mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-08-01, 14:14   #12
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

53×23 Posts
Default

When there are no known factors type 5 is the same as type 1:
a^(N*known_factors-1) vs a^(N-1) because known_factors=1

But you do not need to specify type, just let Prime95/mprime use the default type:
PRP=1,2,84946391,-1



Gpuowl only does type1 still I believe, and unless the input format changed in the last few months it should be:
PRP=<AID>,1,2,84946391,-1,75,0

Gpuowl need the ,75,0 at the end for some reason (unless this has changed lately):

Code:
## worktodo.txt
The lines in worktodo.txt must be of one of these forms:
* 70100200
* PRP=FCECE568118E4626AB85ED36A9CC8D4F,1,2,77936867,-1,75,0
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-01, 14:16   #13
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

53×23 Posts
Default

This one needs a TC: 53301539

But it will be picked up automatically at any time probably.
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-01, 16:49   #14
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

53·23 Posts
Default

Version 30 has the new PRP-VDF where it only needs 1 test and a short proof validation instead of a double check.

But these already has 2 PRP tests, so most likely another one will finish the double check.

Try this:

PRP=1,2,84946391,-1
PRP=1,2,84963899,-1
PRP=1,2,86291299,-1
PRP=1,2,86793229,-1
PRP=1,2,86793251,-1

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2020-08-01 at 16:52
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-02, 00:36   #15
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

836210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
Version 30 has the new PRP-VDF where it only needs 1 test and a short proof validation instead of a double check.
Do you agree that as any new single LL runs that pop up as suspect, that we should just do a fresh PRP on v30? Roughly the same amount of time to run the test, but savings if a LL-TC were needed.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-02, 14:06   #16
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

53·23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Do you agree that as any new single LL runs that pop up as suspect, that we should just do a fresh PRP on v30? Roughly the same amount of time to run the test, but savings if a LL-TC were needed.
Yes, Suspect tests should be run with PRP VDF.
If there is 1 Suspect and 1 Unverified LL I guess if the person really wants they can run LL DC because in most cases probably >95% it will match the non-suspect, but PRP-VDF preferred.
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-02, 15:43   #17
kruoli
 
kruoli's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE

229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
This one needs a TC: 53301539

But it will be picked up automatically at any time probably.
Somehow, it got TF assigned without any need. The exponent is already factored one level farther than GPU72 standard.
kruoli is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-03, 01:04   #18
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,549 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruoli View Post
Somehow, it got TF assigned without any need. The exponent is already factored one level farther than GPU72 standard.
And it is in double-check CAT 1 range, it should not have been assigned for TF through the Manual Testing pages.

Jacob

Last fiddled with by S485122 on 2020-08-03 at 01:06 Reason: added bit about manual testing pages
S485122 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strategic Double Clicking Madpoo Marin's Mersenne-aries 1841 2019-07-16 03:30
PRP triple checks? GP2 Marin's Mersenne-aries 4 2019-03-16 15:31
How often are triple checks released? patrik Data 5 2004-01-31 22:19
How do I get rid of the Triple Checks?? outlnder Lounge 4 2003-04-07 18:06
Triple Checks- How are they disposed of?? outlnder Lounge 6 2003-01-24 22:01

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:23.

Mon Aug 3 09:23:41 UTC 2020 up 17 days, 5:10, 0 users, load averages: 1.20, 1.23, 1.21

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.