Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2003-08-17, 00:37 #1 Wacky     Jun 2003 The Texas Hill Country 108910 Posts The Railroad Puzzles Number 1: Out in West Texas there are many miles of perfectly straight track. Let us assume that some night we go out and select a section of perfectly welded track without any joints. We securely anchor each end of a section that is exactly 1 mile long. The next afternoon is a typical "scorcher" and the sun heats the track causing it to expand. Assume that the one mile of track is lengthened by only one foot (0.02%). Further assume that all the intermediate ties are loose and the track raises vertically to accomodate the extra length. If we allowed the track the make abrupt bends, it could instantly jump up six inches and then abruptly drop six inches to include the extra length. Or it could go up 3 inches, return to the normal elevation and make a second similar 3 inch step. Or it could make 4 steps of 1.5 inches, etc. But, steel rail does not have those characteristics. So assume that it raises up in a smooth circular arc. The high point will be at the middle and it will slowly decend toward each end. The question is: "How high will the midpoint be above its nominal location?"
 2003-08-17, 00:43 #2 Wacky     Jun 2003 The Texas Hill Country 32×112 Posts Number 2: A freight train is exactly one mile long at rest. If it is travelling at 60 miles per hour, how long will it be? PS: This was an actual question on the final exam of a physics course.
 2003-08-17, 01:06 #3 Fusion_power     Aug 2003 Snicker, AL 11101111112 Posts I'll raise one question just for the fun of it. Years ago I was told that railroad track does not expand in the lengthwise direction rather it expands in width and height. Your posted question is based on the length expanding. Am I to presume that this is just a mental exercise, not a question based on fact? On the second question, I presume you are wanting to apply Einsteins equations to the train. Fusion
2003-08-17, 01:27   #4
Wacky

Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country

21018 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fusion_power I'll raise one question just for the fun of it. Years ago I was told that railroad track does not expand in the lengthwise direction rather it expands in width and height. Your posted question is based on the length expanding. Am I to presume that this is just a mental exercise, not a question based on fact?
I think that your "fact" is in error. The steel does not "know" the distinction in "height", "width", and "length". It actually expands in all directions. But the 0.02% expansion in width and height amounts to thousandths of an inch. If is only in the "length" that the cumulative expansion is noticable.

Quote:
 On the second question, I presume you are wanting to apply Einsteins equations to the train.
As I said, this was an actual question on the final exam for a physics class.

Yes, I think that you should consider "The Lorentz Transformation".

2003-08-17, 01:34   #5
wblipp

"William"
May 2003
New Haven

23·5·59 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fusion_power I'll raise one question just for the fun of it. Years ago I was told that railroad track does not expand in the lengthwise direction rather it expands in width and height.
I think you were mis-informed. While it's conceivable that crystals might show differential expansion in different directions, there isn't any way for a cubic millimeter of steel in the middle of the rail to know which way it is oriented. Additionally, if you have ever walked along a railroad track you may have noticed the rails don't touch end to end - somebody thinks it's important to leave an expansion gap. Finally, if this were true, we would bridges out of railroad ties and save all the trouble of expansion joints.

Or perhaps the person was trying to say that the overall length of a multi-rail stretch does not change because the expansion gaps absorb the difference.

2003-08-17, 01:42   #6
Wacky

Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country

44116 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by wblipp Or perhaps the person was trying to say that the overall length of a multi-rail stretch does not change because the expansion gaps absorb the difference.
Note that I specified that it was uniformly welded steel rail. I assume that there are no expansion joints within the interval.

(And after you do the math, you too may wonder just how they make "welded rail" work. In olden days, the "clickity-clack of the railroad track" was because of those gaps.)

 2003-08-18, 04:28 #7 Jwb52z     Sep 2002 77510 Posts How could only going 60 MPH be enough to make the train any longer in a measureable sense? I thought Einstein's theories only dealt with speed at or near that of light.
 2003-08-18, 04:59 #8 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 213658 Posts In regards to puzzle 2: Using a North American style frieght train, we could esimate how much longer the train would be. When the train is stopped it is exactly 5280' long and all the couplers are in the "clopased" state. As the train starts up the engine(s) begin to pull the couplers into the running position. With a rough figure of 3" expansion per coupler. For the purposes of the test figure the 'old fashion' 60' box cars (and engine). This gives us 88 total cars (and engine). Giving 87 couplings. 87 x 3 = 261" = 21.75' 5280 + 21.75 = 5300.75' total length at any non relativistic speed.
 2003-08-18, 05:46 #9 Fusion_power     Aug 2003 Snicker, AL 7×137 Posts Re the train question: Presuming that the train is exactly 5280 feet long at rest and that its length is fixed i.e. it doesn't stretch due to couplings, etc. If the train accelerates to 60 mph, it would shrink by about .0002 feet in length. If it accelerated to 1/2 lightspeed, it would shrink much more dramatically For all practical purposes, the train stays the same length as it approaches light speed, its frame of reference shrinks though so an outside observer thinks the train is shorter. What happens when a relativistic object meets another relativistic object head on? What if a relativistic object (that weighed just one pound at rest) struck the earth doing .8C? Relativistic object is defined as anything moving more than half the speed of light.
 2003-08-18, 09:19 #10 graeme     Jul 2003 41 Posts In terms of relativity the length of the train depends on the frame of reference used to measure it. In the train's frame of reference it is always 1 mile long, no matter how it's moving. In the frame of reference of the tracks, the train would be shorter by three thousands of an inch. But the question doesn't specify which frame you're using so it's meaningless as an exam question (unless you want the answer "it depends"). Puzzles, of course, on the other hand, tend to over or under specify the conditions as part of the puzzle - in this case my answer is "I don't know". Graeme
2003-08-18, 10:25   #11
NickGlover

Aug 2002
Richland, WA

13210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fusion_power If the train accelerates to 60 mph, it would shrink by about .0002 feet in length.
I think you forgot to square v/c. My answer is that at 60 mph, it would shrink by about 2e-11 feet in length.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post science_man_88 Puzzles 0 2011-03-28 17:31 davar55 Puzzles 10 2008-04-09 18:48 fetofs Puzzles 32 2005-10-26 18:32 mfgoode Puzzles 18 2005-07-11 11:51 Orgasmic Troll Puzzles 12 2003-07-16 09:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:29.

Sat Dec 5 15:29:16 UTC 2020 up 2 days, 11:40, 0 users, load averages: 2.46, 2.71, 2.44

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.