![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
329010 Posts |
![]()
Doing a reboot of the server soon - updating the backup software, so that's important.
![]() It's 2018-12-28 @ 5:11 AM with an expected downtime ~ 15 minutes. EDIT: Back online. Okay, it was more like 18 minutes. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2018-12-28 at 05:29 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2·5·7·47 Posts |
![]()
I'm going to go ahead and do some updates on the Primenet server:
2019-02-04 @ 03:15 (UTC) I noticed a funny period of SQL queries taking long and even though it's stabilized (and only lasted a few minutes about 30 hours ago) I wanted to go ahead and update things. I'm only doing SQL updates so the downtime should be minimal, ~ 5 minutes. EDIT: yup, it was about 5 minutes, all done. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2019-02-04 at 03:21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2×5×7×47 Posts |
![]()
I'm about to do some updating on the server.
It'll be down probably 30 minutes, and I'm starting at 05:50 UTC on 2019-03-24 EDIT: All done Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2019-03-24 at 06:32 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2×5×7×47 Posts |
![]()
I'm taking the server offline for a few minutes for some SQL related maintenance.
I could have done it offline but I'm altering some tables that would make it slow and non-responsive anyway which would only be more frustrating for people. ![]() I expect it to finish in a few more minutes. EDIT: Back in action. Took longer to update that pesky table than I had hoped... probably would have been faster to drop the indices, alter it, then recreate indices. Oh well. All done. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2019-04-20 at 17:10 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
329010 Posts |
![]()
There is more SQL maintenance happening right now. At least this time I waited until later in the evening in the US.
Working on some tables, dropping and adding columns. It affects web visits so I disabled the web service while the work is happening. ETA about 25 minutes EDIT: Back online - didn't take as long as I thought. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2019-04-21 at 07:16 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
CDA16 Posts |
![]()
I'm going to be taking the server offline for a brief period to do some routine maintenance.
I expect to start @ 18:10 UTC (2019-05-15) and it should be ~ 20 minutes (it's now 18:05 UTC, so yeah... 5 minutes from now) UPDATE: It finished a little ahead of time (by a few minutes). Good to go. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2019-05-15 at 18:38 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
13·373 Posts |
![]()
In response to <link removed by LaurV>
I got a null page (no assignments, no error message) Or maybe it relates to my slow but unreliable DSL. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-05-20 at 03:11 Reason: remove link |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2·5·7·47 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2·19·241 Posts |
![]()
Worked for me too. I got an assignment (91338227) which I am going to work on. I removed the link from original post however. Curious people will click on it, and this seems to me a way to trick people in getting unwanted assignments, which they will not work, and will stay there and clutter the DB.
(No, it didn't trick me, because I read Madpoo's post first, before clicking, and I needed one new assignment, but it would for sure do trick me, if not for Madpoo's post, because I am a curious monkey!) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-05-20 at 03:18 Reason: spacing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
10010111100012 Posts |
![]()
No trick intended. The point was, I went for a manual assignment, and instead of it working as usual, returning one or more assignments with aid(s), it returned an incomplete page as shown in the attached screen capture image, which might have been due to the maintenance going on at the time. It worked for me before that, and after that. It's not at all surprising that it would work days after the maintenance was completed; that is the intended result of maintenance!
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-05-20 at 14:17 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2·5·7·47 Posts |
![]() Quote:
When I'm going to do any maintenance like installing the Microsoft patches, my first step is to stop the web services before installing anything. There's usually a very good chance the patches are going to stop/start web services, especially when doing .NET framework stuff, so I just avoid it and stop it altogether. I suppose if the timing is just right, I could stop the web services and something that was "in progress" could get killed off prematurely. Typically though, when you stop the web server, it lets any outstanding requests complete first. The only time it would kill anything is if it took longer than the timeout period to complete (something like 30 seconds... I forget). I don't always pay attention to how long it takes to stop, but it's entirely possible. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OFFICIAL "SERVER PROBLEMS" THREAD | ewmayer | PrimeNet | 2090 | 2021-01-25 05:05 |
Official AVX-512 programming thread | ewmayer | Programming | 31 | 2016-10-14 05:49 |
Primenet maintenance announcements | Madpoo | PrimeNet | 7 | 2015-11-12 05:50 |
Official Peeved Pets Thread | Prime95 | Lounge | 32 | 2015-10-02 04:17 |
Server maintenance thread | Madpoo | PrimeNet | 9 | 2015-07-25 07:47 |