mersenneforum.org To 100M to 75 Bits
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2016-11-01, 17:24 #1 petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever!     "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 23·197 Posts To 100M to 75 Bits Code: YYYY-MM 71-Exp 71-Days 72-Exp 72-Days 73-Exp 73-Days 74-Exp 74-Days Total-Days 2016-11 287,983 1,514,036 353,420 3,721,261 376,132 7,957,670 400,961 17,290,758 30,483,724 Assumed: - All exponents 66M to 99M should/will be factored to 75 Bits. - Equal distribution of exponents in each Million range. - Used GhzDays for x.5M exponent for the entire Million range - Reduced by exponents expected to be factored in each range DID NOT account for what P-1 would eliminate though I believe that is NOT done until after TF to 75 is done.
2016-11-01, 18:58   #2
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

2×3×1,567 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by petrw1 Assumed: All exponents 66M to 99M should/will be factored to 75 Bits.
1. All exponents up to 80M have already been TFed to at least 75 bits.

2. For some users going to 76 bits makes sense above 80M, depending on their cards.

3. There is no rush on this. The LL'ing is far behind.

2016-11-01, 19:51   #3
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

23·197 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall 1. All exponents up to 80M have already been TFed to at least 75 bits.
There are a almost 23,000 between 66M and 70M not yet at 75 Bits.
I suspect these exponents have already been LL'd.
So this would be more of a DC-TF ... granted DC is a VERYYYYYYY long way from there.

2016-11-01, 20:09   #4
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

940210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by petrw1 So this would be more of a DC-TF ... granted DC is a VERYYYYYYY long way from there.
LOL... Yeah, DCTF to that range and depth is a very long way away (read: years).

LLTF to 76 bits is clearly more important at the moment, and interestingly some are already working that for the P-1'ers currently.

2016-11-01, 20:31   #5
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

24·3·61 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by petrw1 There are a almost 23,000 between 66M and 70M not yet at 75 Bits. I suspect these exponents have already been LL'd. So this would be more of a DC-TF ... granted DC is a VERYYYYYYY long way from there.
And they should probably remain at 74 bits. Going to 75 bits only makes sense to do before both LL tests.

2016-11-02, 05:45   #6
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

Jun 2011
Thailand

100011101100002 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose And they should probably remain at 74 bits. Going to 75 bits only makes sense to do before both LL tests.
Totally +1 !

 2017-04-17, 04:03 #7 petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever!     "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 23×197 Posts 5 and a half months later (April 16, 2017) Code: YYYY-MM 71-Exp 71-Days 72-Exp 72-Days 73-Exp 73-Days 74-Exp 74-Days Total-Days Percent 2016-11 287,983 1,514,036 353,420 3,721,261 376,132 7,957,670 400,961 17,290,758 30,483,724 100.00% 2017-04 185,543 954,413 259,261 2,659,396 304,180 6,306,903 341,956 14,554,544 24,475,256 80.29% Almost 20 Percent progress. Understood that from 83M on we are going to 76 bits ... and maybe before 100M to 77 bits?

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post TheMawn LMH > 100M 25 2016-04-18 16:11 aurashift Software 18 2016-04-14 13:48 markr Lone Mersenne Hunters 21 2008-12-21 16:02 stars10250 Hardware 8 2008-10-02 15:21 S485122 Software 2 2006-10-31 19:14

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:46.

Sun Jan 17 21:46:39 UTC 2021 up 45 days, 17:57, 0 users, load averages: 1.80, 1.96, 1.91