mersenneforum.org results not needed
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2015-01-08, 13:22 #1 Mini-Geek Account Deleted     "Tim Sorbera" Aug 2006 San Antonio, TX USA 10000101101102 Posts results not needed Some of the results from my latest TF submission came back as "results not needed". Code: PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70070123 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70070123 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70070237 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70070237 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70191343 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70191343 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70070207 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70070207 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70070249 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70070249 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70213879 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70213879 WAS NOT NEEDED PROCESSING RESULT: NO FACTOR FOR M70214041 FROM 2^73 TO 2^74 [MFAKTC 0.20 BARRETT76_MUL32_GS] ERROR CODE: 40, ERROR TEXT: TF RESULT FOR M70214041 WAS NOT NEEDED I checked on one in particular (assuming they all have a similar story): M70213879 TF from 73 to 74 was assigned to me by GPUto72 on 2015-01-04, then A_Savchenko submitted that result on 2015-01-07. Now, on 2015-01-08, I tried to submit the same result. Did GPUto72 double-assign the work? Did A_Savchenko run work that wasn't assigned to him? I'm not worried about the credit, but I don't want us to be duplicating work.
 2015-09-16, 04:29 #2 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2·3·1,693 Posts I just came home and submitted some TF results on assignments from 72-75. I got several "Not Needed" results, but screwed up the listing before I made note of them. I then checked my remaining assignments and found two in progress which I had from 72-75, but had been done to 74 by Mark Rose. I have cut my losses and modified the remaining assignments. The two which I know to have been mine are 73247971 73247597 but there may have been 3 or 4 Not Neededs.
 2015-09-16, 05:39 #3 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2×3×1,693 Posts These four assignments seem to be the ones involved. I lost 72-74 on the latter two. I may have lost 72-73 on one of the others, and backed out in time on the last. 73247971 73247597 73247021 73247429 EDIT: I hope Mark does not have 73347523 queued up. I do. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2015-09-16 at 06:10
 2015-09-16, 13:23 #4 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 2,953 Posts I have only DCTF work queued at the moment. With the machine issues I had a week ago, it's possible things got screwed up. Chris, can you please check the GPU72 logs for those exponents? If I did step on any toes by doing unassigned work, please move the credit over. Alternatively, I'll gladly do the same amount of work or more and PM the results including any factors found to you so you can submit them and get the credit. Post the assignments here and I'll get started right away.
 2015-09-16, 13:37 #5 kladner     "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2·3·1,693 Posts Thanks for the offer, Mike. I do not think you were at fault. Of course, I don't think I am, either. I don't need the (maybe) 80-100 GHz-d/d to feel fulfilled. It was just a surprise to which I probably over reacted. The question is only how this came to pass.
2015-09-16, 13:45   #6
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter

"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

9,973 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kladner Thanks for the offer, Mark.
Fixed it for you...

2015-09-16, 14:32   #7
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

23×3×439 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose Chris, can you please check the GPU72 logs for those exponents? If I did step on any toes by doing unassigned work, please move the credit over.
Yup, I"m afraid you did step on toes:
Code:
+----------+----------------------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+
| Exponent | User                             | WorkType | Status | FactFrom | FactTo | Assigned            | Completed           |
+----------+----------------------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+
| 73247971 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 |        1 |      1 |       71 |     72 | 2015-03-31 09:49:34 | 2015-04-02 04:13:41 |
| 73247971 | ea39a75de82cd896610be22735054fc5 |        1 |     90 |       72 |     74 | 2015-09-04 17:52:48 | 2015-09-12 06:33:49 |
| 73247971 | 8ad778c87c3d88f688fef4ebad36994c |        1 |      1 |       72 |     75 | 2015-09-12 07:07:40 | 2015-09-16 12:42:36 |
+----------+----------------------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+
The Status of 90 means the candidate was assigned to you, but then you unreserved it 2015-09-12 06:33:49 UTC.

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2015-09-16 at 14:36 Reason: s/would have received/did receive/

 2015-09-16, 14:57 #8 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 1011100010012 Posts Darn it :( Edit: It looks like I removed all my work of a type at one point, including assignments that were already submitted to PrimeNet. I guess GPU72 hadn't picked up all my completed work yet, so I had unreserved work I had already submitted. Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2015-09-16 at 15:00
2015-09-16, 15:25   #9
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

23·3·439 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose I guess GPU72 hadn't picked up all my completed work yet, so I had unreserved work I had already submitted.
Likely scenario. In such cases, it's best to wait at least an hour before unreserving work.

Unfortunately there's no way for GPU72 to know about such situations without hammering Primenet with spidering.

2015-09-16, 16:58   #10

"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Fixed it for you...
Thanks!

EDIT: I have made plenty of confused moves when juggling assignments, some of which undoubtedly messed with someone else's work.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2015-09-16 at 17:02

 2015-09-21, 15:31 #11 airsquirrels     "David" Jul 2015 Ohio 11×47 Posts I just finished http://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/73447019 which I was assigned by GPU72, of course the result wasn't needed... Last fiddled with by airsquirrels on 2015-09-21 at 15:31

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post MatWur-S530113 GPU to 72 10 2017-12-09 15:36 RMAC9.5 PrimeNet 3 2013-06-26 13:16 zeit PrimeNet 3 2008-04-25 08:03 AntonVrba Math 3 2007-03-06 10:55 Prime95 Software 5 2005-06-17 15:54

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:59.

Sat Jun 25 23:59:23 UTC 2022 up 72 days, 22 hrs, 1 user, load averages: 1.39, 1.41, 1.27