mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-09-17, 08:28   #23
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

5,309 Posts
Exclamation The plural of "guess" is not "fact"

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
It is my understanding that we don't know this for certain. It is merely an assumption that people seem to take as a known truth.
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-17, 17:53   #24
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

ADC16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
It is my understanding that we don't know this for certain. It is merely an assumption that people seem to take as a known truth.
It's no different than trusting all the other "no factor" TF results.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-17, 17:58   #25
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

530910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
It's no different than trusting all the other "no factor" TF results.
Maybe. But there is a difference in that we can audit results from users doing TF to compare the expected vs discovered factors. It isn't a perfect test of course. However, there is no equivalent test we can apply to the results from TJAOI.
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-18, 00:42   #26
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

2×1,289 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
Maybe. But there is a difference in that we can audit results from users doing TF to compare the expected vs discovered factors. It isn't a perfect test of course. However, there is no equivalent test we can apply to the results from TJAOI.
See my post in the "User TJAOI" thread, where I look at the datestamps for factor discoveries in the PrimeNet database to check how systematic TJAOI's searches are.

Spoiler: from the empirical evidence, it is very systematic. Apart from one glitch almost three years ago, which was quickly fixed, it is indeed true that when TJAOI finishes with a given bit-size range, no new factors of that bit size are ever discovered, by him or by anyone else.

Doing TF for 64-bits or smaller will not find any new factors. Even 65 bits would probably just be a duplication of effort, since we can expect TJAOI to systematically complete that range sometime in 2018.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-26, 04:08   #27
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

279110 Posts
Default

Here is a graph of the number of factored exponents (at least 1 factor) since November 2008 based on the summary files.

factored.png

The top of the chart 30,850,000 is roughly at 20M unfactored exponents (19,997,534).

Unfortunately the slope has gone down during 2017, the averate rate in the last 6 months is 436 exponents per day, which will give 10.1 years to reach 20M unfactored exponents.
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-26, 07:04   #28
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

2,791 Posts
Default

Number of newly factored exponents per day, average over 30 days:

factoredspeed.png

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-09-26 at 07:05
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-26, 14:46   #29
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3×1,423 Posts
Default

Yeah I know its a long way away....but I think it will be done before all exponents are tested up to 100M ... or before we find our find a 100M digit prime.

I just find it interesting to watch.
And if I can knock off a couple dozen ranges over the next year it will be fun.

TeeHeeHee

And thanks for the data.

Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2017-09-26 at 14:47
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-15, 03:56   #30
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

102558 Posts
Default Oct 15, 2017 Update; 1 month later

643 more exponents factored in the ranges of interest....0 - 59.9M
(In ranges where there are still more than 1,999 unfactored.

2 more ranges cleared (now below 2,000): 48.9M and 49.1M
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-17, 05:08   #31
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

102558 Posts
Default November 16, 2017 - 1 month later

800 more exponents factored in the ranges of interest....0 - 59.9M
(In ranges where there are still more than 1,999 unfactored.

2 more ranges cleared (now below 2,000): 46.1M and 49.9M
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-14, 23:26   #32
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

102558 Posts
Default 100 days...100 factors for me.

...
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-17, 22:01   #33
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

3·1,423 Posts
Default December 17,2017 - Monthly Update

841 more exponents factored in the ranges of interest....0 - 59.9M
(In ranges where there are still more than 1,999 unfactored.

6 more ranges cleared (now below 2,000): 1.8M, 2.1M, 45.4M, 47.0M, 47.6M and 48.0M
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking of Joining GPU to 72 jschwar313 GPU to 72 3 2016-01-31 00:50
Thinking about lasieve5 Batalov Factoring 6 2011-12-27 22:40
Thinking about buying a panda jasong jasong 1 2008-11-11 09:43
Loud thinking on irregular primes devarajkandadai Math 4 2007-07-25 03:01
Question on unfactored numbers... WraithX GMP-ECM 1 2006-03-19 22:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:40.

Sat Apr 4 21:40:31 UTC 2020 up 10 days, 19:13, 0 users, load averages: 1.28, 1.50, 1.65

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.