20200619, 21:56  #386 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5·19·61 Posts 

20200619, 23:16  #387 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
2556_{8} Posts 

20200621, 05:34  #388 
Sep 2011
Germany
3·19·47 Posts 
Another issue with the latest srsieve2:
from 14.06. Code:
g:\sierpbase913>srsieve2 n2501 N10000 P1e9 W16 spl_remain.txt fB srsieve2 v1.2.1, a program to find factors of k*b^n+c numbers for fixed b and variable k and n (p4) Removed 1875 algebraic factors for 324*913^n+1 of the form (2*3^2*913^(n/2)+2*3^1*913^(n/4)+1) (kp) Sequence has algebraic factorization: 74088*913^n+1 > (42^3)*913^n+1 (kp) Sequence 74088*913^n+1 has 2500 terms removed due to algebraic factors of the form 42*913^(n/3)+1 (p4) Removed 1875 algebraic factors for 334084*913^n+1 of the form (2*17^2*913^(n/2)+2*17^1*913^(n/4)+1) Sieving with generic logic Sieve started: 2 < p < 1e9 with 237646250 terms (2501 < n < 10000, k*913^n+c) (expecting 229697511 factors) p=135719, 209.3 p/sec, 207211870 factors found at 3.199M f/sec, 0.0% done. ETC 20200626 12:17 Code:
g:\sierpbase913>srsieve2 n2501 N10000 P1e9 W16 spl_remain.txt fB srsieve2 v1.2.1, a program to find factors of k*b^n+c numbers for fixed b and variable k and n (p4) Removed 1875 algebraic factors for 324*913^n+1 of the form (2*3^2*913^(n/2)+2*3^1*913^(n/4)+1) (kp) Sequence has algebraic factorization: 74088*913^n+1 > (42^3)*913^n+1 (kp) Sequence 74088*913^n+1 has 2500 terms removed due to algebraic factors of the form 42*913^(n/3)+1 (p4) Removed 1875 algebraic factors for 334084*913^n+1 of the form (2*17^2*913^(n/2)+2*17^1*913^(n/4)+1) Sieving with generic logic Sieve started: 2 < p < 1e9 with 237646250 terms (2501 < n < 10000, k*913^n+c) (expecting 229697511 factors) Sieving with generic logic Split 31687 base 913 sequences into 31687 base 913^1 sequences. p=275794661, 4.765K p/sec, 20401086 factors found at 70.73K f/sec, 27.6% done. ETC 20200621 07:32 
20200621, 23:09  #389 
Jun 2003
11000101011_{2} Posts 
I tried your file.
I have to copy the CL folder to mtsieve for it to compile. gcwsievecl still crashes. Last fiddled with by Citrix on 20200621 at 23:17 
20200622, 02:08  #390 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·3·1,031 Posts 

20200622, 02:09  #391 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×3×1,031 Posts 

20200622, 04:39  #392 
Jun 2003
1,579 Posts 
I downloaded the latest version of mtsieve and compiled it. gcwsievecl.exe does work and did not crash.
The cl code is not working properly. I will play with it and let you know. The make file for version 1.94 is not properly configured for GPU compiling. 
20200622, 04:58  #393 
Sep 2011
Germany
2679_{10} Posts 

20200622, 12:35  #394 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·3·1,031 Posts 

20200622, 12:44  #395  
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·3·1,031 Posts 
Quote:
Originally I had only one exe, which works for most people even if they didn't or couldn't use the GPU code, but some had issues because at runtime it would look for GPU related libraries even if they were not using GPU workers. For example, there is now App_cpu.o and App_gpu.o. App.cpp is used to build both, but a compiler switch will build different objects. 

20200622, 18:50  #396 
Sep 2011
Germany
3·19·47 Posts 
