Go Back > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > storflyt32

Thread Tools
Old 2022-04-01, 17:09   #155
Feb 2013

2×3×7×11 Posts

That was better, so thank you very much.

If I could be getting a C200, with two factors known to be P100, it could not be so easy to factorize.

Only that such factors become added to the exclusion list, when dealing with such numbers as RSA-1024 and RSA-2048.

Here making it at least one better earlier on today, for that of at least one P35 became added.

Only knowing that I could multiply such factors together, and next "divide" from the RSA number, I get another one still left to factorize.

Here should tell that I got a P364 earlier on by doing it this way, but here still not being added yet.

This because the larger RSA is still meant for that of security, and I could be just ment to be kept away or hidden.

I could be still making a list of the factors I could get for the purpose it also could be meant for, when that of bit length or depth could be telling about complexity.

Really that multiplying all the small Genefer factors, or really Mersenne primes for next a "divide", only makes it still composite for what you could get, unless being lucky.

Here the problem is not how much dinner you ate, but what could be still lying on the table, and it only became a taste, when counting the number of possible factors less than or equal to 309 or 617 digits.

Should I try out WinPFGW or the like using the laptop, and it could become a red nose for getting hot, so not doing that for practical reasons.

I could be thinking of that for getting my flat in order, because here still a GTX480, two GTX680 and two GTX1080 cards lying around which did not break here.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2022-04-04 at 21:48
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-04, 21:45   #156
Feb 2013

2×3×7×11 Posts

Just the other problem for that of the Factordb, and you should be throwing out wrong or erroneous users for only leaving the server intact instead,
for still only such a thing meant.

This one broke on the steep side a short while ago, and I could have the factors before bedtime.

Quite good ones here, considering just a laptop being used, but initially a PRP for the latter one.

So do you make it any Proof method for not any guessing, when only the possible relationship between large factors for that of primes?

Either running endless for that of continuous, except only erroring here instead, for that of becoming too complex to handle.

So flip it around instead, for only the other factor being known (P46), and you end up with the same P92 here.

Trying out once more here for the regular factorization of the C138, for also a huge SIQS for that of the same.

Should I tell here as well, but my flat at home got out of shape for that of a fridge, so therefore being moved at doctors request.

Last night I lost the running session on the laptop for only a restart, and only two cups of decaffeinated coffee after having a shover first.

So here a little more positive now, for waiting for a little more heating in my room, and also someone charging my new mobile phone.

Here the problem is that of USB-C versus USB, where it does not fit against each other for only a proprietary design and development.

Therefore my laptop unable to connect with the phone, unless able to get at a bag where things from home could be lying.

But here only the weekend right now, and the keepers are not up to standard for not offering me any coffee or biscuits when starting.

So launching the mentioned SIQS in the background here for a DOS window, except still able to report the factor here.

But only for that of 877440 relations needed, I better should be doing other things instead, for not any waiting.

So why is it so that the software could be guessing about the factors when still only such a thing needed?

What if it just divided with 3 here for more of an easy answer, for not taking anything in advance for only granted instead?

Just for only predetermined at times, also a lookahead as well, but still not the software knowing the answer just here.

An example here is the number 24, where the small pocket calculator could be slow at giving the result.

This because it could end up becoming a computational issue for the whole thing, for not anything which could be known in advance.

Here left with SGS in my task list for that of PrimeGrid, which like PPSE or PPS, should be more neutral for that of running.

Becomes that of computation times for that of running here as well, for not any comparison it should be with any factorization instead.

Here I could be running a SGS in less than 30 minutes for that of being finished, except tomorrow or day later, for that of the SIQS.

So with my larger computer at home which only broke, that of PSP LLR instead for that of a little more complex, and I could still be
relating for only a comparison, between different numbers.

Here that of megaprimes became many now for only a discovery, and you could be making it a Genefer17 for only that of such.

So if not any suffice here for only that of processing time, still a Mersenne prime could be needed for just only better.

But is it so for only that of rowing at sea, you still wish to get back at shore for only discovering land, except only waiting instead.

Here it should not be any such thing for only determined when still only just waiting, for only back ashore for such a thing only made.

Only that of living your life for not any Event happening instead, it becomes only a wait here instead, for also delayed time for the same.

So here only included for that of "en masse", and it becomes all those things still happening, for not any "inclination" instead.

Rather we could be asking for an intended meaning for only such a thing happening, except it only could be taking place for that of happening.

But still only a couple of factors for that of (2^4096+1) and I better should be making it Mersenne numbers for that of being added here instead.

Next only subtract 1 for that of -1 when only a less for that of a multiplication being made, because any such number should be still the largest.

But only that a wait is still for a possible betterment, when only waiting for a result happening, and you could be celebrating for only such.

Here the little expectancy is still for only a delivery for that of a child being born, so here not any Laws or Equations of nature just either.

Checking, and the list of primes for only just known, should perhaps be a little more or higher up in the list for that of being visible, but here 51.

here still only a bit of running time for only a computation when also a slight delay for not any spinning loop, where it also could be erroring.

So if love was still only a kiss, and I ended up only falling for such a thing, I could be still erroring out for only failing, except also down the drain.

Perhaps still only hopelessly in love, but the end result could be still only a failing result, because here I was still sailing at sea, for only just waiting.

What if I made it all the Mersenne primes for just known, and next added it together for only multiplying, and next subtracted with 1?

Is the answer you could get only Probability for only such an issue at hand, for not any predetermined instead, when still not any knowing?

Here I could be still making it a preferred issue by means of Mersenne primes for only just looking, except not any other for still only a guess.

The little priest could be still asking for only making it religious Belief, except also the scientist giving the answer by means of Equations.

Here a given notion of time and space could be making it open for that of completion only for such, only because it should be having an ending.

But only that we made it no such thing either, for still not any knowing for only the answer it could be, when still adding for just together.

Only that a completion of nature could be still made or possible for having that of Religion being included, except not any ghosts or dreams instead.

So forget the M52 here for not any impossible just either, but only the time it could take, when still pondering about the secrets of nature,
for just the other thing.

Again the SIQS here for that of the previous, for only the comparison I still could make.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2022-04-09 at 07:58
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-04-19, 19:48   #157
Feb 2013

2·3·7·11 Posts

Next I was mistyping for only making it Faculty here.

Apologies here, for just adding the P83 to the P48 for already having, except that the factorization could be a difficult one.

More that I could be wrong, because here the product in fact is a C131, and not C137, and next checking for actually being true.

But rather more asking how many such we could be having, for still only composite numbers needing such a thing for only being factorized.

Substitute or replace either the P48 or P83 with the P55 here for much of the same, and next the same flipover for doing it versus RSA-1024
for only the repeating cycle it could be.

Trying out with the P48 here at first, and becoming a C103 after checking, and the flipover just below, for also a SIQS.

Next keying in the factors in the wrong direction for that of order, and sorry about that, but a P34 or so here.

There you have it, for that of welcome, but if making it a SIQS here, I could be checking in tomorrow for that of result.

And Google Chrome could be having a problem for that of pull-down menu for that of tabs, because here clicking for a new one instead.

Perhaps old habit here only, for still the "+" sign besides or to the right of opened tabs, but here clicking it anyway, for not the down arrow.

But only so sad once again, for that of re-running the task I already got quite factors on, but next stuck in the mood for not any willing.

Here the elephant could be remembering what he only got to learn, for not picking it up again for only learning again for the long time it could take.

Such a thing should also be with Yafu, for only ending up so for picking up a previously run task for only a redo, except only a refresh.

But also that for a laptop computer, I am still back at the limits of factoring for only coming a short way, for not any full distance instead.

Here it should be a 64-bit processor for also 8 GB RAM, for also a mentioning about possible SSD, which needs a lookup.

Suppose that capabilities for only intended becomes the range such a processor is capable of reaching, except also sieving limits for also FFT.

In fact, just 32-bits here for also memory, only makes for limits for that of such when still given range for possible, because here not any cracking.

Doing so, and next only say goodbye for doing any such thing, when perhaps a RSA-155 or the like for just the breaking of factors it could be.

More that it could be about processor speed here for that of cycles, because a good such one could be running at 4 GHz speed at optimal.

But also that processor could be more that of clock speed as well, for still cycles, because here also timeslices for that of interval.

This because the clock inside the processor is not only showing the time of day, but also could be making that above for distribution of processes,
or maybe affinity for also synchronization.

So easy it is for only a tick of a clock for only the second it could be, when a processor could be carrying out thousands of instructions in the meantime.

Once again I am getting a C95 for that of a remainder, and will have to wait a little for only the factors showing up by means of SIQS.

So here you know that a processor is capable of doing such a thing for only that of speed, and next forgetting about the little tick it could take.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2022-04-19 at 22:21
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Previous Miss? R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2009-11-14 19:57
Using long long's in Mingw with 32-bit Windows XP grandpascorpion Programming 7 2009-10-04 12:13
I think it's gonna be a long, long time panic Hardware 9 2009-09-11 05:11
UPDATED: The current pre-sieved range reservation thread and stats page gribozavr Twin Prime Search 10 2007-01-19 21:06
Ram allocation (in Re: previous thread) JuanTutors Marin's Mersenne-aries 1 2004-08-29 17:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:52.

Thu May 19 22:52:29 UTC 2022 up 35 days, 20:53, 0 users, load averages: 1.41, 1.35, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔