20220901, 01:36  #111 
Apr 2020
1110100001_{2} Posts 
QUEUED AS L1992
Lucas(1992) is an SNFS candidate of difficulty 278. It has had 30000 curves at 260M and is ready for 15e. Code:
n: 10347436847870478097473793996844728322517625552949268810869325393228670032192139315003359513466518229018036726512764912259199493310792806318998768068141666522005734059417473442606468803049317915990798736047 skew: 1.14 type: snfs c6: 4 c5: 3 c4: 30 c3: 15 c2: 45 c1: 27 c0: 6 Y1: 6867260041627791953052057353082063289320596021 Y0: 11111460156937785151929026842503960837766832936 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 33 lpba: 33 mfbr: 96 mfba: 66 rlambda: 3.8 alambda: 2.6 Code:
MQ Norm_yield Speed (sec/rel) 25 5693 0.079 50 4955 0.096 75 4504 0.106 100 3763 0.127 150 3400 0.143 200 2918 0.160 250 2860 0.161 300 2620 0.173 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20220901 at 02:16 
20220903, 06:30  #112 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
7·733 Posts 
Just a quick note. That guy who was running only the 15e was on his goal to reach 100M overall, he is now running yoyo. Probably you already noticed the output dropping significantly. Good while it lasted.
https://stats.freedc.org/user/yoy/16779 
20220904, 21:59  #113 
Jun 2012
2×5^{2}×7×11 Posts 
QUEUED AS 6p5_374
6+5,374 is a quintic SNFS of difficulty 264 from the HCN project. It is ready for sieving on 15e. Code:
n: 772195493570538574472133350374480967574844577842826289795771391382764100945904744802912346588848659710233586306614014080071147694295400643959678427771190206502436816042476011847587401095077205239802931427496801156439464669390355574847473 skew: 1.0000 type: snfs size: 264 c5: 1 c4: 1 c3: 4 c2: 3 c1: 3 c0: 1 Y1: 166771816996665690000000000000000000000000000000000 Y0: 82089350328392269627321951212068476903210635085853041 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 94 mfba: 64 rlambda: 3.5 alambda: 2.8 Code:
MQ Norm_yield Speed (sec/rel) 35 2442 0.354 50 2600 0.324 75 2728 0.337 100 2656 0.356 150 2457 0.430 200 2458 0.362 250 2210 0.428 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20220904 at 22:59 
20220906, 14:26  #114 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
3^{2}×149 Posts 
GCW 3,543 is an SNFS 262 which is ready for sieving.
Code:
n: 2097026643802877507269943929206861145366651524876715588205870797295371435262177200032311581577065062943201951040730730939818168279185975155039206178294169390003508531914739075399798610623509784910133338777 skew: 0.26122 type: snfs size: 262 c6: 14661 c0: 1 Y0: 8727963568087712425891397479476727340041449 Y1: 1 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 91 mfba: 64 lss: 1 rlambda: 3.8 alambda: 2.7 Code:
Q norm. yield 40M 2677 70M 2216 125M 1880 200M 1720 300M 1481 I will do the LA. 
20220906, 14:37  #115  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3^{3}·11·19 Posts 
Quote:


20220906, 14:39  #116 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
3^{2}·149 Posts 
It looks like my testsievingscript has a bug and I was too blind to catch it, thanks! If you say 32/32 is appropriate here I will resieve with 32/32 and move it to 15e_small.

20220906, 14:59  #117 
Jun 2012
2·5^{2}·7·11 Posts 

20220906, 15:09  #118 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
3^{2}·149 Posts 
Making it 32/32 at lower lims was not good enough (around 390M relations), I will resieve for normal 15e.

20220906, 16:27  #119 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
10100111101_{2} Posts 
QUEUED AS 3_543m
GCW 3,543 is an SNFS 262 which is ready for sieving. Code:
n: 2097026643802877507269943929206861145366651524876715588205870797295371435262177200032311581577065062943201951040730730939818168279185975155039206178294169390003508531914739075399798610623509784910133338777 skew: 0.26122 type: snfs size: 262 c6: 14661 c0: 1 Y0: 8727963568087712425891397479476727340041449 Y1: 1 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 94 mfba: 64 lss: 1 rlambda: 3.9 alambda: 2.7 Code:
Q norm. yield 40M 3655 70M 3104 125M 2689 200M 2511 300M 2310 I will do the LA. Last fiddled with by swellman on 20220906 at 16:41 
20220906, 18:31  #120  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3^{3}·11·19 Posts 
Quote:
It's worth noting that using higherthanstrictlynecessary LP bounds means jobs don't need the absolute maximum relations count to build a good matrix. I've run 15e/32LP jobs that only needed 320M raw relations, because the jobs were a size that others might use 30LP (say, GNFS167). That's an extreme, but I bet this job needs only 440M raw relations, which would save another 10MQ. If you have time to filter twice, please try one run with filter_maxrels=440M and let's compare matrix sizes. 

20220909, 12:49  #121 
Jun 2012
2·5^{2}·7·11 Posts 
QUEUED AS 9p7_283
9+7,283 is a SNFS 270 composite from the HCN project. It is sieved on 15e. Code:
n: 170846439673200184435309938385385060653003635613117738799480834616922885468214755375809745242758989975794297370256548104543596886967251753546920228795598287182875795718376567439213341811486929467 skew: 0.9590 type: snfs size: 270 c6: 9 c0: 7 Y1: 5243338316756303634461458718861951455543 Y0: 706965049015104706497203195837614914543357369 rlim: 134000000 alim: 266000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 94 mfba: 64 rlambda: 3.5 alambda: 2.8 Code:
MQ Norm_yield Speed (sec/rel) 35 3380 0.173 50 3187 0.188 75 2907 0.289 100 2693 0.257 150 2264 0.312 200 2109 0.316 250 1936 0.317 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20220909 at 13:20 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Queue management for 14e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  170  20230102 15:27 
2022  queue management for 15e_small  swellman  NFS@Home  186  20221229 17:58 
Queue management for 16e queue  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  154  20221223 21:35 
Queue management for e_small and 15e queues  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  254  20220102 01:59 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 