mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2017-04-12, 19:56   #1398
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

29×101 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by rudi_m Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)
The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue.

He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.

2017-04-12, 20:39   #1399
ric

Jul 2004
Milan, Ita

18310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose I track them all until they have a matching residue.
Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?

2017-04-12, 20:39   #1400
rudi_m

Jul 2005

101101102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue. He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.
Yes, all good. I just wanted to motivate Mad Poo, not blaming you! Actually I want to finish a lot of boring TF work right now unless interesting DC' are available ;)

Last fiddled with by rudi_m on 2017-04-12 at 21:05

2017-04-12, 20:46   #1401
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

1011011100012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ric Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?
No.

The ones that are fake primes, with C (composite) result with all-0 residues always need a TC.

Of the others, it really depends on the user/machine. MadPoo generally post lists where at least half the results produced by a machine are bad, which should mean that at least half the exponents need a TC.

2017-04-12, 21:00   #1402
rudi_m

Jul 2005

2668 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ric Just for fun, would you have any overall statistics on them (very simple ones, such as % of expos requiring TC)?
This would be really interesting!

Regarding my own stats, I've made 75% (377/492) "successful double checks" last year. Since I've made also some "normal" DC's I would estimate the real rate regarding this thread about 60%. This means that the chance to discover a prime by strategic DC might be similar to "normal" LL (if you choose the smaller/faster exponents only).

Last fiddled with by rudi_m on 2017-04-12 at 21:03

2017-04-13, 03:48   #1403

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

22×2,539 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by rudi_m Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)
I agree. I just ran a >70M exponent, but that was for a specific request. Smaller is certainly better at advancing the wave front by completing small ranges just over the definitively completed DC range. I am much more likely to pick up lower hanging fruit, if I get the chance. Most of my work goes through GPU72, though.

2017-04-13, 20:53   #1404
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

2·5·7·47 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose The lists I post are what's left from what Madpoo posts. I track them all until they have a matching residue. He's promising a new list soon, so hopefully there will be lots of small ones.
Yeah, I like working the smaller exponents too... it's fun to speculate there's a hidden prime somewhere below 60M or so.

I will try and get a new list soon. For fun the other day, I looked at the DC's below 40M that were still unassigned and using my stats, I picked the top 10 most likely to have been done wrong the first time and even though we're talking about bad/good ratios of like 1 bad to 3 good, I still managed to mismatch on (I think) 4 of the 10.

So there is definitely some interesting pickings in there and the trick is just being able to mine the data enough to make good guesses on which were done wrong.

If you'd like I can come up with specific lists of the smallest stuff (like under 45M?) that still seem like a 50/50 chance of you being the first person to test it correctly.

 2017-04-13, 21:12 #1405 Madpoo Serpentine Vermin Jar     Jul 2014 2×5×7×47 Posts Here we go... top 100 below 45M, (as sorted by their bad/good ratio, but then re-sorted here by exponent size). Plus, for many of these, proving another of their results to be bad would give us more insight into whether that system is trending bad or good. Code: exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 40017451 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40017451,72,1 40039003 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40039003,72,1 40086727 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40086727,72,1 40158787 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40158787,72,1 40260631 2 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40260631,72,1 40341643 1 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40341643,72,1 40370777 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40370777,72,1 40717541 1 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40717541,72,1 40723597 1 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40723597,72,1 40794253 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40794253,72,1 40970491 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40970491,72,1 40976497 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40976497,72,1 41017013 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41017013,72,1 41033689 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41033689,72,1 41111471 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41111471,72,1 41198401 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41198401,72,1 41216089 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41216089,72,1 41217461 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41217461,72,1 41293633 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41293633,72,1 41312539 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41312539,72,1 41325443 9 7 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41325443,72,1 41343461 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41343461,72,1 41389037 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41389037,72,1 41490667 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41490667,72,1 41502577 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41502577,72,1 41508209 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41508209,72,1 41531779 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41531779,72,1 41558743 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41558743,72,1 41652917 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41652917,72,1 41688589 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41688589,72,1 41755283 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41755283,72,1 41757431 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41757431,72,1 41808077 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41808077,72,1 41896727 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41896727,72,1 41946811 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41946811,72,1 42034007 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42034007,72,1 42126517 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42126517,72,1 42141097 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42141097,72,1 42160159 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42160159,72,1 42197563 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=42197563,72,1 42263093 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42263093,72,1 42508573 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42508573,72,1 42527179 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42527179,72,1 42595369 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42595369,72,1 42745273 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42745273,72,1 42763069 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42763069,72,1 42949997 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42949997,72,1 43018181 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=43018181,72,1 43019161 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=43019161,72,1 43022533 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=43022533,72,1 43078279 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43078279,72,1 43083451 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43083451,72,1 43099673 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43099673,72,1 43171369 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43171369,72,1 43179503 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43179503,72,1 43192003 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43192003,72,1 43209721 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43209721,72,1 43214879 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43214879,72,1 43276693 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43276693,72,1 43279447 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=43279447,72,1 43354453 1 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43354453,72,1 43420451 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43420451,72,1 43426217 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43426217,72,1 43514987 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43514987,72,1 43525249 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43525249,72,1 43587793 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43587793,72,1 43601227 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43601227,72,1 43707421 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43707421,72,1 43772653 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43772653,72,1 43869607 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43869607,72,1 43972813 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43972813,72,1 43982117 1 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=43982117,72,1 44019047 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44019047,72,1 44026459 1 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44026459,72,1 44173097 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44173097,72,1 44221483 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44221483,72,1 44241017 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44241017,72,1 44243429 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44243429,72,1 44270477 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44270477,72,1 44306419 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44306419,72,1 44312129 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44312129,72,1 44312753 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44312753,72,1 44338909 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44338909,72,1 44385037 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44385037,72,1 44460517 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44460517,72,1 44495677 2 2 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=44495677,72,1 44509679 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44509679,72,1 44550673 1 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=44550673,72,1 44593921 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44593921,72,1 44628371 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44628371,72,1 44671169 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44671169,72,1 44732647 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44732647,72,1 44732731 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44732731,72,1 44755817 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44755817,72,1 44768441 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44768441,72,1 44773447 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44773447,72,1 44812973 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44812973,72,1 44860369 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44860369,72,1 44890757 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44890757,72,1 44916727 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=44916727,72,1 Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2017-04-13 at 21:12
 2017-04-13, 21:20 #1406 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 22×2,539 Posts I took- Code: 40260631 2 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40260631,72,1
 2017-04-13, 21:46 #1407 ATH Einyen     Dec 2003 Denmark BDD16 Posts I took 40017451 40039003 40086727 40158787 40341643 40370777 40717541 40723597 40794253 40970491
 2017-04-13, 22:05 #1408 sdbardwick     Aug 2002 North San Diego County 2·11·31 Posts I took: Code: 40976497 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40976497,72,1 41017013 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41017013,72,1 41033689 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41033689,72,1 41111471 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41111471,72,1 41198401 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41198401,72,1 41216089 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41216089,72,1 41217461 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41217461,72,1 41293633 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41293633,72,1 41312539 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41312539,72,1 41325443 9 7 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41325443,72,1 41343461 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41343461,72,1 41389037 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41389037,72,1 41490667 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41490667,72,1 41502577 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41502577,72,1 41508209 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41508209,72,1 41531779 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41531779,72,1 41558743 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41558743,72,1 41652917 1 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41652917,72,1 41688589 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41688589,72,1 41755283 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41755283,72,1

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 50 2017-10-30 19:16 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:33.

Tue Mar 2 04:33:30 UTC 2021 up 89 days, 44 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.88, 1.96, 1.93