![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
![]()
37-38 complete, 1 prime already reported. Just one prime...just...one...lone...Cedric got five and henry got two already and I get one. Oh well, that's the randomness of prime distribution for you...
Do you need the lresults? Edit: Ok, I attached the lresults. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2008-07-29 at 22:42 |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
132×61 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Yes, if people can post their lresults, that would be helpful. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
839 Posts |
![]()
Already 1 new prime to report
20436272 38146 |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
112010 Posts |
![]()
40-41 complete
Primes 23727272 40665 16939082 40745 /Lennart |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
![]()
39-40 complete
Primes 32565374 39621 30032708 39872 47807146 39904 /Lennart |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
![]()
41k-42k
Primes 20436272 41381 25095394 41459 27704962 41561 20258534 41706 19450274 41878 /Lennart |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
132×61 Posts |
![]()
I have posted all primes found recently. The 9 k's will be removed from the remaining files shortly.
Lennart, on this effort, I'm only showing the lowest prime found for each k to help in 'balancing' the # of k's remaining. 2 of your k's that had primes already had lower primes so they are not being shown in post 1 of this thread. For everyone, I like to see the lowest prime found for each k so if someone finds a prime in a higher n-range than what you are searching, please leave that k in your file(s) to see if a lower prime is found. Of course it can be removed if you are searching a higher n-range. Edit: All k's with primes have now been removed. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-07-30 at 22:04 |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
![]()
Gary, can you send me the sieve file,
I have one core freed up now :) Also: what is the ideal sieve depth? thanks :) Last fiddled with by michaf on 2008-07-30 at 22:53 Reason: sieve depth question |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
![]()
Taking 42-50 (8 files). ETA ~24 hours.
Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-07-31 at 09:41 |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
241058 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I could send you the file sieved to P=20G now and it would only take a little bit longer to sieve for P>60G. Or I could send you a file sieved to P=60G on Friday. Let me know which you'd prefer. My estimate of the optimum sieve depth for breaking off n=50K-75K would be around P=150-175G but it could be lower...around P=120-130G. The optimum is not going to come in much higher than the optimum for n=25K-50K (P=100G) because there are going to be many less k's remaining. Do you want to sieve from P=60G to P=~150G-175G yourself or do you need help? I assume you know to use srsieve for sieving. If you use more than one core, be sure and use the -f switch for all instances so that it will write out factors for all of them for later removal. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-07-31 at 10:49 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Mar 2004
Belgium
839 Posts |
![]()
38K-39K Range Complete 1 prime found
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sierp base 16 - team drive #1 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 254 | 2014-06-10 16:00 |
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 46 | 2009-10-26 18:19 |
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 199 | 2009-09-30 18:44 |
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2009-03-06 08:41 |
mini-drive for high-n testing on Sierp base 4 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2008-07-16 10:12 |