![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Jul 2014
3×149 Posts |
![]()
Can anyone explain what's wrong with my logic?
https://www.mersenneforum.org/attach...1&d=1579005470 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jun 2003
23×607 Posts |
![]()
Golden ratio is an increasing ratio (i.e > 1). The first equation uses x as a decreasing ratio (i.e. x < 1). So you get 1/gr when you solve that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Feb 2017
Nowhere
431610 Posts |
![]()
The usual formulation for x and y being in golden proportion is
An illustration is given by the 72-72-36 degree isosceles triangle. The bisector of one of the 72-degree angles divides the opposite side in golden ratio; calling x the length of the base and y the length of the smaller segment of the side opposite the angle bisector, gives the above proportion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jul 2014
3·149 Posts |
![]()
Thanks very much to both of you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My algorithm mimics 2^P-1 with the golden ratio | ONeil | ONeil | 12 | 2018-04-17 09:15 |
Large Polynomial Equation Problem | carpetpool | carpetpool | 4 | 2017-02-03 12:48 |
Platonic solids and the Golden ratio (r) | davieddy | Puzzles | 9 | 2010-07-04 22:21 |
The Tangent and the golden mean | mfgoode | Puzzles | 1 | 2007-01-31 16:26 |
PrimeForm yielding few results - problem with equation? | roger | Information & Answers | 1 | 2006-10-15 03:50 |