20100915, 06:49  #1 
Aug 2010
2^{2}·3^{2}·17 Posts 
Redoing work?
I'm testing k=161 from n=1M and up using LLR version 3.8.1.
Today I found out from these threads: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...t=12214&page=3 and http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13889 that there was a bug in LLR which caused it to miss primes. Should I redo all or part of my work? Just wondering. Last fiddled with by MooMoo2 on 20100915 at 06:51 Reason: fixing link 
20100915, 07:05  #2  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
3·2,083 Posts 
Quote:


20100915, 17:33  #3 
Aug 2010
2^{2}·3^{2}·17 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Coordination thread for redoing P1 factoring  ixfd64  Lone Mersenne Hunters  80  20210119 17:17 
Redoing factoring work done by unreliable machines  tha  Lone Mersenne Hunters  23  20161102 08:51 
CUDALucas not redoing iterations with larger FFT  patrik  GPU Computing  2  20140912 00:56 
P1: poorly P1'd exponents that need redoing  James Heinrich  Marin's Mersennearies  54  20080407 20:27 
5.98M to 6.0M: redoing factoring to 62 bits  GP2  Lone Mersenne Hunters  0  20031119 01:30 