![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2011
After 1.58M nines:)
3×557 Posts |
![]()
I take two small weight K from base 5. I do many sieves but never see this behavior:
Both K has no factors in range 10000000000000 - 10324861412587 ( using sr2sieve) It looks like very big gap... This is just observation , but I would like does somebody else had a similar case Thanks Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2016-03-18 at 23:01 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
7·829 Posts |
![]()
How many candidates are in the sieve? How deeply sieved is the sieve file you're using?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2011
After 1.58M nines:)
3·557 Posts |
![]()
There is 23000 candidates in both sieve: one sieve has 6000 candidates, second sieve has rest of them.
How deeply? I wrote you what range is mystery :) no factors in range 10000000000000 - 10324861412587 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advantage of lattice sieve over line sieve | binu | Factoring | 3 | 2013-04-13 16:32 |
46k sieve, max. n = 5M | Cruelty | Riesel Prime Search | 11 | 2010-03-10 22:15 |
Sieve Vs PRP | Chino112 | Prime Sierpinski Project | 6 | 2007-03-28 19:15 |
Help with PSP Sieve | cswchan | Prime Sierpinski Project | 7 | 2007-02-03 19:24 |
Which sieve to use for n^n-1? | Siemelink | Factoring | 11 | 2006-11-08 18:08 |