![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2015
568 Posts |
![]()
Is there a "fully TF'd" list of exponents on mersenne.ca?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
537210 Posts |
![]()
Define "fully TF'ed". Do you mean fully factored?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Aug 2015
2×23 Posts |
![]()
Yes, fully factored
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mar 2014
22×13 Posts |
![]()
This would be an interesting list to see.
I suspect there are very few large exponents on the list -- finding one 60- or 70-bit factor of a million-digit number leaves a very large nut to crack. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
14FC16 Posts |
![]()
Check the top-5000 primes page for mersenne cofactors.
I assume there is a prp version of that page too with larger cofactors too big for ECPP just yet- perhaps someone could aim me the right direction? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
109C16 Posts |
![]()
Yes: top 20 Mersenne cofactors (proven).
There are some outstanding ones less than Primo's 35k digit limit. Here the reported gigantic PRPs -- I dare say Henri's list is out of date, in that some PRPs are proven primes. I am currently proving a ~15k digit Mersenne cofactor -- ETA less than a month form now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sep 2003
13·199 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Similarly M4834891, M822971, M750151, M696343, M675977, M576551, M488441, M440399, M270059, M157457, M41681 are missing. All of these do appear when you click the "The Full PRP Top" (on the first page from 1 to 250, or subsequent pages). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sep 2003
13×199 Posts |
![]()
Yes, here is the complete list. There are currently 310 fully-factored or probably-fully-factored exponents, in addition to the Mersenne primes themselves which are certainly also fully factored.
Only 63703 and smaller are certified and proven to be fully factored, the higher exponents have a probable-prime (PRP) cofactor, albeit with extremely high confidence. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2017-02-08 at 04:12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Aug 2002
5×1,697 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Sep 2003
13×199 Posts |
![]() Quote:
The record for Primo is 34093 decimal digits, which took 14 months with 48 cores, plus 200 additional days with 6 cores, by none other than Paul Underwood. Based on that, M106391 (with a cofactor of 32010 decimal digits) is the largest Mersenne exponent that could feasibly be fully factored at the present time. The next smallest is M130439, with a cofactor of 39261 decimal digits. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2017-02-08 at 18:32 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Largest Mersenne Number Fully Factored? | c10ck3r | Data | 49 | 2017-12-10 19:39 |
Exponent fully factored whilst only 74% known | mattmill30 | Factoring | 3 | 2016-08-14 18:09 |
Possibility of a Fully-Factored Number | Trejack | FactorDB | 7 | 2016-05-14 05:38 |
Factored vs. Completely factored | aketilander | Factoring | 4 | 2012-08-08 18:09 |
New program to fully factor with GMP-ECM | rogue | GMP-ECM | 51 | 2009-06-01 12:53 |