59 terminates 337^51, 53, 55, and 61 terminate Still working on these two bases. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-09-23 at 14:09

2022-09-25, 06:44	#874
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 3³·439 Posts	347^49, 51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate 349^51, 53, 55, and 59 terminate I'm working on new bases 347 and 349 as well as 21^121. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-09-25 at 07:26

2022-09-26, 11:22	#877
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 3³×439 Posts	21^121, 347^57, and 347^65 terminate 21^121 is the 2nd termination from the index 1 effort. I'm still working on 347^61. 347 currently has 2 remaining. I'm done with 349. It has 3 remaining. I haven't previously taken on a C145 but I might take on 349^61 at 150/145/193/full later on. Other things are in the pipe right now. I'm also working on 780^52 for new base 780. I'm taking on the C141. The 4 sequences above that are tough. Jean-Luc did a lot of work on it. I would have done this one anyway since it's a new base but it was also on the index 1 list so it should be the 3rd termination from that effort. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-09-26 at 11:25

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Unexpected termination of PM-1	Miszka	Software	22	2021-11-19 21:36
Easier pi(x) approximation	mathPuzzles	Math	8	2017-05-04 10:58
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...	xtreme2k	Math	34	2013-09-09 23:54
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime?	EdH	Aliquot Sequences	6	2010-04-06 00:12
A new termination below 100k	10metreh	Aliquot Sequences	0	2010-03-11 18:24

2022-09-23, 15:27	#871
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 27115₈ Posts	331^61 terminates Only 2 to go on base 331.

2022-09-24, 03:31	#872
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 3³×439 Posts	337^57 and 337^59 terminate Only 2 to go on base 337. I am working on 331^65. That is the only remaining work that I'm doing on bases 331/337.

2022-09-24, 19:34	#873
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 3³×439 Posts	331^65 terminates Only 1 remaining on base 331. :-) I'm done with bases 331/337.

2022-09-25, 12:08	#875
gd_barnes "Gary" May 2007 Overland Park, KS 10111001001101₂ Posts	51^99 terminates 349^57 terminates 51^99 is the first termination as a result of the index 1 effort. As of a day ago, there were 15 same-parity changes as a result of that effort. I've worked on all of them and 3 of them are interesting: The one above and these two: 21^121: 142/135/3; I'm working on. 24^118: 163/163/(none); No known factor at t45! Ed, are you interested in taking a hack at the C163? :-)

2022-09-26, 12:25	#878
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 12215₈ Posts	I'm going to be testing my db limits in a bit by updating the index 1 thread, this one and my local set. I've also got to modify my current script. It worked a sequence that was already past index 1 last night, that it didn't need to.

2022-09-26, 12:52	#880
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 5,261 Posts	Actually, I was mistaken (yet again). I thought I was working in the c130s and I have made it into the c140s. I will reset and see where I'm at after my update.