![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"unknown"
Jan 2019
anywhere
17 Posts |
![]()
A. Joux created in 2013 a new algorithm (index calculus, JIC) for finding a discrete logarithm with time complexity of LQ (1/4, c) for c > 0. Can we find an algorithm for integer factorization with the same time complexity, using JIC?
If yes, then for RSA-1024 it would be several billions times better than GNFS. We have: GNFS will have aprx. 1.4*10^26 operations. JIC will have aprx. 5*10^17 operations for c = (64/9)^(1/3), same c as GNFS. If c = 1, then we will have only 1.6*10^9 operations (!)... For RSA-2048: GNFS 1.61*10^35 operations JIC, c = (64^9)/(1/3) 4.79*10^22 operations (!) JIC, c = 1 6.22*10^11 operations (!!) Is it amazing? Last fiddled with by tetramur on 2019-01-21 at 11:22 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
3×52×131 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
5·709 Posts |
![]()
Nobody knows if there is a way to transfer the recent improvements in discrete logarithms to the integer factorization domain. Note that the kind of discrete logs that can be solved quickly by Joux et al would not appear in actual cryptosystems
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Aug 2006
10111010110112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"unknown"
Jan 2019
anywhere
17 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Elliptic curves QS (only IF?) NFS IC (only DL?) IF and DL are related. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Aug 2006
135338 Posts |
![]()
A general algorithm for discrete logarithms implies an algorithm for integer factorization. But Joux's algorithm isn't general, and so it doesn't directly give rise to a factorization algorithm. It wouldn't be surprising if it did give a factorization algorithm for an appropriately-restricted setting, but it's not at all clear what that would look like, and it probably wouldn't be natural-looking in the integers. Personally I think that it would be worth a paper to do this (and such a paper would likely include an actual factorization). But this is outside my expertise, so I won't be the one writing that paper.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"unknown"
Jan 2019
anywhere
100012 Posts |
![]()
Can method used by Joux et al. be extended with keeping time complexity the same? If yes, how can it be done?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
5×709 Posts |
![]()
Doing that in general prime fields would imply breaking Diffie-Hellman. Predictions are tricky, especially about the future.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Aug 2006
3·1,993 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Whats is a fast algorithm for compute znorder(Mod(2,p)). | JM Montolio A | Miscellaneous Math | 10 | 2019-06-14 03:13 |
amorosi - new fast factorization not deterministic | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 5 | 2018-01-19 11:38 |
18th Test of primality and factorization of Lepore in 5 * log_25 (N) (New Year's algorithm) | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 2 | 2018-01-01 21:31 |
new factorization algorithm | jasonp | Math | 2 | 2012-06-17 20:04 |
Fast factorization method or crankery? | 10metreh | Factoring | 6 | 2010-04-08 11:51 |