mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-12-26, 23:40   #23
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

141418 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
Taking/running 3600-3800G on two cores in Ubuntu 64bit.


I am getting little/no speed increase over 32bit Windows. Where can I get details of CPU speed/temps etc? How do I assign affinity to each core?
Hmm...that's weird. Are you sure you downloaded the sr2sieve version labeled "x86_64" for Linux instead of the one labeled just "x86"? Otherwise you may be in fact running the 32-bit Linux version under 64-bit Ubuntu--which would explain why you're not seeing any speed increase. There should be about a 2x increase in the p/sec. rate for 64-bit vs. 32-bit.

As for affinity: try running the command ./sr2sieve -h in your sr2sieve directory. That's the same as "sr2sieve -h" on Windows; it will give you a complete listing of all the command line flags that sr2sieve supports, including ones that set affinity.

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-12-26 at 23:41
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 00:01   #24
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

B2416 Posts
Default

Okay, the scoreboard seems to be correct SO,

I'll take 4250 - 5850. That should fill me up till about the Jan 16th.
MyDogBuster is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 00:25   #25
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3×7×487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
Okay, the scoreboard seems to be correct SO,

I'll take 4250 - 5850. That should fill me up till about the Jan 16th.

I now have you down for the entire range of 4050 - 5850.
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 01:26   #26
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31·67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Hmm...that's weird. Are you sure you downloaded the sr2sieve version labeled "x86_64" for Linux instead of the one labeled just "x86"? ....
It was the 64bit version from the link you provided. I assume if I've accidentally installed 32bit Ubuntu, 64 bit sr2sieve wouldn't run at all?
Flatlander is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 01:31   #27
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default

Quote:
I now have you down for the entire range of 4050 - 5850.
That's right. It's a mess. I can still get about 400G for my original 2 cores, but I'll hold off on that to see how everything goes.
MyDogBuster is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 01:49   #28
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

792 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
It was the 64bit version from the link you provided. I assume if I've accidentally installed 32bit Ubuntu, 64 bit sr2sieve wouldn't run at all?
You are correct--32-bit Ubuntu would not run 64-bit sr2sieve at all. And I just verified that the link I posted *is* for the latest 64-bit version of sr2sieve--so I have absolutely no idea why it's acting this way for you.

I would suggest posting about your situation in this thread, which is where Geoff usually posts general information about the sr*sieve programs. Maybe he'll know what's going on here.
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 03:30   #29
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31×67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
You are correct--32-bit Ubuntu would not run 64-bit sr2sieve at all. And I just verified that the link I posted *is* for the latest 64-bit version of sr2sieve--so I have absolutely no idea why it's acting this way for you.

I would suggest posting about your situation in this thread, which is where Geoff usually posts general information about the sr*sieve programs. Maybe he'll know what's going on here.
Is there some way I can get a reading of the speed I'm running at. (In Ubuntu not in the BIOS.) I've downloaded "Device Manager" but it just tells me the stock speed.
Flatlander is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 06:31   #30
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

792 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
Is there some way I can get a reading of the speed I'm running at. (In Ubuntu not in the BIOS.) I've downloaded "Device Manager" but it just tells me the stock speed.
Okay, right-click on one of your taskbars (the upper taskbar is better for this since adding gadgets there won't hog room from your active-window buttons), and click Add to Panel. Locate the CPU Frequency Scaling Monitor in the list that comes up, and click Add to Panel twice (once for each core). Then right-click on the second gadget that you just added and click Properties; set it to report the frequency for CPU 1 (the other should be left at the default, CPU 0). That should tell you what speed your CPU is currently running at.

If it's running lower than it should, you can use the CPU Frequency Scaling Monitors to fix this. Open a terminal window, and run the command "sudo dpkg-reconfigure gnome-applets" (without quotes). Enter your password when prompted. It will ask you whether or not to allow the cpufreq-selector applet to have root privileges; select Yes and press Enter. You will be dumped back at the terminal prompt; now close the terminal.

Now, if you left-click on the applet, you'll see options to manually set the CPU to a particular frequency, as well as multiple predefined settings (referred to as "governors")--namely, "Conservative", "Ondemand", "Performance", and "Powersave". Choose either the highest clock speed level, or the "Performance" governor, and you should be in business.

Hope this helps!

Max
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 07:13   #31
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

40358 Posts
Default

Thanks Max.
That showed me that it was running at stock (1.8GHz) instead of 2.38GHz. For some reason the BIOS had reset the speed when I rebooted.
I'm now getting slightly better p/sec than my quad @ 3.15Ghz.

So 64bit is running about 33% faster than 32bit. (Maybe the caches are different. I'll check it out later.)
Flatlander is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 07:28   #32
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

792 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
Thanks Max.
That showed me that it was running at stock (1.8GHz) instead of 2.38GHz. For some reason the BIOS had reset the speed when I rebooted.
I'm now getting slightly better p/sec than my quad @ 3.15Ghz.

So 64bit is running about 33% faster than 32bit. (Maybe the caches are different. I'll check it out later.)
Okay, glad to hear you got it working. Though, I can't imagine how the caches would be different between operating systems...I would instead presume that the boost only being 33% is due entirely to the 64-bit system being clocked at 2.38Ghz rather than the 3.15Ghz 32-bit comparison machine.
mdettweiler is offline  
Old 2008-12-27, 08:16   #33
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

792 Posts
Default

Taking 5850G-5900G. I'll start this tomorrow (my 5th Drive range should finish overnight).
mdettweiler is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Team drive #10 k=1400-2000 n=500K-1M gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 61 2013-01-30 16:08
Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 236 2009-06-25 10:04
Sieving drive for k=1003-2000 n=500K-1M gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 160 2009-05-10 00:50
k=1005-1400 n=200K-500K results fill in gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 55 2009-04-16 11:33
Team drive #8 k=1400-2000 n=350K-500K gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 101 2009-04-08 02:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:17.

Thu Oct 29 08:17:22 UTC 2020 up 49 days, 5:28, 1 user, load averages: 1.75, 1.55, 1.49

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.