mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-10-02, 23:16   #1
kdq
 
kdq's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Santa Clarita CA

168 Posts
Question Accuracy of completion date estimates?

I'm not complaining, mind you, but on all my machines, version 25.6 seems to be making very pessimistic estimations. Almost every day, the estimated completion is nearly a full day sooner than previous estimate. Is this usual/common?
kdq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-10-02, 23:34   #2
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

11×977 Posts
Default

Since you are relatively new (a new return), it is not uncommon for a machine to have low ball estimates. How many hours a day are you letting the machine run and how many did you tell it that you were going to run? That will effect it.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-10-03, 02:36   #3
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

11110000011002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kdq View Post
Almost every day, the estimated completion is nearly a full day sooner than previous estimate. Is this usual/common?
I have a similar problem with V24 estimates. It gradually gets better, and at the end of a sequence of tests the elapsed time is not all that far from the sum of original estimates. If I have several tests queued, the future estimates are consistent, but the in-progress test's estimate starts low then increases.

Prime95 does try to correct its estimates by keeping track of the ratio of actual times to estimated times. In file local.ini, there's a pair of lines like:

RollingAverage=457
RollingStartTime=1222988357

RollingAverage = 1000 * (initial estimated time) / (actual time)
= apparent speed of progress where 1000 = nominal

RollingStartTime is when its calculation started.

457 means that actual times are a bit over twice the unadjusted estimated times. In future estimates, Prime95 multiplies its formula-calculated estimates by 1/.457 to produce displayed estimates. Apparently, from my observations, it does not do that correctly for the in-progress test.

I do not know whether V25's estimation procedure differs from V24's.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2008-10-03 at 02:44
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-10-03, 05:51   #4
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

2×919 Posts
Default

I have noted this as well for trial factoring : with Prime95 25.6, 1,5 days are added to the first expected expected date, the following intervals are not inflated though.

Jacob
S485122 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-10-04, 05:02   #5
kdq
 
kdq's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Santa Clarita CA

2×7 Posts
Thumbs up

Well, that does explain it: it's adaptive. (24 hours and 24 hours to the first question.)
kdq is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does 'expected completion date' even mean? fivemack PrimeNet 7 2015-10-15 22:59
ETA VS Expected Completion Date QuickCoder Information & Answers 2 2014-09-05 00:19
Completion Date prediction Based on 24/7 Estimate? Unregistered Information & Answers 3 2009-11-21 23:57
Disable sending expected completion date? Xyzzy PrimeNet 1 2009-04-24 07:50
Expected Completion Date Orgasmic Troll Software 4 2003-07-19 02:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:55.


Thu Oct 6 09:55:19 UTC 2022 up 49 days, 7:23, 0 users, load averages: 1.33, 1.15, 1.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔