mersenneforum.org > News Holy Saint Lucas! 2 new primes?
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2008-09-16, 13:17   #232
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

8,369 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Flatlander "Finding World Record Primes Since 1996" or "Finding World Record Primes For 12 Years"
"Holding the World Record Since 1996"
"Holding the World Record for XX years running."
"The Unrivaled World Leader Finding Mersenne Primes"
"Owner of the First Ever 1,000,000 Digit Prime"
"Kick Crays to the Curb Since 1996"
"Besting the Supercomputer Since 1996"
etc.

Couldn't the server be set up to rotate the banner?

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2008-09-16 at 13:18

 2008-09-16, 13:25 #233 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2·3·293 Posts The links http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...9/prime-c.html and http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...7/prime-c.html appear to be broken. So what was the press outlet? Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-09-16 at 13:31
2008-09-16, 13:39   #234
PatrickSchmeer

Nov 2006
Saarbruecken, Germany

2×3×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jinydu The links http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...9/prime-c.html and http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...7/prime-c.html appear to be broken. So what was the press outlet?
http://www.mersenne.org/m45and46.htm

2008-09-16, 13:39   #235
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

700810 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jinydu The links http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...9/prime-c.html and http://prime.isthe.com/chongo/tech/m...7/prime-c.html appear to be broken. So what was the press outlet?
Chongo will make those files later today. He's probably still asleep.

San Diego Union Tribune. They said they'd do an article today or tomorrow. They relented on the embargo. Several other news outlets have asked for the press release. Don't be surprised if the news comes out of Europe first.

 2008-09-16, 13:46 #236 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2·3·293 Posts Who is Chongo?
2008-09-16, 13:51   #237
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jinydu Who is Chongo?
Look up the obfuscated C contest.

 2008-09-16, 13:54 #238 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 25·3·73 Posts Why did Unverified Primes go from 2 to 1 to 2? When M37156667 was reported prime, the primenet reports correctly displayed the fact that there were two unverified primes. What no one noticed was that in the cleared exponents report, only M37156667's residue was masked. For 3 hours, M43112609 sat there displaying a residue of 0000000000000000. When I saw that I quickly deleted 43112609 from the server database - the count went back to 1. A few hours later, I tried reinserting the row but with the fake residue. This time the cleared report showed the fake residue but it was right justified instead of left justified. I thought someone would spot that, so I removed the row again. For several days, no one noticed that 43112609 was missing from the report. Until patrik tried to submit a P-1 result... So, I reinserted 43112609 with the fake residue and marked it composite. I then changed M38859463's state to prime. The unverified count was right and the cleared report properly displayed 43112609's fake residue. I'm somewhat surprised that the super sleuths here never figured it out! Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2008-09-16 at 14:22
2008-09-16, 14:13   #239
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted

"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 When M37156667 was reported prime, the primenet reports correctly displayed the fact that there were two unverified primes. What no one noticed was that in the cleared exponents report, only M37156667's residue was masked. For 3 hours, M43112609 sat there displaying a residue of 00000000000000__. When I saw that I quickly deleted 43112609 from the server database - the count went back to 1. A few hours later, I tried reinserting the row but with the fake residue. This time the cleared report showed the fake residue but it was right justified instead of left justified. I thought someone would spot that, so I removed the row again. For several days, no one noticed that 43112609 was missing from the report. Until patrik tried to submit a P-1 result... So, I reinserted 43112609 with the fake residue and marked it composite. I then changed M38859463's state to prime. The unverified count was right and the cleared report properly displayed 43112609's fake residue. I'm somewhat surprised that the super sleuths here never figured it out!

I just noticed that I have a copy of the cleared.txt that shows M46 with a 0 residue (right justified BTW), but I never noticed. How did I miss that!??!!?!? Why in the world didn't I think to look for a 0 residue?!?!?!

*bang head on keyboard* (anyone know of a good smiley-type picture for that?)
Unfortunately, when I got that cleared.txt, I was looking for MSep, not MAug, otherwise I might've noticed it before I removed all without 0x in the correct spot.
Here's that line:
Code:
43112609  69                     0000000000000000  23-Aug-08 07:33  UclaMath       C20E3341C

 2008-09-16, 14:14 #240 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2·3·293 Posts Strange. I thought some of the other sleuths had hourly archives of the cleared.txt report and would have caught something like this.
2008-09-16, 14:48   #241

Aug 2008

2×43 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 For 3 hours, M43112609 sat there displaying a residue of 0000000000000000. When I saw that I quickly deleted 43112609 from the server database - the count went back to 1. A few hours later, I tried reinserting the row but with the fake residue. This time the cleared report showed the fake residue but it was right justified instead of left justified. I thought someone would spot that, so I removed the row again. I'm somewhat surprised that the super sleuths here never figured it out!
ROFL

I hadn't been watching that closely, since I knew that everyone else was, and they were better sleuths than I. That is one funny story, though! Grats to everyone involved!

 2008-09-16, 14:54 #242 Brian-E     "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 2×23×71 Posts Funny indeed - it must have been a heart-stopping moment when you noticed the 0 residue and a frantic struggle to cover it up. Maybe some people did in fact notice but decided to keep quiet because they value the GIMPS project and its integrity and newsworthyness. I didn't notice it myself, I hasten to add. Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2008-09-16 at 14:55 Reason: typing error

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post henryzz And now for something completely different 42 2019-06-03 14:09 Batalov And now for something completely different 9 2017-06-28 16:56 fivemack Math 14 2017-02-05 05:44 ewmayer Science & Technology 4 2008-03-14 19:19 R.D. Silverman Factoring 11 2005-04-07 17:00

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:05.

Tue Aug 4 14:05:55 UTC 2020 up 18 days, 9:52, 1 user, load averages: 2.46, 1.98, 1.91