![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
6DE16 Posts |
![]()
It is a well-known fact that a real number is rational (i.e. can be expressed as the ratio of two integers) if and only if its decimal expansion eventually consists of an infinitely repeating string. But I've actually never learned a full proof.
I have learned one direction, which I can illustrate using an example Let x = 0.142857142857142857... Multiply by an appropriate power of ten so that the decimal point occurs right after the first appearance of the string: 1000000x = 142857.142857142857 Subtract to cancel out everything after the decimal point: 999999x = 142857 Divide by the coefficient of x to get 0.142857142857142857... = 142857/999999 It's easy to see that this argument will work in general. But I'm not so sure about the other direction... Showing that the decimal expansion of a rational number eventually repeats itself indefinitely. Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-10-01 at 01:13 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2,371 Posts |
![]()
Do they still teach long division by hand?
There are only a finite number of remainders, so they have to repeat eventually. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
![]()
Sure I learned long division. Not sure what you're trying to get at though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
2×3×23×31 Posts |
![]() Quote:
In a shorter example than 1/7, say 1/3, 1. you'd try to divide 1 into 3 and it's 0 times with 1 left over (0.), then 2. divide 10 into 3 and see that it's 3 times with one left over (0.3), then 3. divide 10 into 3 and see that it's 3 times with one left over (0.33), ... and so on forever (i.e. it's repeating exactly). Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2008-10-01 at 02:13 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2,371 Posts |
![]() Quote:
After you have used up all the digits in the dividend (the "a" value if we are calculating the decimal expansion of a/b), each step will be 1. bring down a zero 2. determine the next digit of the quotient 3. multiply the digit by the divisor (the "b" value) 4. subtract to get a new remainder. If you ever get to a remainder that you have seen before, you will get the same digit in the quotient, and same product, and the same next-remainder as the last time - everything, including the quotient digits - will repeat the previous result. But the remainder is always less than "b", so there are only b possible values - so you MUST see a remainder you have seen before in no more than b+1 steps. A few thousand hand done long divisions - standard elementary school drill in the era before electronic calculators - would have made this all obvious. Except in Yorkshire, of course, where they didn't have hands so they to hold the pencils with their toes. At least the lucky ones that had toes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a rational sequence | MattcAnderson | MattcAnderson | 2 | 2016-12-14 16:58 |
rational integers | wildrabbitt | Math | 17 | 2015-06-15 08:47 |
square expansion | cmd | cmd | 118 | 2010-05-28 09:18 |
Rational solution. | mfgoode | Homework Help | 9 | 2007-08-19 07:19 |
65 bit to 66 bit unit time expansion | Jwb52z | Software | 1 | 2002-12-20 07:15 |