![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
7×13×113 Posts |
![]() Quote:
No problem. I had a power outage for 4 hours in the apartment I'm staying at last night so my sieving won't be done until 4-5 hours from now. Micha, I won't be back to the apt. for > 12 hours so I'll send you the sieved file on Sat. morning. Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1028310 Posts |
![]()
Sieving for n=50K-100K is complete to P=60G. I sent the file to Micha for sieving P=60G-100G. I will be sieving P=100G-150G or whatever optimal depth is for breaking off n=50K-75K.
It should take ~2-3 days on my sieve range unless optimal depth is much higher (unlikely). Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
![]()
I have received the file, and am sieving away.
Results also expected in around 3 days. |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
![]()
Factors for 60-100G sent to Gary (all 2578 of them)
Last fiddled with by michaf on 2008-08-05 at 18:03 Reason: 60, not 50... |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
7×13×113 Posts |
![]()
Very good. Thanks for the help. My 100G-150G range finished yesterday and 150G is past optimum sieve depth so I'll restart the drive for n=50K-75K within the next few hours.
I'll continue sieving n=75K-100K. Optimum depth on it will likely be not much more than P=200G-225G. I'm thinking once we reach n=100K, we can do the same thing for k=50M-100M. For that range, I won't test n=25K-35K. We'll just start right in on a team drive at n=25K after sieving is done. After completing k<100M for n=25K-100K, we can decide as a group how we want to attack both sides of base 3 from there. I'm hoping that KEP will be done with k<500M on the Riesel side within the next month or so and we can attack that instead. I'll follow up with him and see where he is at. I originally started the Sierp attack because it had a lower conjecture at the time. Subsequent programming and testing by others showed that the Riesel side has a lower conjecture. Therefore, maybe it makes more sense to attack the Riesel side once we complete the Sierp side to k<100M and n=100K. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
May 2007
Kansas; USA
7·13·113 Posts |
![]()
The drive has now restarted for n=50K-75K. Files sieved to P=150G are now posted.
I will be sieving n=75K-100K further. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Sep 2004
283010 Posts |
![]()
Taking 50-62 (12 files)..lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
![]()
11785058 50252
46511144 56138 20856328 56338 34960988 56350 |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Jan 2005
479 Posts |
![]()
Taking 62k-63k
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Sep 2004
1011000011102 Posts |
![]()
48886226 51212
3938414 56779 10224166 59777 Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-08-06 at 18:15 |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sierp base 16 - team drive #1 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 254 | 2014-06-10 16:00 |
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 46 | 2009-10-26 18:19 |
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 199 | 2009-09-30 18:44 |
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2009-03-06 08:41 |
mini-drive for high-n testing on Sierp base 4 | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 43 | 2008-07-16 10:12 |