20191007, 18:34  #100 
Jun 2012
B08_{16} Posts 
Folks probably know this but 2,1084+ has completed 0.5t65, and 2,2150M is currently working on the same level and should complete 0.5t55 in 710 days. I’ve queued up both numbers for another 12,000 curves @ B1=850M. Once that is done, I’ll ask Yoyo if I can kick the job up to 24,000 curves each just to finish it off.
That said, it seems as though Greg is getting ready to queue one or both of these numbers. When he does, I will cease adding more work to the queue and advise Yoyo. Next up for ECM is 2.1165+ (only remaining GNFS and has 43% t65 so far) and 2,1157+. A full t65 will take us into spring at current rate of progress. 
20191007, 20:18  #101  
Nov 2003
1D24_{16} Posts 
Quote:
If one adds prior contributions from Bruce Dodson, EPFL, Peter Montgomery, me, et.al. the total work adds up to quite a bit more than t65. 

20191007, 20:33  #102 
Jun 2012
2^{3}·353 Posts 
Of course! I meant no slight to the previous work, just talking about the work associated with the recent initiative. Sorry if it seemed as if I was ignoring all the contributions to the Cunningham project, certainly not my intent.

20191008, 00:15  #103  
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 
Quote:
I just wanted to make it clear to those who may not be following the work that you were referring to current efforts only. People may not know that a lot of work has been done previously. 

20191008, 06:35  #104 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2^{3}·11·23 Posts 
I'll queue 2,2150M tomorrow. As Bob suspected, 10,313+ will finish soon. I've had little time to devote to the project since the semester started, so things have largely been on autopilot. I'll devote time to bring everything up to date shortly.

20191008, 11:32  #105  
Nov 2003
2^{2}·5·373 Posts 
Quote:
2,2150M can be removed from the queue. Greg says he will start it shortly. Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 20191008 at 11:33 

20191008, 16:24  #106  
Jun 2012
2^{3}·353 Posts 
Quote:
2,1144+ is on my radar. ETA: Yoyo has now killed any future ECM work for 2,2150M. The current WUs can’t be recalled and results will trickle in over the next week or so. Last fiddled with by swellman on 20191008 at 18:20 

20191008, 23:11  #107 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2^{3}×11×23 Posts 
Hmmm. From trial sieving, 2,2150M will take less than a week to sieve.

20191009, 00:05  #108 
Jun 2012
2^{3}×353 Posts 
2,1084+1 has even more ECM completed than 2,2150M if you are looking for another NFS candidate for factoring.

20191009, 17:05  #109  
Nov 2003
16444_{8} Posts 
Quote:
sieve. As a quartic, it is C259 which I thought would be harder than the sextic. If we can do quartics in this range, 2,2230M becomes of interest. 

20191009, 17:07  #110 
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 
Note also that 2,2210M might be easier as a quartic SNFS than via GNFS.....

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Cunningham ECM efforts  pinhodecarlos  Cunningham Tables  7  20171221 13:29 
Cunningham ECM Now Futile?  R.D. Silverman  GMPECM  4  20120425 02:45 
Cunningham Project on YouTube  Batalov  Cunningham Tables  0  20120226 02:58 
Extended Cunningham or so  rekcahx  Factoring  6  20110819 12:45 
Introduction: ECM work done on Cunningham Project composites  garo  Cunningham Tables  2  20050120 10:06 