![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2004
italy
113 Posts |
![]()
is this:
Code:
30867071 102 F 3953901635355166087069060014031 17-Dec-05 00:55 koekie melig |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina
24768 Posts |
![]()
This can be explained because p - 1 = 2 x 3 x 5 x 23 ^ 2 x 43 x 109 x 269 x 467 x 62119 x 220681 x 30867071.
The latest prime factor is always a divisor of M(30867071), so it does not count for the "smoothness" of the number. The number 62119 must be less than the bound B1 and 220681 must be less than the bound B2. From this LMH thread for exponents about 20M the value of B1 is 120000 and the value of B2 is 2430000. For exponents near 30M the bounds must be greater (but I don't have the exact numbers Prime95 is using), so Prime95 was able to find this 102-bit prime. Some people here can compute the probability that the algorithm p-1 can find a prime with 102 or more bits given that p-1 is multiple of 30867071. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2·7·829 Posts |
![]()
p-1 factors of over 100 bits are not terribly rare - I remember seeing the 113-bit factor 9859882222392454186560939051870161 of M20812849, and there may be even larger ones. Still nice to find, though. ;)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Aug 2002
223 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I found this one a while ago: 23292847 F 103 8092687948661261082412157958831 14-Feb-04 01:24 PJM-Borg01 Code:
8092687948661261082412157958831 Sieving... 3 * 7 * Commencing Pollard rho... ... 92507 * Commencing Pollard (p-1)... .. 102103 * 40800022252112594591 Last fiddled with by Paulie on 2006-01-01 at 22:04 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jan 2003
Altitude>12,500 MSL
101 Posts |
![]()
Paulie, the v5 factor checker under test now says:
8092687948661261082412157958831 is NOT factor of M(23292847) but: 3953901635355166087069060014031 IS FACTOR of M(30867071) 9859882222392454186560939051870161 IS FACTOR of M(20812849) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Aug 2002
223 Posts |
![]()
Saw that, posed in the other thread. It passed on the old server.
Aw man, I don't want to lose credit from my biggest returned factor! I hope it's the new code. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2·3·52·72 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2×7×829 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Jul 2005
1100000102 Posts |
![]()
Add a 1 on the front.
2^23292847-1 mod 18092687948661261082412157958831 = 0 So it is 103 bits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Aug 2002
223 Posts |
![]()
Thanks Greenbank.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
63008 Posts |
![]()
The top-10 reported P-1 factors on the Mersenne-aries stats page are all more than 30 decimal digits:
http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/?showuserstats=* My longest is 4323110550526375709294437681284209923347881 for M15910439 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Q6600 reported at 100mhz | slipstik | Hardware | 3 | 2016-10-01 14:34 |
mfaktc: Mis-reported composite factor | mattmill30 | GPU Computing | 1 | 2016-02-05 19:41 |
S/R Base 5 Primes reported in 2011 | Joe O | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 16 | 2011-12-05 09:17 |
Typo in reported factor? | R.D. Silverman | GMP-ECM | 5 | 2011-02-21 14:33 |
When will M42 be reported? | Uncwilly | Lounge | 21 | 2005-02-18 15:42 |