Go Back > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Thread Tools
Old 2015-07-17, 15:55   #1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
petrw1's Avatar
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

10010111111002 Posts
Default I see this as a bit of a mathematical curiosity...

Our Team Standings....
We are 8th or 9th in every work category yet 10th overall.
I'm not saying the data is wrong and I do accept it is possible; I just wouldn't expect it to be very likely to happen.

Type	Rank	of	GHz days	Count
TF	9	160	176,585.83	29,370
P-1	9	103	4,380.66	6,654
LL	8	164	73,702.07	486
LL-D	9	165	29,962.90	793
ECM	8	59	2,031.85	2,266
ECMF	8	31	2,320.67	50
Overall	10	246	288,983.99	39,619
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-07-17, 16:06   #2
rajula's Avatar
"Tapio Rajala"
Feb 2010

32×5×7 Posts

Without looking at the stats of high-level teams I would to the contrary find this likely to happen. I would expect some teams with GPU-power to concentrate on TF and some others to do lot of LL-D/LL. For the standings of your team all it would take is one team beating you in TF and total, but losing on other types and one team beating you on LL/LL-D and total, but losing on other types.
rajula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-07-17, 16:31   #3
(loop (#_fork))
fivemack's Avatar
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

22·32·179 Posts

If there are N kinds of work, and N teams each of which do only one kind of work, and you do a tiny bit of all kinds of work, you can easily be second-best in every field and last overall
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-07-18, 12:13   #4
Brian-E's Avatar
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2×3×5×109 Posts

Your table helpfully includes the number of teams from which your ranking is taken in each category and overall. From that measure you can calculate that overall, 10th out of 246, you are just outside the 4 percentile. On that reckoning you do significantly better overall than you do in any of the individual categories.
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-07-19, 02:33   #5
Jayder's Avatar
Dec 2012

2×139 Posts

This reminds me of Simpson's paradox.
Jayder is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A meaningless curiosity fivemack Aliquot Sequences 2 2016-01-17 07:44
Results Curiosity Gordon PrimeNet 1 2015-07-30 06:49
A Curiosity R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2012-05-10 20:00
P-1 question of curiosity JuanTutors Math 3 2004-10-20 04:37
Curiosity ET_ Math 7 2004-02-13 17:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:34.

Wed Dec 8 07:34:54 UTC 2021 up 138 days, 2:03, 1 user, load averages: 2.04, 2.06, 1.78

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.