![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
10011000110012 Posts |
![]()
The (N)eed (F)or (S)peed II Challenge issued by SETI.USA team and will start from 2015-03-15 00:00 UTC to 2015-03-20 00:00 UTC.
Stats can be followed here: http://boincstats.com/en/stats/challenge/team/chat/652 Please note that this is a 5 days challenge with wu deadline of 7 days meaning that people will start bunkering 6-7 days before the start of the challenge. So 8-9 days before we need to feed the applications with work: 14e Lattice Sieve - cache size of at least 70k wu's 15e Lattice Sieve - cache size of at least 70k wu's 16e V5 Lattice Sieve - cache size of at least 400k wu's Carlos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
4,889 Posts |
![]()
I expect more than 3000 cores to be added before challenge start. SETI.USA has more than 2000 cores by itself. LAF (Biggest French team) will also be on the challenge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
10011000110012 Posts |
![]()
Tom, are you reading this? I need guarantee that we will have plenty of 14e and 15e work for the challenge.
I will chase Greg for 16e V5 work. Thank you, yoyo and Paul, What is the ECM status on the GCW candidates? Carlos Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-02-18 at 15:11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
1065310 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
100100101110002 Posts |
![]()
Homogeneous Cunningham numbers have >> t50.
One can start from the bottom of this list and go up. The polynomials are easily built with this; you can build a hundred polys in less than a minute and because they are all in the same size class, tag the constant limit part at the bottom: Code:
rlim: 120000000 alim: 120000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sep 2009
11110100012 Posts |
![]()
While t50 + several hundreds of curves at B1=11e7 yields low enough risk of severe ECM misses (p4x factors), it still leaves a significant risk of p50-p55 factors on SNFS 240+ numbers (which is what I'd rather queue to 14e for the challenge), which would raise some eyebrows in the factoring community
![]() Any chance we could get at least 10K curves at B1=11e7 (15K for a full t55 if you wish) on several Homogeneous Cunningham numbers of SNFS difficulty 242-250 in time for the challenge ? Say, for instance: * first batch: 7^293-5^293 , 7^293-6^293 , 7^293-2^293 and 7^293-3^293; * second batch: 7^293+2^293 , 7^293+3^293 and 7^293+4^293. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
23·52·47 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Nov 2003
746010 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
13×491 Posts |
![]()
Carlos: at what point would it make sense to move all the 15e targets from 'queued for sieving' to 'sieving' in preparation for this Need For Speed challenge?
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2015-02-26 at 08:12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
4,889 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
4,889 Posts |
![]()
Tom, please start thinking for the next three days to:
<max_wus_in_progress> 100 </max_wus_in_progress> Currently is set to 50. Thank you. Carlos Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-03-04 at 21:29 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New For Shipmates, Pirate Challenge on NFS@Home | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 4 | 2017-08-30 19:46 |
7/10-14/10 Need Faster Ships, Pirates Ahoy part deux NFS@Home Challenge | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 3 | 2016-10-07 21:04 |
Need Fast Ships, Pirates Ahoy NFS@Home Challenge | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 19 | 2016-10-03 13:43 |
NFS@home Air Strike on lasieve5f Application (Challenge issued) | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 4 | 2015-08-26 19:45 |
Who is Challenge? | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 2 | 2004-07-22 12:56 |