mersenneforum.org Challenge
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2009-08-16, 21:24 #1 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 20C816 Posts Challenge if you look at wikipedia the double mersenne primes go: 7, 127, 2147483647, 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 first all of them end in 7 next if you look at the table for mersenne primes they have: p Mp 3 7 7 127 127 170141183…884105727 If I'm right in assuming the last Mp is the last in this series and this pattern continues( the pattern is Mp becomes the next p) then the next one in this sub series( or what ever you want to call it) is: p 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 Mp 2^170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105, 727-1 if this is true it smashes all records as the biggest prime to date and biggest mersenne prime is 2^46 million and something this is 2^ 170 Undecillion and something. I left gimps as it took to much time for me. but can anyone confirm this pattern or try it out if so it would be the biggest known prime.
 2009-08-16, 21:26 #2 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 23·1,049 Posts Oh by the way it might take 21 tera tera tera bytes to write in binary form but anyone willing to try ?
 2009-08-16, 21:34 #3 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 839210 Posts oh if you look at it the pattern would be (2^3)-1,(2^7)-1,(2^2^7)-1,(2^2^2^7)-1,(2^2^2^2^7)-1,..........................................................................................................
2009-08-16, 21:38   #4
lfm

Jul 2006
Calgary

52×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by science_man_88 if you look at wikipedia the double mersenne primes go: 7, 127, 2147483647, 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 first all of them end in 7 next if you look at the table for mersenne primes they have:
No one knows if the 3rd exponent yields a prime let alone the 4th. This is just someone's wild speculation.

 2009-08-16, 21:45 #5 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 20C816 Posts actually it's a pattern I saw as a possibility in the table but if you don't want to find out if M170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727 is prime Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2009-08-16 at 21:45
 2009-08-16, 21:52 #6 science_man_88     "Forget I exist" Jul 2009 Dumbassville 23·1,049 Posts 2^3 = 8-1 = 7 2^7 = 128-1=127 2^127(messed up before) = 170141183460469231731687303715884105728-1=170141183460469231731687303715884105727 2^170141183460469231731687303715884105727-1 ? Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2009-08-16 at 21:56
 2009-08-16, 21:58 #7 Dougal     Jan 2009 Ireland 2·3·31 Posts it is impossible to confirm with todays technology.the only thing that can be done is confirm it is not prime.this can be done by trial factoring it with a program such as factor 5.it has already been trial factored up to around 170 bits without a factor.
2009-08-16, 22:01   #8
lfm

Jul 2006
Calgary

52×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by science_man_88 2^3 = 8-1 = 7 2^7 = 128-1=127 2^127(messed up before) = 170141183460469231731687303715884105728-1=170141183460469231731687303715884105727 2^170141183460469231731687303715884105727-1 ?
We would like to know I suppose but we are not going to find out any time soon without some breakthrough in the math. It is simply too large to test with any known method of testing primes.

The record is 2^43112609 - 1 that was discovered last year by the GIMPS projects.

2009-08-16, 22:04   #9
lfm

Jul 2006
Calgary

52·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dougal it is impossible to confirm with todays technology.the only thing that can be done is confirm it is not prime.this can be done by trial factoring it with a program such as factor 5.it has already been trial factored up to around 170 bits without a factor.
I think it is too large for factor5 too. I suppose it could be tested for factors with some relatively simple new software but it doesn't realy seem worth the effort at this time.

 2009-08-16, 22:10 #10 Dougal     Jan 2009 Ireland BA16 Posts M170141183460469231731687303715884105727,MM127 can be tested with factor5.he also mentions MM31,i thought there was a factor found for it?
 2009-08-16, 22:18 #11 flouran     Dec 2008 72·17 Posts Does science_man_88 = ? I am not sure yet, as I have not had much experience with the and related creatures. Anyone agree/beg to differ? If so, I vote that this thread should be moved to Miscellaneous Math. Last fiddled with by flouran on 2009-08-16 at 22:24

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post devarajkandadai Miscellaneous Math 0 2012-05-31 05:17 petrw1 Lounge 14 2009-11-23 02:18 ValerieVonck Factoring 58 2005-10-24 15:54 R.D. Silverman Programming 24 2005-07-27 21:08 JuanTutors PrimeNet 2 2004-07-22 12:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:56.

Fri Aug 19 08:56:30 UTC 2022 up 1 day, 6:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.00, 1.03, 1.05