sr1sieve 1.2.0

arminius · 2007-10-20, 07:05

speed increase ~13% on a C2D 6400.
Thanks Geoff!

VBCurtis · 2007-10-20, 08:58

Speed report: Old timings are sr1sieve 1.1.12.
Core2 Suse 64-bit: 11.1 mp/sec to 12.6 mp/sec. 14%.
X2 laptop Suse 64-bit: 4.1 mp/sec to 5.3 mp/sec. 30%!
This makes athlons even more specialized for sieving. Interesting, eh?

Speed measurements are from the current k=5 sieve.
-Curtis

em99010pepe · 2007-10-30, 21:00

Latest version is 1.2.1.

AES · 2007-11-13, 20:09

Is version sr1sieve-1.2.2-linux-x86-64 safe to use?

Edit: NM, it's slightly slower than 1.2.1 on Gentoo x86_64, or perhaps posting this question slowed it down.

Cruelty · 2007-11-13, 20:16

I am using this version some time now without a problem, but still it is marked as experimental.

Kosmaj · 2007-11-15, 22:09

The latest sr2sieve version is now 1.6.13. Trying it on my Athlon right now.

It seems that beginning from 1.6 he has only a single exe file for both Intel and AMD cpu's, before there was one for each of them.

AES · 2007-11-27, 21:03

Is anyone using the 64 bit windows version (sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64)? Should this run on Vista 64?

mdettweiler · 2007-11-27, 22:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by AES

Is anyone using the 64 bit windows version (sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64)? Should this run on Vista 64?

Yes, that's the version you should use on Vista 64-bit. I haven't ever tested any of the 64-bit apps (don't have a 64-bit machine myself), but they should provide a 2x speed increase over the 32-bit versions, from what I hear.

AES · 2007-11-28, 02:11

I've executed "sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64" on two Vista 64-bit operating systems with the same results:

"Faulting application sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, faulting module sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x000000000000745c, process id 0xd38, application start time 0x01c83162273cf469."

This happens just after the output:

Read XXX terms for XXX*2^n-1 from NewPGen file `XXX.txt'.

mdettweiler · 2007-11-28, 03:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by AES

I've executed "sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64" on two Vista 64-bit operating systems with the same results:

"Faulting application sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, faulting module sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x000000000000745c, process id 0xd38, application start time 0x01c83162273cf469."

This happens just after the output:

Read XXX terms for XXX*2^n-1 from NewPGen file `XXX.txt'.

Are you sure that you're using Vista 64-bit? If you're accidentally using it on a 32-bit Vista installation, I can imagine why it would give an error at that point in the output--that's when it would be starting the main computation code (the part that would actually use the 64-bit features, I would think).

If you know that you're definitely using the 64-bit version of Vista, then I would recommend downloading sr1sieve again--maybe something got messed up during the download process, and your copy is corrupted somehow. And if that doesn't fix it, I have no idea what's going on--maybe Geoff can have an answer there, since he wrote sr1sieve.

AES · 2007-11-28, 04:50

AFAIK, A 32-bit kernel cannot execute a 64-bit binary at all.

2007-10-20, 07:05	#1
arminius Sep 2006 Germany 2·59 Posts	sr1sieve 1.2.0 speed increase ~13% on a C2D 6400. Thanks Geoff!

2007-11-13, 20:09	#4
AES Jul 2007 Tennessee 1001100000₂ Posts	Is version sr1sieve-1.2.2-linux-x86-64 safe to use? Edit: NM, it's slightly slower than 1.2.1 on Gentoo x86_64, or perhaps posting this question slowed it down. Last fiddled with by AES on 2007-11-13 at 20:31

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
sr1sieve with work files?	masser	Conjectures 'R Us	1	2017-12-28 17:43
Building sr1sieve for RPi	wombatman	Software	14	2017-03-04 16:21
32-bit of sr1sieve and sr2sieve for Win	pepi37	Software	5	2013-08-09 22:31
sr1sieve and big P	barcode	Software	5	2007-12-27 04:05

2007-10-20, 08:58	#2
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 5803₁₀ Posts	Speed report: Old timings are sr1sieve 1.1.12. Core2 Suse 64-bit: 11.1 mp/sec to 12.6 mp/sec. 14%. X2 laptop Suse 64-bit: 4.1 mp/sec to 5.3 mp/sec. 30%! This makes athlons even more specialized for sieving. Interesting, eh? Speed measurements are from the current k=5 sieve. -Curtis

2007-10-30, 21:00	#3
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	Latest version is 1.2.1.

2007-11-13, 20:16	#5
Cruelty May 2005 11001011100₂ Posts	I am using this version some time now without a problem, but still it is marked as experimental.

2007-11-15, 22:09	#6
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2×1,811 Posts	The latest sr2sieve version is now 1.6.13. Trying it on my Athlon right now. It seems that beginning from 1.6 he has only a single exe file for both Intel and AMD cpu's, before there was one for each of them.

2007-11-27, 21:03	#7
AES Jul 2007 Tennessee 2⁵·19 Posts	Is anyone using the 64 bit windows version (sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64)? Should this run on Vista 64?

2007-11-28, 02:11	#9
AES Jul 2007 Tennessee 2⁵×19 Posts	I've executed "sr1sieve-1.2.2-windows-x86-64" on two Vista 64-bit operating systems with the same results: "Faulting application sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, faulting module sr1sieve.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4731ac12, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x000000000000745c, process id 0xd38, application start time 0x01c83162273cf469." This happens just after the output: Read XXX terms for XXX*2^n-1 from NewPGen file `XXX.txt'.

2007-11-28, 04:50	#11
AES Jul 2007 Tennessee 2⁵·19 Posts	AFAIK, A 32-bit kernel cannot execute a 64-bit binary at all.