![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
3·137 Posts |
![]()
I dunno, if he's got a bunch of cpus there why waste them? I wonder myself if p-1 work wouldn't help more but hell on it, it doesn't hurt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
17·541 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
A lot of the earliest people in on the 100M digit range did not do enough TF on their exponents. I have been working in this range for years, before P95 was set to do exponents in that range. BTW, I welcome anyone with a GPU to help out, especially taking exponents right up to 79 or 80. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2013-03-30 at 05:59 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
41110 Posts |
![]()
I'm just going to toss this out there because it popped into my head, but although it is a serious offer I don't actually expect you to take me up on it, Uncwilly.
I run all my processing power in the LL range because I think that's where we are closest to falling behind - I could be wrong, but last I checked we were about 11 months ahead on DC and, mostly because of your coordination, we were well ahead in the LMH range too. But still, we always need more p-1 action in the LL range, so I'd be willing to trade up some ghz days if you like. Specifically, for every ghz day you can p-1 some candidates in the current ll range, I'll dedicate 10 ghzdays of gpu power to taking whatever number you want to whatever bitdepth you want. I do care about the LMH range same as every other range, I just try to go where I'm needed most and I know laurv works in the LMH range sometimes and can probably singlehandedly factor more of those to 78 in a day than get passed out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
17×541 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Starting today, I will pick up some P-1's from GPUto72. I will start some of my slaves on these. To date, I have no P-1's in that range completed. Once I have turned in a few, I will let you know here. Just take the next available exponent from GPUto72, in the 332M range, up to 79. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
24BA16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I will also take on one assignment to 79. One GHz year -- two days on my puny little 560. (As an aside, this exercise demonstrated that I had made a really stupid mistake on the assignment form for 100M digit assignments. Thank for letting me know Bill.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
1100110112 Posts |
![]()
There were no factors to 79.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
ἀβουλία
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
32·241 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
17·541 Posts |
![]()
I have gotten 4 P-1 assignments from GPUto72, 2 will complete shortly, the other 2 are in queue right behind them. 2 cores total running P-1 (1 per machine). I will likely add 1 or 2 more cores tomorrow. I will also take more assignments.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×3×1,567 Posts |
![]() Quote:
So you know, my exponent (332,309,699) turned out to have a 76.92 bit factor, so you only owe me 86.35 days of P-1'ing... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
15448 Posts |
![]()
I'm working on a 332.3M to 79; do you need to know what it is when I finish?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To 100M to 75 Bits | petrw1 | GPU to 72 | 6 | 2017-04-17 04:03 |
Is LMH > 100M still alive? | TheMawn | LMH > 100M | 25 | 2016-04-18 16:11 |
100m p-1 and tf | aurashift | Software | 18 | 2016-04-14 13:48 |
Anyone working in 79.3M - 100M ?? | markr | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 21 | 2008-12-21 16:02 |
100M madness | stars10250 | Hardware | 8 | 2008-10-02 15:21 |