![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
25×32 Posts |
![]()
Hi,
I've seen the following statement in a paper but I don't have access to the reference given. Could someone maybe help me with a proof, please? Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
24·101 Posts |
![]()
Hint: for any odd prime number q, 2 is a square (mod q) if and only if \(q\equiv\pm1\pmod{8}\).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
31208 Posts |
![]()
As this is related to Mersenne numbers, let's turn it into an exercise for anyone interested.
1. Show for all positive integers m,n that if m divides n then \(2^m-1\) divides \(2^n-1\). Let q be an odd prime number. 2. Show for all positive integers m,n with m>n that if q divides \(2^m-1\) and q divides \(2^n-1\) then q divides \(2^{m-n}-1\). Let p be an odd prime number as well and suppose that q divides \(2^p-1\). 3. Show for all positive integers n that q divides \(2^n-1\) if and only if p divides n. 4. Conclude that \(q\equiv 1\pmod{p}\). 5. Show that 2 is a square in the integers modulo q, and conclude that \(q\equiv\pm1\pmod{8}\). For the last part, the first example here may be useful. Last fiddled with by Nick on 2018-01-10 at 16:09 Reason: Clarification |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2·7·829 Posts |
![]()
Nothing like a little quadratic-residuacity exercise to get the new(ish) year off to a good start, eh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
4408 Posts |
![]() Quote:
NB Spoiler below. If Then, for example: And: Generalised: This is an integer for all integer values of n and x. Now, if n|m, then m = x * n, where m, n and x are all integers. So: Therefore: As above: It follows: So: And f(x) is an integer, so Last fiddled with by lukerichards on 2018-01-14 at 20:56 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26·131 Posts |
![]() Quote:
SPOILER tags But I know I can beat that in simplicity. Note the reccurence: [TEX]M_n=2M_{n-1}+1=2M_{n-1}+M_1[/TEX] This leads to [TEX]2^y(M_n)+M_y=M_{n+y}[/TEX] which when reccursively applied shows the statement. Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-01-14 at 21:50 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
25·32 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
24·101 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
12016 Posts |
![]()
I want to start thinking about the next point, but I've got actual work to do during the day!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
31208 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
838410 Posts |
![]()
Not only that, this solves ( or at least heuristics) the first 3 all wihout direct invocation of fermat's little theorem.
1) noted above. 2)see formula from 1, M_m= 2^{m-n}M_n+M_{m-n} q divides the first term, and so q must divide into the second term in order to divide the LHS. 3) following from 2, if q divides other mersennes other than multiples, it follows there is no minimal p, this leads to the absurdity that 1/ q is integer. Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-01-15 at 20:03 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exercise for gaming time | jasong | jasong | 7 | 2013-09-20 11:20 |
Is an online exercise game not based on trust doable? | jasong | jasong | 1 | 2013-04-07 05:55 |
Number of distinct prime factors of a Double Mersenne number | aketilander | Operazione Doppi Mersennes | 1 | 2012-11-09 21:16 |
Number of Factors for a Mersenne Number | kurtulmehtap | Math | 12 | 2010-05-03 14:02 |
Exercise 1.23 in Crandall & Pomerance | sean | Factoring | 2 | 2006-10-23 21:08 |