mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-12-18, 23:45   #243
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23×919 Posts
Default

Linux 64:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9ksfnkwtx5...64.tar.gz?dl=0
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 02:03   #244
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
wear a mask

3×11×47 Posts
Default

If a factor is not found, does the new code report the requested B2 or the computed B2? In my initial results, it appears to report the requested B2, which seems inaccurate.

These are the lines I tried:
Quote:
Pminus1=1,2,21150827,-1,6133,596857,66
Pminus1=1,2,31919773,-1,1901,84737,66

NEVERMIND: I'm wrong - misread the outputs. Code reported the B2 it used, which was not adequate in this case... I'll try to see how much memory to allocate to get the desired factor.

Last fiddled with by masser on 2020-12-19 at 02:09
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 02:34   #245
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

735210 Posts
Default

A present for your project -- I was comparing P-1 speeds for 30.3 vs. 30.4 and found this:

processing: P-1 factor 74415394148849438918449121 for M16963013 (B1=500,000, B2=20,500,000)
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 04:28   #246
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

107108 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
A present for your project


And....inquiring minds want to know...how do they compare please?
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 06:19   #247
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·919 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post


And....inquiring minds want to know...how do they compare please?
Was not a good test as stage 2 was limited to 300MB memory. Stage 1 was same speed.
30.3 did 17.3% of stage 2 to B2=10M in 470 seconds.
30.4 did 43.4% of stage 2 to B2=20.5M in 1940 seconds.

My extrapolation is 30.3 would have taken 2480 seconds to do what 30.4 did.

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2020-12-19 at 06:22
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 06:52   #248
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

23·607 Posts
Default

@George: Can you share the B2 selection logic (source code)? I want to understand/predict how memory allocation will affect this. Does the logic take into account MaxHighMemWorkers / worker-specific memory settings?
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 17:35   #249
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

23×569 Posts
Default

Are the save files compatible. I'm currently at 29.8
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 20:06   #250
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

23·919 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
@George: Can you share the B2 selection logic (source code)? I want to understand/predict how memory allocation will affect this. Does the logic take into account MaxHighMemWorkers / worker-specific memory settings?
B2 is selected when stage 2 starts. It uses the available memory according to Day/Night MaxHighMemWorkers/etc settings at the time stage 2 begins.

The source code will be made available, but emulating the B2 selection logic will not be easy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
Are the save files compatible. I'm currently at 29.8
See post #242
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-19, 20:13   #251
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

43510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
@George: [...] Does the logic take into account MaxHighMemWorkers / worker-specific memory settings?
That would be specifically interesting if e. g. an extra 100 MB would cause the algorithm to select a higher B2 with relatively little higher ETA.

An ECM got: M630901, B1 = 250k, B2 =155 * B1 @ 6 GB availible. Stage 1 took around 0.5h, stage 2 took 0.25h.

Edit: @George, thanks for a rough clarifications.

Last fiddled with by kruoli on 2020-12-19 at 20:14 Reason: Crosspost.
kruoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-20, 00:28   #252
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
wear a mask

30178 Posts
Default

Could someone teach me how to find the sigma that was used to find an ECM factor from the mersenne.org website?

I'm trying to test that the new ECM in version 30.4 recovers known factors without running hundreds of curves.

Last fiddled with by masser on 2020-12-20 at 00:29
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-20, 02:40   #253
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

23×607 Posts
Default

Potential P-1 (display) bug:

Stage 2 % resets to zero once a batch of relative primes is processed.

At least, that's what I think is happening -- haven't completed a full P-1 run yet.
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking of Joining GPU to 72 jschwar313 GPU to 72 3 2016-01-31 00:50
Thinking about lasieve5 Batalov Factoring 6 2011-12-27 22:40
Thinking about buying a panda jasong jasong 1 2008-11-11 09:43
Loud thinking on irregular primes devarajkandadai Math 4 2007-07-25 03:01
Question on unfactored numbers... WraithX GMP-ECM 1 2006-03-19 22:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:10.

Mon Mar 1 08:10:33 UTC 2021 up 88 days, 4:21, 0 users, load averages: 1.27, 1.52, 1.46

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.