mersenneforum.org Except for the last page, the previous thread became a bit long.
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2020-09-28, 22:31 #135 storflyt32   Feb 2013 2×229 Posts Oh, still there for just contents, and next thanks, for not any saying it should be either,. Some scientists, if not any numbermaniacs, or mathematicians, could be questioning that of numbers for still the way it could be, for not any just meant. Next proving for that of science, if not any numbers just either, and next perhaps a P55 versus P89, for only the impossible it could be. So, proving a nature for only that of different parts, and next Divide and Conquer only for such. I had a couple of more ones just blow here, and one of these became more than 1.3 million seconds for that of running time, using Yafu-x64. Next it does not divide, but only flipping back on itself for that of a more simple or easy fashion, next taking not much time at all. So, if here adding the simple one or part for just presenting, next the little laugh just here, for only that of simple, except that it flippped around, for just the same number instead. Here it becomes a P57 versus a P133 for only letting you know, and here a P24 for the second or other factor, for still just added. The problem is that I flipped around, but only after getting the factors for that of the long one just here, so here it goes. Next ring a bell, for still not any besides just here either, for also thinking it could be so as well. Here 5*7=35 is a quite elegant pair, for not any 7*7=49, for just being squared instead. So when you think that just the Magic number could be that of pairs for just adjacent with each other, next also the dream you perhaps could make. Rather just close instead, when still not any "perfect" pair just either, for only falling out of my mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio Only said, for that of mentioned, and still not any working just here either. When I see or notice that it just flips around for that of simple, next also a stomach for such, for perhaps the "simplistic" it could be. But next also makes for a disappointment as well, for still not any result for only approach just here. I could add it here later on, but again that the large one for that of factorization came first, and next flipping back for that of the second, when also quite small. Hmm, just thinking, what if I added the flip-around side first, for only letting you know it became the harder or opposite side first? Links coming up shortly, but here sagging for just the night, and also a couple of beers. Edit: Hi stupid, for just not you letting you know, or telling just alone, for not any P57 versus P133 either. http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001573752784 Next knowing that such a link should not be left alone for that of the bottom of a text or posting, except only waiting a little, for that of right-clicking. Oh, Microsoft, except still only answer for just only meant, when that of a factorization just here. Total factoring time = 1329642.0566 seconds for also initially a PRP133 here, like a couple of some others. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-09-30 at 02:12
 2020-10-08, 03:19 #136 storflyt32   Feb 2013 2·229 Posts Apologies, for that of the previous, for not any numbers or factors it should be in quantities, for still only combined. Just tell me of any difficult it perhaps could be, and next I only could know, for still only answer meant, for not any presumption by means of Mathematics or numbers instead. But only that I could make it only two stones for that of placing my feet on, for not any four, and next besides each other for still only a pair, for also adjacent for the same. Here some quite nice numbers located on my disk, for at least one not any reported yet. But here, if only second last factor, for not any final or last instead, next thinking it perhaps could be good, and next factoring for the rest, for only the opposite side it could be. Here I did so for that of ecm, and the first one took just an hour, while the other had me wait just the whole day in order to complete. Those things which happens, or is supposed to break for only in between, could next be "nutcrackers" for only factors, because it could break the whole thing. But next a little unsure it or whether it became the second last factor here, for not any last factor instead, for only the better it could be. Example: C76 = 2953294354223949732615582289484452489259031293100494809723036394375695379753 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001581884026 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001581884111 C97 = 6502272423069966071625287777892733670542118237708859354129648899492218158437195693582108074271809 P35 = 14162758796605278881383344728210303 P63 = 459110581239900693468051312607794241795352186021698289923850303 C93 = 429413890114964541221149953458781359831412744927294738372960293822238574468279472256332037557 P37 = 1192998755176376411479733860860090401 P57 = 359944960756877521395768989672909871834754715932082004757 Not any bad at all, for still perhaps the added or completed it could be, for just the same, because here it took a while. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-10-08 at 03:44
 2020-10-09, 08:49 #137 storflyt32   Feb 2013 2·229 Posts Perhaps a new one just here, for not any "Good morning America" just either. The P63 for also P57 just combined, could be making for a P144 at the other end, except here only old of age, for also the drunk it perhaps could be. So here I made it some 1.3 million seconds for that of a factorization, and next only stored away, for not any fliparound just instead, for only the better it perhaps could be. But next still not any reported here, and I could blame such a thing for only the next last factor here instead, for still not any last, for only the flipping it perhaps could be. And here for some reason, you make it still a factor just weighted here, when also heavy for the same, when only drawn for just a pull when still only an extract, from that of a composite number for only defined. So when it becomes still only the same here, for just another round, I could blame the second last factor just here, for not any end or ending factor instead, only because it could be "better". Does that of such a thing tell about anything for just only interest or curiosity, when still only numbers mixed in together, for that of a blend? What if two different factorizations just took some time to complete, and next adding it together for only multiplication here for that of such, except not any factor just before or preceding the end or latter number? Is the one at the end still only better just here, or could the one just before be only insignificant or miniaturesque for not any adding a piece just at all? Here the large one for that of factor is still that of main, for only the small one just besides, for only just adding, for only the insignificant or meaningless it perhaps could be. So here not ask me for any "trolls" just either, for just not any trying either, except that the end factor of a 1.3 million second factorization could still mean something, or being that of significance for just only meant. And yes, we could be still asking for only better numbers for only just meant here, for not any troll in words, for also the jack in box it could be. But here only the relaxed or released I only could be, and next also lazy, and I could be sleeping on the floor for just comforting a little, next for only myself. Next tell me about any secret, for perhaps not any better it should be, for still only a factor missing or forgotten, for only just the between it perhaps could be. Here I could be still adding a couple of factors, and next also some quite good ones, for still not the one we could be wishing for, just between the lines. So here I could be looking at syntax perhaps, only because it could be somewhat standing out in the crowd, for perhaps not any obvious or evident either. But next you think that a prime number or factor could be just rare for only that of showing up, and next different from the others, for perhaps only the display or view it perhaps could be. When you only make it so, it becomes still that of weighted, for just the other it perhaps could be when only rare, except also different as well, for only perhaps another visibility, for next only showing up. Anyway, I could still continue on the story for just the rare or strange it perhaps could be, when still not any different from just the other thing either. When you add for still only a multiply, for only these strange numbers, it becomes that of composite for only just combined, except still not any strange or rare for just individual instead. We could make it still composite numbers still a mix for only a blend when also a mixture, except not any "distillation" for just a fact, when only a factorization instead. So think of it as playing on the piano for only the right it perhaps could be, for not any threading wrong instead, for perhaps only a wrong note. Rather that I just hit it on the spot for just the perfect or superlative it could be, and next also a number matching a wish, for still only seeking just here. So, for not any "never say never", I could perhaps dissolve a couple of numbers here, for only the factorization it could be, for not any pleased or satisfied for only numbers being returned. Rather that you make it still both the Magic number (or RSA-1024) for also RSA-2048 for still only order just meant, for also the direction you perhaps could follow. But only for doing so, you also know that it could be still weighted for only factors in between, except only unknown, for that of actual result. And here still only just a composite number for that of just combined, when still not any hidden or secret factors inside or between, for only just hidden. Is nature still only delicate here for just not any numbers here, and next only "umm" for that of tasting a little just here. And yes, only delicious just here, for that of crab in my mouth, except still not any Magic number just here, for that of better factors just standing next to another, for only the added or included it perhaps could be. So here I could be selecting for only a given meaning, and next an extract for only the same, when perhaps only the better numbers it could be just here. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-10-09 at 09:03
 2020-10-09, 10:32 #139 storflyt32   Feb 2013 7128 Posts Anyway or okay, but you could be still affiliated with the Factor Database or FDB here, just only? One of my factorizations made it that of 1.3 million seconds for that of running, and next thinking it could blow the other way, for just not any results at all. So here it becomes still only a single way for just only meant, when also an approach for just the same. So bad, when still not any attributed or ascribed for still only a meaning, when perhaps only making it so, for only the case or instance, for not any resources, next only just available, or in front of me. So guess what, for still only the premature it perhaps could be, next also that of shape or silhouette for still only nature, when still perhaps not any meaning for the same. Anyway, so just the ok or okay I could be making it for the same, when still not any enveloped or convoluted it could be just here, for also a secret for that of the same. So, do I next only have to make it a secret here, for only that of nature just only defined, for still not any before or beforehand, for also the later or afterwards I could make it? Those things we could be still making only Concepts, for that of sins for also renunciation when also an excuse, should still not be any Constructs for meaning, for only the absolutes we could make it instead. Rather that you make it still only completeted when also assumed, for only the ascertained or ascribed meaning it could be instead. So here both destruction and annihilation goes for that of science for only a better meaning, for not any ascribe or attributed it could be instead. Fixing it that later instead, for still only so just meant, when still only total just here. Just ugly me, and next only an approximation for still only the same. Here I left the main computer for being mentioned at the projects as well, for only a failing keyboard. The 1.3 million second factorization was perhaps not anything you got, but could be still lying here, for just around. Here a C88 was done on the server, and next flipping around at the end for only quite more easy, some 10,000+ seconds. The C88 in fact did not work out using ecm with 2^22 curves here, next telling about difficulty. Rather that we see the exclusion mechanism just here, for only picking from each end, and next meeting in the middle. Any PXX for also PYY, next multiplied for the product it only could be, and next flipping around for the same, for only the composite it could be. So here a P172 during the day, and next I did it wrong just here from the start, when only flipping back on itself. Correcting just that, and it became a P33 here from recall, when that of a P52 just at the end. And here got just tired fingers, for only checking in the morning, for perhaps something in between just here, and next also a bit difficult. So please have me excused, for not making it any Fallacies here, for just the lack of Belief it could be here as well. At PrimeGrid, we could be having a discussion for that of the next prime it could be when still only Proth, except only PSA just here. So think of it as only dinner served, for not any just in hand it could be either, for only that of believability it could be versus only given Proof. Next, ask for it for still only meant, because we could think that it could be completeted for just only nature meant, for also realizing just for the same. But here the better word for such a thing is that of recognition instead, when only such a thing for that of a smile, for not any light bulb just instead. Here it makes me think that still infinity for just meant, also could be a discussion for the same, except not any completeness for only assumed. So what if I was only for that of readily assume here for only a meaning - should I be still only a believer, or should I rather prove for only science just meant? I could be still adding the 1.3 million second factorization just here, do not forget that or such a thing either, for still only the better it perhaps could be. I could be doing so, and next not any secret here, for only posting the link for just only needed, and here thinking about that. Wait just a moment, and I could be having it later on, for that of the FDB first, and next also here. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-11-21 at 11:25
 2020-10-17, 06:41 #140 storflyt32   Feb 2013 7128 Posts Perhaps a new one just here. http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001585220649 But here still not any tested versus or against RSA-2048 here, for only the better it next could be, and pulling from the other end, for still only an extract just here. Doing that tomorrow just here. And for only a new start when also continuing, here my documents ended up at Google OneDrive as well, and could be adding factors from the laptop, when the keyboard for the main computer broke, for also the spare ones I could have. Here it downloads for just the mess it became when only becoming UTF-8 for still Windows (CRLF) when still only Notepad here. Among the numbers for only factors just found, also a P154 having a syntax for quite a particularly good reading, and posted at PrimeGrid here. P154 = 3540059347078761314664748238675668249978923993410111801988930640122798609020099356856644830266162476541379248990455576108055241155962671751878771348110017 Should tell that I had the Magic number dividing with a factor here, but next both ending up with 3, for that of 9 for only an ending, or product. Here only so close, when also uneven, for that of a P103 versus P206 for only a recall, and next only far from the truth. Doing so for also RSA-2048, and not any far away just here either, but next only unsuccessful for that of the larger once again. Here a C107 broke for that of a P71 versus P36, and next loosening up a couple of other things, for only the same way of doing. Making it a P56 for another factor, and I could be past any middle or average, for only smaller factors on the fliparound side. Rather that I could make it 2*3 or 5*7 for still the P71 versus P56 for just multiplied, and next the true answer for still only the fliparound. Some people could make it still 65537 here for still not any Genefer, but only a substitute for that of RSA here instead. But here 2*3*7 is still 42, for also 168/4 (integer division) making for still the same, for not any certificate just in between. Edit: Huh, so that of perhaps the better, for not any lookback for only a C136 instead, when perhaps a P71 for only known. Here the idiot of sorts could be asking when we could be meeting again, for not any closed door it should be either. To my best guess, for also knowledge, the factors of the Magical number should be the remaining factors for only left, when still sieving for only the best we could perhaps make it. Here the flipover for the abovementioned C136 could still end up a P54, when also a surprise for the same, for only given number. http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001586983155 So, look back at RSA just here, for only the numbers it could be, when also excluding for the same, for perhaps the dealing of numbers for just the same. Say you, say me, for not any C136 being factorable either, but only that it slips around for that of the other way, for still a P54 just here. So you think it perhaps could be the better numbers just here, for still only the fliparound, for that of a remainder. Next it bumps, for still only above or below, because you could be pushing it further for only answer just meant. Checking with the posted link, for that of a copying and paste for only main here, and next still my eyes. Edit: Trying to update with the FDB here, but grinding to a halt for that of painfully slow. Next making a new one post here, for that of continuing, because here a couple of better factors in the meantime. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-10-29 at 23:11
 2020-10-31, 03:09 #141 storflyt32   Feb 2013 2·229 Posts So let it rain, because here a factor in between for perhaps reporting needed. Just finished with that, and it became just two factors multiplied, for only the composite it still could be, except not any next to nothing, for only possible difficulty. When I know that a given nature is still offering possibilities, not any relaxing it could be, for only just the chair, except only taking it for granted, for just only meant. But next asking if any factors of the Magic number could be included for just part, when also factorizing other numbers, for the secret it perhaps could be. Here not trying or giving a hand right now, except knowing that a single number at times could be resolving a whole chain, for which it could be still a part. Example here is a C107, where at first it became a P32 or so, for also a P76. Taking quite some time, and it could still flip around for only a composite number, except perhaps also more easy at the other end. Here I do such a thing right now, for that of a C145 versus a C132, and next it flipped around for a factor when using the square root of the product. But next still the exclusion mechanism here, where it becomes the final number at the end, which for some reason became forgotten or overlooked. We never make it any daring, except only DYFL for that of PrimeGrid, when it could be still +1 for just the better number it could be. But here I shorted, for almost a short circuit, and ended up with 999, for just the factors it could still only be. Here we make it so that a rep-digit number or factor is perhaps not any weighted at all. Only that you flip it to just the other side, for only such a thing it could be, except the leftover being still only composite. Perhaps Genefer is really such a thing, for that of rep-digit numbers at times, for still not any weighted, for only the other side or flipover still only composite. So here I know that 111 is 3*37, but that 1/37 makes for the possible other number. (10^100) / 37 ***factors found*** P1 = 2 P1 = 3 P1 = 3 P1 = 3 P1 = 3 P1 = 5 P2 = 67 P3 = 199 P3 = 397 P5 = 21649 P5 = 34849 P6 = 333667 P6 = 513239 P19 = 1344628210313298373 P51 = 362853724342990469324766235474268869786311886053883 ans = 1 So what about any (10^1000) / 37 instead? Answer still unknown, but could be a better factor just down the road, for the time it could take. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-10-31 at 03:10
 2020-11-15, 05:57 #142 storflyt32   Feb 2013 7128 Posts Hello, or just hi! http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001590201530 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001590178406 I think I may have added the P15 here just earlier on, except also thinking that the pair of P54 and P68 factors, should be almost impossible to factorize, when that of simple or given context, for just the one thing it could be. One possible option is letting it become that of a SIQS here for just running, except also the months it could take for just completing. Here you know that I only did or let it become so, for only a factorization at the other end, where it could be that of FF, for just fully factored. So, is any testing for only the possible it could be, or should it also be relevant for just Fact? Next loud and clear just here for only standing out, because here it became just a multiplication between two numbers for only the difficult it could be, except also returning an answer or product, for just a factorization at the other end. Is or could it be any match or mismatch for still only deciding here, when still only numbers, for not any nature, except also relating to each other, for only the normal context it could be? We could make it so that just a C122 here could be a blindgate or dead end (Cul-de-sac) for not any factorizable at all, except still a valid number. So yes here perhaps, only because I could know, and next knowing that two numbers could be relating to each other for only a separate context, when still only a fliparound. But here perhaps more examples, for only several, in that Number theory should still be for only what we could conclude, and not any assume or guess instead. Perhaps I could be making it science here, for not only numbers, when that of "Mission impossible", except only nature for that of its greatness, when still large or big, for also the precious or special it could be. But more perhaps that of splendor or magnificence instead, for still not any splendid, because here not any slicing of just an onion either, except only a towel for that of handshake. And next, sneeze, for only a snort, because here not any "Towers of Hanoi" just either, but only a dreadful disease just observed or heeded, for also thrown down between our ears, when perhaps not any giving a call for only listening. So think of just a call being only a voice being heard, and here not any call of nature for just only "call of the wild", because here only a wolf crying for just bitter cold. when still not any apt or inclined just here. Before even translating, it could become that of standing put when just ready here, except only military discipine, for not any jargon. You already know that I do not do or make it any Mersenne here for just testing, when still only WinPFGW or the like just here. So here I was asking a moderator at PrimeGrid for perhaps the sieving application it could be, when just GPU or CUDA for that of Genefer here, except not receving any positive answer back in return. But only making a notice that I could be halfway between Turquouise and Jade here, for still only the Genefer it could be, for that of task or project. And here only making it a comparison for also reference, for still only the Statistical reference it could be, when still not any forgiving or unforgiving for just only nature meant. Are numbers just anything, for still not any "spliced", or could we combine or relate it for the context it perhaps could still be? Another project could be making it true or Truth for only certain meaning, except only part, for which it could still only belong. So here we know that any completeness of nature should be still just everything for only seen or observed, for also witness, when also contemplating for the same. Think of it as any raising of the hat, for still only just bowing for that of dust in the sand, when still only completeness could be relating to just the everything we could make, for not anything else instead. So here both little, less, or least for that of science, when also more, much, or most, except that likely should be still Probabiilty, for that of only just better. "We choose to go to the Moon", for still not any less or likely, because here only a Statistical summary for just only nature meant, for also possibility versus likelihood. So here you just invent a couple of words, for making it grand or total, when still only included, for perhaps the betterment or greatness it could still only be. Left only to assume, when also speculate, and still only infinity past the border or limit it could perhaps be, when also perimeter or frontier, except not any nature defined for the same. So, hopeless, for not any hope or expectancy, and perhaps nature could be still delivering for only the same, except only a Premise versus Proof, for still only the answer or Truth it perhaps could be. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-11-21 at 11:34

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2009-11-14 19:57 grandpascorpion Programming 7 2009-10-04 12:13 panic Hardware 9 2009-09-11 05:11 gribozavr Twin Prime Search 10 2007-01-19 21:06 JuanTutors Marin's Mersenne-aries 1 2004-08-29 17:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:41.

Wed May 19 00:41:09 UTC 2021 up 40 days, 19:22, 0 users, load averages: 2.46, 2.18, 2.05