mersenneforum.org P.C. Poops Latex
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2014-12-05, 13:54 #1 ProximaCentauri     "M49" Dec 2014 Austria 23×3 Posts P.C. Poops Latex In mathematics, Euler's identity (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality e^ i*pi + 1 = 0 Let´s transform this a little bit: add 1 on both sides and square the whole thing. That results in e^-2*pi=1, (shit Latex!) which is apparently false !
2014-12-05, 14:03   #2
rajula

"Tapio Rajala"
Feb 2010
Finland

32·5·7 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ProximaCentauri In mathematics, Euler's identity (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality e^ i*pi + 1 = 0 Let´s transform this a little bit: add 1 on both sides and square the whole thing. That results in e^-2*pi=1, (shit Latex!) which is apparently false !
If you make the trivial calculation you mentioned correctly, you will not get the result you stated.

What is the purpose of this post? To show your mathematical talent? To open again a mathematical discussion? Trolling? Inviting a ban?

2014-12-05, 14:05   #3
science_man_88

"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

23×1,049 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ProximaCentauri In mathematics, Euler's identity (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality e^ i*pi + 1 = 0 Let´s transform this a little bit: add 1 on both sides and square the whole thing. That results in e^-2*pi=1, (shit Latex!) which is apparently false !
$
e^{i\pi} +1 =0$

$e^{i\pi}+2=1$
$e^{2{i\pi}} + 4(e^{i\pi}) +4 = 1$

I must be missing something.

2014-12-05, 14:12   #4
ProximaCentauri

"M49"
Dec 2014
Austria

23×3 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by science_man_88 $ e^{i\pi} +1 =0$ $e^{i\pi}+2=1$ $e^{2{i\pi}} + 4(e^{i\pi}) +4 = 1$ I must be missing something.

No, i was wrong, thx for pointing this out, science_man_88

2014-12-05, 15:38   #5
R.D. Silverman

"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston

5×1,493 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by rajula If you make the trivial calculation you mentioned correctly, you will not get the result you stated. What is the purpose of this post? To show your mathematical talent? To open again a mathematical discussion? Trolling? Inviting a ban?
Showing off his ignorance.

2014-12-05, 19:26   #6
ProximaCentauri

"M49"
Dec 2014
Austria

1816 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman Showing off his ignorance.
Is this You, the famous number theorist J. H. SILVERMAN?

Code:
http://www.math.brown.edu/~jhs/

2014-12-05, 21:32   #7
davar55

May 2004
New York City

5×7×112 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ProximaCentauri Is this You, the famous number theorist J. H. SILVERMAN? Code: http://www.math.brown.edu/~jhs/
Famous? By what standard?

2014-12-05, 22:28   #8
ewmayer
2ω=0

Sep 2002
República de California

267348 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ProximaCentauri Is this You, the famous number theorist J. H. SILVERMAN? Code: http://www.math.brown.edu/~jhs/
Wrong Silverman.

Re. the opening post: Morons shouldn't try to do maths.

Or in your native language: Trotteln sollten nicht formulieren.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post science_man_88 science_man_88 2 2018-07-21 17:11 wildrabbitt Software 7 2018-01-12 19:46 wildrabbitt Math 2 2017-10-30 12:47 jinydu Forum Feedback 2 2007-05-02 11:44 T.Rex Forum Feedback 5 2005-08-29 19:45

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:36.

Fri Aug 19 14:36:08 UTC 2022 up 1 day, 12:04, 2 users, load averages: 1.22, 1.51, 1.53