20221205, 03:34  #166 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3808_{10} Posts 

20221205, 03:52  #167 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2^{3}·3·5·47 Posts 
The new job should be about half the Qrange of the old one to get just the additional rels needed. As set now, you're gonna be like 40% oversieved. I didn't testsieve, but I bet 35125M will be plenty when combined with the old relations.

20221205, 08:33  #168  
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
1,327 Posts 
Quote:
The new job has started getting relations, by the way. 

20221205, 10:32  #169  
Jun 2012
3·1,283 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
If you come up short on rels I can bump up Q as needed on the a job of course. 

20221205, 10:41  #170 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
10100101111_{2} Posts 
For the record, I have a copy of the old job now. So if it is gone, we will be fine.
By my original estimations, 35M125M should give a bit more than 260M raw relations, so around 520M in total. I am not experienced in how the duplication rate will look like in this case (partly r and party a), but when this would not be sufficient, we have a great starting point; thank you! Last fiddled with by kruoli on 20221205 at 10:48 Reason: Math is hard. 
20221205, 16:58  #171 
Sep 2009
2×1,213 Posts 
I did a job sieved on both sides on 14e, I found I had to sieve about 50% more specialQs in total than sieving on one side would have needed. Which confirmed that sieving on both sides was not useful unless we were limited by what siever we could use.
It was 29^1731, jobnames f29_173m1a and f29_173m1r. Search for posts relating to it for more details. For 145!1 the speed up from the algebraic side will probably beat the higher duplicate rate, but I'm not sure exactly how many relations you will need. 
20221207, 13:34  #172 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
1,327 Posts 
There is only a handful of WUs available; we should move back at least one of the other jobs.
Last fiddled with by kruoli on 20221207 at 13:55 Reason: Spelling. 
20221207, 13:56  #173 
Jun 2012
3·1,283 Posts 
But are there enough rels now on the a side of 145!1_b to build a matrix once combined with those from the r side? It will probably be several days until we will know with any certainty, and I agree it’s time to restart sieving on another job, but I’m just suggesting we might have to bump up Q on 145!1_b and sieve it some more in the near future. Hoping not but…

20221207, 14:08  #174 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
1,327 Posts 
If we go by the numbers of Chris, we will need more relations, but I am willing to wait for our current WUs complete up to 10M outstanding, then I will download them and will give remdups4 a go to determine how much duplicates there are.
If you want to bump it right now, I won't be against that; if we have a healthy oversieve I can postprocess this on my laptop which has only ~12 GB RAM available and some/most of my ~460M relations jobs won't quite fit there. I think stepping down one or two steps on VBITS would be a possibility here, but I will use a high memory machine in that case instead. 
20221207, 14:41  #175  
Jun 2012
3849_{10} Posts 
Quote:


20221209, 11:02  #176 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
1,327 Posts 
145!1 now has 331M unique relations (including pending ones by extrapolating). I would assume that this would be able to generate a matrix, but a big one (> 30M). Please correct me if this estimation is wrong.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Queue management for 14e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  170  20230102 15:27 
2022  queue management for 15e_small  swellman  NFS@Home  186  20221229 17:58 
Queue management for 16e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  154  20221223 21:35 
Queue management for e_small and 15e queues  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  254  20220102 01:59 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 