mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

View Poll Results: How many other Twin Mersenne Primes are there besides the three mentioned below?
0 22 84.62%
1 1 3.85%
2 0 0%
More than 2, but finitely many 3 11.54%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-05-31, 10:12   #1
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

175810 Posts
Default Twin Mersenne Primes

There are 3 known "Twin Mersenne Primes":

M3 and M5
M5 and M7
M17 and M19

More precisely, if both M(p) and M(p+2) are both prime, then they are called Twin Mersenne Primes.
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-05-31, 10:44   #2
TTn
 

23·599 Posts
Default

According to general Mersenne's, there cannot be any other twin Mersenne primes. It's pretty simple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-01, 02:16   #3
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

6DE16 Posts
Default

What's general Mersenne's?

Oops, I forgot to include an option for infinitely many.
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 03:07   #4
TTn
 

13×353 Posts
Default

Quote:
jinydu What's general Mersenne's?
Riesel primes(k*2^n-1), with k<2^n.
3 7 11 23 31 47 79 127 191 223 239 383 479 607 863 1087 1151 1279...

With general Mersenne primes the expansion of the exponent n,
is not just about being prime. It's about being the largest exponent yet!

gM =3 7 31 127 1279 3583 5119 6143 8191 ...
n = 2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 13...
  Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 04:21   #5
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2·3·293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTn
Riesel primes(k*2^n-1), with k<2^n.
3 7 11 23 31 47 79 127 191 223 239 383 479 607 863 1087 1151 1279...

With general Mersenne primes the expansion of the exponent n,
is not just about being prime. It's about being the largest exponent yet!

gM =3 7 31 127 1279 3583 5119 6143 8191 ...
n = 2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11 13...
So, how does that show that there are no more twin Mersenne primes?
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 04:42   #6
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

25×71 Posts
Default

It's like a paradox. Twin Mersenne primes would become extremely rare if they even exist after M19, but then again, numbers go on infinetely.
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 05:17   #7
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2×3×293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixfd64
It's like a paradox. Twin Mersenne primes would become extremely rare if they even exist after M19, but then again, numbers go on infinetely.
So that doesn't really prove that there are no further Mersenne primes. After all, a lot of things can happen between 10^2,598,000 and infinity.
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 09:04   #8
TTn
 

122748 Posts
Default

Quote:
So that doesn't really prove that there are no further Mersenne primes. After all, a lot of things can happen between 10^2,598,000 and infinity.

You almost have a point, in that technically all properties of numbers lay beyond mankinds boundries, ie 99.999...% of them.(Guys law of numbers)

But If there is a known mod, then we can safely say that there can be no other primes. This is the case as is proven with RMA.

I'll break it down in my next message.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 13:35   #9
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

3×2,473 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTn
You almost have a point, in that technically all properties of numbers lay beyond mankinds boundries, ie 99.999...% of them.(Guys law of numbers)

But If there is a known mod, then we can safely say that there can be no other primes. This is the case as is proven with RMA.

I'll break it down in my next message.
Hey guys. Everyone, and I do mean EVERYONE would be a lot better off if
they actually took some time to READ about this subject, rather than indulge
in random (and mostly wrong) speculation.

While a proof is lacking there are very good reasons for believing that the
number of twin Mersenne primes is finite and furthermore that we already
know all of them.

There are strong heuristic arguments which suggest that the number of
Mersenne primes between [2^n and 2^2n] is exp(gamma), independent
of n as n-->oo. The arguments strongly suggest that the Mersenne
primes M_p have a Poisson distribution with respect to lg p (log base 2).

If this is indeed the case, then there will be finitely many Mersenne twins.
There can be no more than O(sum(1/log(M_p) * 1/log(M_p+2))) and this sum
CONVERGES over p, let alone over twin prime pairs (p, p+2).

The expected number of twin Mersenne primes that are unknown is no more
than sum (p > 12,441,000 1/log(M_p) 1/log(M_p+2) ) where (p,p+2)
runs over twin prime pairs. This sum is VERY small. 12,441,000 is the bound
below which we are sure there are no more Mersenne primes.

Now can we put these silly arguments to rest?
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 14:19   #10
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

6DE16 Posts
Default

In my opinion, this forum would have a lot to lose if users could only post their mathematical ideas after having read through all the relevant literature, mainly because I think this forum should be open to people of all levels of mathematical knowledge. I don't think there is any real harm done in speculating (even incorrectly), especially because the speculator may learn something. After all, papers are a method for people to communicate theorems, conjectures and ideas; and Internet forums are just another method (albeit less formal and rigorously reviewed).

Furthermore, I do not think that mathematical problems should be put to rest (at least not fully) until they have been rigorously settled with proofs. Aside from the certainty they provide, these proofs often provide new insights and lead to further interesting questions (as in the case of Fermat's Last Theorem).

Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2004-06-02 at 14:20
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-06-02, 15:32   #11
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

741910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu
In my opinion, this forum would have a lot to lose if users could only post their mathematical ideas after having read through all the relevant literature, mainly because I think this forum should be open to people of all levels of mathematical knowledge. I don't think there is any real harm done in speculating (even incorrectly), especially because the speculator may learn something. After all, papers are a method for people to communicate theorems, conjectures and ideas; and Internet forums are just another method (albeit less formal and rigorously reviewed).

Furthermore, I do not think that mathematical problems should be put to rest (at least not fully) until they have been rigorously settled with proofs. Aside from the certainty they provide, these proofs often provide new insights and lead to further interesting questions (as in the case of Fermat's Last Theorem).
They don't need to read through all the relevant literature. They DO need to
at least read the basics of number theory; i.e. a first course book. They
also need to learn how to correctly pose their questions. One can't even
begin to talk about whether there are infinitely many Mersenne primes without
at least knowing basic probability and the definition of a probability density
function. One can't properly discuss a subject without knowing the
language.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mersenne Primes p which are in a set of twin primes is finite? carpetpool Miscellaneous Math 3 2017-08-10 13:47
What to do with 16 digit twin, non-Mersenne primes? RienS Miscellaneous Math 15 2014-11-18 01:48
Twin Primes Hugh Math 64 2011-01-26 08:45
twin primes! sghodeif Miscellaneous Math 9 2006-07-19 03:22
Twin primes again Chris Card Math 1 2005-05-26 14:18

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:46.

Fri Jun 5 06:46:01 UTC 2020 up 72 days, 4:19, 0 users, load averages: 0.90, 1.05, 1.03

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.