mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-04-12, 19:56   #1398
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

2,917 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rudi_m View Post
Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)
The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue.

He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.
Mark Rose is offline  
Old 2017-04-12, 20:39   #1399
ric
 
ric's Avatar
 
Jul 2004
Milan, Ita

B416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
I track them all until they have a matching residue.
Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?
ric is offline  
Old 2017-04-12, 20:39   #1400
rudi_m
 
rudi_m's Avatar
 
Jul 2005

18210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue.

He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.
Yes, all good. I just wanted to motivate Mad Poo, not blaming you! Actually I want to finish a lot of boring TF work right now unless interesting DC' are available ;)

Last fiddled with by rudi_m on 2017-04-12 at 21:05
rudi_m is offline  
Old 2017-04-12, 20:46   #1401
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

2,917 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ric View Post
Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?
No.

The ones that are fake primes, with C (composite) result with all-0 residues always need a TC.

Of the others, it really depends on the user/machine. MadPoo generally post lists where at least half the results produced by a machine are bad, which should mean that at least half the exponents need a TC.
Mark Rose is offline  
Old 2017-04-12, 21:00   #1402
rudi_m
 
rudi_m's Avatar
 
Jul 2005

2·7·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ric View Post
Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?
This would be really interesting!

Regarding my own stats, I've made 75% (377/492) "successful double checks" last year. Since I've made also some "normal" DC's I would estimate the real rate regarding this thread about 60%. This means that the chance to discover a prime by strategic DC might be similar to "normal" LL (if you choose the smaller/faster exponents only).

Last fiddled with by rudi_m on 2017-04-12 at 21:03
rudi_m is offline  
Old 2017-04-13, 03:48   #1403
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×5,059 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rudi_m View Post
Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)
I agree. I just ran a >70M exponent, but that was for a specific request. Smaller is certainly better at advancing the wave front by completing small ranges just over the definitively completed DC range. I am much more likely to pick up lower hanging fruit, if I get the chance. Most of my work goes through GPU72, though.
kladner is offline  
Old 2017-04-13, 20:53   #1404
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue.

He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.
Yeah, I like working the smaller exponents too... it's fun to speculate there's a hidden prime somewhere below 60M or so.

I will try and get a new list soon. For fun the other day, I looked at the DC's below 40M that were still unassigned and using my stats, I picked the top 10 most likely to have been done wrong the first time and even though we're talking about bad/good ratios of like 1 bad to 3 good, I still managed to mismatch on (I think) 4 of the 10.

So there is definitely some interesting pickings in there and the trick is just being able to mine the data enough to make good guesses on which were done wrong.

If you'd like I can come up with specific lists of the smallest stuff (like under 45M?) that still seem like a 50/50 chance of you being the first person to test it correctly.
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-04-13, 21:12   #1405
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

29·113 Posts
Default

Here we go... top 100 below 45M, (as sorted by their bad/good ratio, but then re-sorted here by exponent size). Plus, for many of these, proving another of their results to be bad would give us more insight into whether that system is trending bad or good.

Code:
exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
40017451	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40017451,72,1
40039003	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40039003,72,1
40086727	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40086727,72,1
40158787	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40158787,72,1
40260631	2	2	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40260631,72,1
40341643	1	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40341643,72,1
40370777	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40370777,72,1
40717541	1	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40717541,72,1
40723597	1	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40723597,72,1
40794253	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40794253,72,1
40970491	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40970491,72,1
40976497	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40976497,72,1
41017013	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41017013,72,1
41033689	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41033689,72,1
41111471	3	2	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41111471,72,1
41198401	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41198401,72,1
41216089	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41216089,72,1
41217461	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41217461,72,1
41293633	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41293633,72,1
41312539	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41312539,72,1
41325443	9	7	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=41325443,72,1
41343461	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41343461,72,1
41389037	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41389037,72,1
41490667	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41490667,72,1
41502577	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41502577,72,1
41508209	3	2	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41508209,72,1
41531779	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41531779,72,1
41558743	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41558743,72,1
41652917	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41652917,72,1
41688589	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41688589,72,1
41755283	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41755283,72,1
41757431	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41757431,72,1
41808077	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41808077,72,1
41896727	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41896727,72,1
41946811	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41946811,72,1
42034007	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=42034007,72,1
42126517	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42126517,72,1
42141097	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42141097,72,1
42160159	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42160159,72,1
42197563	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=42197563,72,1
42263093	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42263093,72,1
42508573	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42508573,72,1
42527179	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42527179,72,1
42595369	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42595369,72,1
42745273	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42745273,72,1
42763069	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42763069,72,1
42949997	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42949997,72,1
43018181	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=43018181,72,1
43019161	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=43019161,72,1
43022533	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=43022533,72,1
43078279	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43078279,72,1
43083451	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=43083451,72,1
43099673	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43099673,72,1
43171369	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43171369,72,1
43179503	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43179503,72,1
43192003	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43192003,72,1
43209721	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43209721,72,1
43214879	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=43214879,72,1
43276693	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=43276693,72,1
43279447	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=43279447,72,1
43354453	1	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=43354453,72,1
43420451	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43420451,72,1
43426217	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43426217,72,1
43514987	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43514987,72,1
43525249	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=43525249,72,1
43587793	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43587793,72,1
43601227	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43601227,72,1
43707421	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43707421,72,1
43772653	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43772653,72,1
43869607	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43869607,72,1
43972813	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43972813,72,1
43982117	1	0	2	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=43982117,72,1
44019047	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44019047,72,1
44026459	1	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=44026459,72,1
44173097	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44173097,72,1
44221483	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=44221483,72,1
44241017	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44241017,72,1
44243429	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=44243429,72,1
44270477	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44270477,72,1
44306419	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44306419,72,1
44312129	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44312129,72,1
44312753	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44312753,72,1
44338909	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44338909,72,1
44385037	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44385037,72,1
44460517	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44460517,72,1
44495677	2	2	4	0	4	0	DoubleCheck=44495677,72,1
44509679	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44509679,72,1
44550673	1	0	7	0	7	0	DoubleCheck=44550673,72,1
44593921	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44593921,72,1
44628371	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44628371,72,1
44671169	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44671169,72,1
44732647	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44732647,72,1
44732731	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44732731,72,1
44755817	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44755817,72,1
44768441	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44768441,72,1
44773447	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44773447,72,1
44812973	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44812973,72,1
44860369	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44860369,72,1
44890757	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44890757,72,1
44916727	1	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=44916727,72,1

Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2017-04-13 at 21:12
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-04-13, 21:20   #1406
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·5,059 Posts
Default

I took-
Code:
40260631    2    2    1    0    1    0    DoubleCheck=40260631,72,1
kladner is offline  
Old 2017-04-13, 21:46   #1407
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

23×373 Posts
Default

I took

40017451
40039003
40086727
40158787
40341643
40370777
40717541
40723597
40794253
40970491
ATH is online now  
Old 2017-04-13, 22:05   #1408
sdbardwick
 
sdbardwick's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
North San Diego County

12508 Posts
Default

I took:

Code:
40976497	1	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40976497,72,1
41017013	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41017013,72,1
41033689	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41033689,72,1
41111471	3	2	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41111471,72,1
41198401	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41198401,72,1
41216089	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41216089,72,1
41217461	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41217461,72,1
41293633	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41293633,72,1
41312539	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41312539,72,1
41325443	9	7	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=41325443,72,1
41343461	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41343461,72,1
41389037	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41389037,72,1
41490667	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41490667,72,1
41502577	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41502577,72,1
41508209	3	2	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41508209,72,1
41531779	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41531779,72,1
41558743	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41558743,72,1
41652917	1	1	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41652917,72,1
41688589	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41688589,72,1
41755283	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=41755283,72,1
sdbardwick is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th? jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1? 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume. Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:56.

Thu Dec 3 20:56:35 UTC 2020 up 17:07, 1 user, load averages: 1.69, 2.06, 2.00

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.