mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > storflyt32

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-05-23, 00:20   #122
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24·33 Posts
Default

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001508546635

Should tell that this is a quite heavy one, for that of number, because here it blew the other way, for just a flipover, and here during the week.

But not any reported either, at least from only my side.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001364192184

Here is the familiar number we should be aware of, for just knowing, when that of a "slingshot" number here.

Anyway, I did not try here, from just a recall, but the product of this number should be at least composite, for still not any remainder, when only a flipover for such.

So, just "stupidity killed the cat", for only the other project I could make it, and next only looking around, for only the blow it still could be, when only just knowing.

Just "hi there", and next I could be only sitting here, for only a way to produce, when also deliver, for not any sentence it should be either.

Always the remainder it could be, when also that of a leftover, but for that, we only could be testing a number for that of primality when only such.

I better report the factors, for still just knowing, when also that of possession for just the same.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001510523351

And this one just blew, for only a SIQS for such, meaning that I could be having the factors.

Here a P42 and P43 respectively, and it is a beautiful pair, for only one digit difference in size.

Notice the P38 for just before or preceding, and it becomes quite clear that this is a tight one here for that of pair.

Maybe updating here before I go to bed.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001512173531

P38 = 11177730913469814457434179537581152881

Flips around for that of a P166 when only multiplying here, for that of a loose factor, already known.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001516040929

And here making an entry which in fact is not needed, for only superfluous for such.

Apologies for that.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001512173531


Should tell that I did not know or report the factors here, but only that they were already known.

Therefore redoing here for just orders sake, and it took a little while.

But next, on the other hand, for not any nextprime() it should be either, next I could end up being a jerk for only nonsense for such.

Always the bigger and better, for also a number for such, and next you could sieve, for only extract by only doing so.

Those numbers in between should be almost countless, for also indeterminate as well, and for that, also a lack of being able to quantize, for only the numbers it could be.

So here not just a number in itself, but rather an amount instead, meaning that you should count it separate here.

Just picking a P92 by chance, for also a P38, and it should be a C130 or so, and next it could flip over, for that of the "rest".

Here need scrolling down a little, for perhaps a couple of samples, and next I have not tried it either.

Only exclude 2 perhaps for just a factor on one side, and you could be still left with that of the remaining part of it for just task, when only that of the rest.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517236724

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001516776946

Here keying in the product or composite factor before the first one just above, so here in error once again.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517236310

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517241344

Again my apologies for that, but here again two separate factorizations, making for loose factors here, so why it ends up better at times, I really do not know.

The P41 was already known here, but more that it flips around quite nice here, and next back to the C120.

And not doing that one either, because suspecting it could be quite some bit difficult.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-05-30 at 19:02
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-06-12, 14:07   #123
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24·33 Posts
Default

And since becoming Friday, I have to go to the shop in just a moment.

But here flipping around for that of the "Magic number", and getting two factors here for which not any reported either or yet, but one is a P153, the other a P154.

Here it becomes just 3 and 7 in between each way, but also that it does not make for anything else, when larger numbers concerned, also when multiplied.

Here I did such a thing for that of RSA-2048, and chose to terminate, for not any successful.

It only becomes a composite number once again, for only the small ones preceding it.

If making it any (2^4096+1), for just the (10^1132-1) it should be instead, you could end up with at least some 999999... for that of digits.

But next, any prime versus composite for such, and needs checking here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000037527501

Just in the middle of the day here, but making it that of 1132 here, for that of digits, for also number of digits for the same.

But here interesting for that of factors being added, for only primes for such it still could be, for only the added context for still only being a composite number here.

Report a couple of dozen of such PXXX for not any PYYY either, and next multiply it for that of a sequence, and still only a composite number as the result.

So here thinking I rather should go for (2^8192+1) or (2^16384+1) for each separate factorization, when still not any prime for just he 9999999.. it could be here, when only 1133 digits.

Only doing so, for each one you could be having, and it becomes that of complete factorization, for also the separation it could be, next between numbers.

So perhaps not separation here either, but only that you could be having it in full, for only the complete factorization it still could be.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001526311122

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001526311202

Making this entry right now, from the P35, P47, P51 and P56, in the previous, for the product it should be, and I could be giving a hand on the C121 here for just trying it out.

And should tell that when back from the shop, in fact I made it wrong with just one digit in the previous, and should be (10^1133) instead, and not mine here either.

Here needs a redo of the whole thing in order to get it in order, because of the usual confusion, when that of potentiation.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000032382979

The problem is still that when these numbers for only factors are reported separately, for also individually, or just in pairs, for being that of a product, it becomes composite.

One such flipover makes it for a P31 or so, and I could have it later on, unless breaking in the meantime.

I will try fix that later on, for shortening it a little.


And here should tell that I found something interesting perhaps, for still the "unfriendly" or opposite project it could be.

First, this is still unofficial, but I bumped a number a little, for that of factorizing for such, but next multiplying, I ended up with a P368.

Flipping it over, for already knowing it with the C617 for that of our secrecy, doing the same with the C1133 of the once again the other project.

Here becoming 2, 929, 37139, 58567, and next a PRP753, and that is to my knowledge, pretty close here.

And here guessing that it could be still that of bit value for only that of worth, except not having the correct syntax here, for perhaps only depth.

Just fill it up, and next only the throat it should be, for not any Abyss, when rather numbers merging together, for only being combined, or perhaps merged.

But only for simplicity, adding 368 with 753 here, and it becomes 1121, for not that far off from that of C1133 here.

And yes, I already know that this project is still about finding the largest number possible, for also the obstacles or hindrances during the way.

Next, sweet dreams, for only just such a thing, and it could be a C147 here as well, for still also the C1133, for where it could be an intersection for just a meeting, when not any kiss either.

But closer, could also be that of nearer, for only the double or dual factors it could be, when that of the encounter it could be, for only closing in on each other.

Both the factorization of the C147, for also the C1133 it could be, next could be such a kiss, for only a sweetheart for such, when also the place we also could meet, and next celebrate.

We already know that there should not be any single sequence for only the numbers we could get, but only that they could relate to each other, for only given context.

Losing my hands, as you already should know, but most of it made it to the logs, for that of subsequent reporting.

So here just slightly behind for that of such, and it could be waiting to the morning for such a thing being done or carried out, but here only knowing we could be quite near to it right now.

And for just the funny part of it, translating "proximity" here, for only the nearness it could be.

Links for this coming up when posted, and readily available.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-06-13 at 04:34
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-06-19, 02:13   #124
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24×33 Posts
Default

Should I write this or the following, or it was just found in the buffer, for that of posting.

Always that number only found first, and next it becomes a sequence, for only just following.

Here doing so, and a couple of new factors being added to my list.

So here perhaps not any strain or burden it could be, for only difficulty instead, when that of factoring a number for only the "respective" it should be.

P42 = 156444701493908092603269393203296092219791

P87 = 243278622042745394478439429339422038392796511630770812150824481463051381895367502662169

So just give me a laugh for not having tried that yet, except that the product could still flip around for just the other side, becoming just the same.

Problem here is that it becomes just a composite number on one side, for also that of a bit, or particular factorization, on just the other side.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001530305329

More this one instead, because here flipping around from RSA-2048 with a P21 and P350, but not added yet.

Anyway, or perhaps a gamble instead, when only adding the P42 and P87, for not any multliplying it should be either.

Next, so long, for not just how many factors, and also different they might be.

Need to add perhaps a P40 here. for only missing the whole thing, for perhaps not stealing the show it should be either.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001528616314

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000193442616

Next multiplying here for that of a product, and next flipping around, for that of RSA-2048, still for that of our secrecy.

The second link above once again that of RSA-768, for perhaps a bit forgotten.

Here it works, but no point adding the product here, for only the flipover instead, and it becomes a P12 here at first.

Next a P29, followed by a P261, and the whole thing takes just five minutes to complete.

Adding the link in a short while, if not there already.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001532974195

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001532974448

Here should tell that I went for a restart of the computer, while still the summer heat just everywhere.

But next getting a P40 and P42 for the first one for just close or nice pair, when rather it should be the square root instead.

Doing that at first, here five small ones at first, next a P14 and P19, and finally a P36 and P78, for not that difficult either.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000832165672

Total factoring time = 810.7304 seconds

Continuing with the C226 in the second link, because any trial factoring on what I got here, did not became tried out yet.

Also that the P78 should be flipped around for that of the C147 being of much interest, so here also another thing to do.

But still that this needs to be reported, and doing so after sunset, when also the weekend shopping being done.

Anyway, here should tell I chose to run the (3329*2^3388472-1) for that of number, using the syntax pfgw64 -q"(3329*2^3388472-1)" here.

Should be the syntax alone here, for better specified, but also that this also became mentioned at PrimeGrid.

Only for that little "-" in the syntax, I could read it as being a Mersenne number here, for not any 321 LLR, or Riesel number either.

But next excluding any 321, for only the 3 it could be at first, for still only a Riesel number instead.

Here the Subproject status for that of The Riesel problem it could be still, for only Statistics, is choosing not to include this number for any k, but rather excluding it.

Did I just or at one time find a PRP12000+ for only just forgetting all about it, and not having the number either?

If perhaps so, it was a subnumber of sorts, for being in the middle of the scale, for still not being reported before, but next thinking it could be part of the Mersenne factors
for only the number it could be still.

Anyway, still trying here, for only the summer heat still around, but also that there could be published results at mersenneforum.ca for this.

If this rather should be +1 instead, it could be that of a Proth number only for such, but instead only -1, for not knowing where it should go.

Here testing it out, and noticing that it became a restart from an already stored number or result, and in the summer heat, just forgetting the correct name.

But here at 3220000/3388483 for still only a restart, and I could try getting back at it, when the task becomes finished.

pfgw64 -q"(3329*2^3388472-1)"
PFGW Version 3.7.7.64BIT.20130722.Win_Dev [GWNUM 27.11]

Resuming at bit 3002509
(3329*2^3388472-1) is 3-PRP! (1264.0695s+0.0043s)

I better start a new one here before continuing.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-06-23 at 19:36
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-06-23, 20:04   #125
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24×33 Posts
Default

And doing so, for just a new one, but of course keyed it in the wrong way for that of a sequence, for only a P139 at first, followed by a P108.

Here the gap in between, for just the C309 it could be still, should be larger with the P108, for only back up in the list, for more previous.

Sorry about that, for only just missing it during the summer heat, because the flipover should take more time to complete, for still back up in the list it should be.

Next should add that after the dinner here, I may have been correct after all, for that of reporting sequence or order.

Here it becomes the P42 from a previously reported number, and next a pair, for that of the P40, which for the output, becomes that order.

So for pair, it also could become just square number of just factor, like 5*5=25, for example, but not necessarily deliberate or intended.

This because here any Option base for that of factoring, could have been removed, for at not least seeing it here.

Only just C79 = 2113395029955931104026722685159424388853341320601905118980913674681708691674001 for that of output,
and it becomes the pair of P40 factors, as already mentioned.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001533523990

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001533524870

Here not even a SIQS for this, but only straight on, for still any ecm only cumbersome, and taking some time, and still for only the P139 here.

Again not any large here, but also a similar pair earlier on, which could be continued, for only ending up quite large in the end.


And here could add that for the "magical number" still being worked on, for that of RSA-1024, here P1 = 3, for also two factors, when also flipping around.

Checking, and it becomes a P126 here, versus a P182 for this.

I have to add it later here for that of links, because here also a couple of other things as well.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001534829890

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001534830026

Here a semiprime for just being found, and here end factors for only such, but the second just got straight on, when next flipping it around the opposite way.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001536017747

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001536029290

Here for just the way or order of sequence it just became reported, but should tell that the P36 could be more difficult to get at here.

And for only walking upwards, for that of (2^127-1), (2^127+1), (2^255-1), (2^255+1), (2^511-1) and (2^511+1), noticing a close pair, for that of (2^511-1), which I choose not to do.

But here the flipover, for that of the rest of it, still has to be added, for a new factor here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001536031130

Adding a P12, the remaining C170 is once again a hard one, for not any easy to factorize.

Only just in the middle of the crowd, for not any worth mentioning, it also became some slightly larger ones, which still have to be reported.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_elimination

Any X*Y for perhaps not any possible, and still the remainder for just the flipover, and it becomes just the Method of elimination here instead.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1000000000012150535

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001536033734

The first link reads as (2^511+1) here, for also the full number being used, but flipping around, I once again have to add the P16, for becoming the P190 at the end.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001536041208

So if adding the P35 already known for also here, next back at a C123 for which I guess factors are already known, for perhaps not any loose factors either.

But here waiting until I have it, for still only a method being chosen for that of being the right or correct one, when still quite a few of them.

Checking again, and it becomes (2^511-1) here for that of end factors, but once again only the number for that of in full.

Honestly, but if this could be still only loose factors a couple of times, we still could not get at it for only the result we could be wishing for.

If I could take a million factors, for not any more either, next multiplying, for that of dividing with the total number of such factors, I could get an average, for that of statistical mean.

But if next doing so, it could be that of congruence, when not any coinciding either, for just my bad english.

Any secret number only for such, and it should not be the Euler constant here either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%...eroni_constant

Making it any statistical mean, for just an average instead, and I should have mentioned it before, for just the other formula it could be.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001538046853

So having the evening right now, I could report this before eyes getting closed, but here could be just rear-ended, for that of the flipover it also could be.

Meaning that it could be end factors here, for something larger, which has yet to be reported, and it should be taken notice of that.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001538048403

And for just a bad start, once again keying in the wrong order for that of sequence, and please have me excused, because here a bit of work on doing this.

This number got fully factored, but also here the rear end, for that of doing it the other way first.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001538050982

The same also here, for adding a P36 and P37, for also a P75 it could be at the end, for still doing the same thing, namely factoring.

Here coming up shortly, for still not being reported here, but took a little while getting at.

The problem here is that if perhaps making it a SIQS here, for that of a C112, it could be just two factors for only the end sequence it could be, when only result instead.

Next running forever, and here not knowing how long it could take.

Here adding it, for only meant to be, for still perhaps a bit difficult here, and using nfs(number) for only getting a hand on it.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001538049120

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001538049217

The first one here only loose factors for what I could make it, and the other a regular factorization of numbers.

Wohoo, for still not anywhere there yet, at least for only numbers or their sake it perhaps could be.

And here perhaps should not have added the factors in the first one above, for only a bit tight.

The only reason for doing this, is when it flips around, for becoming fully factorized also the other way, becoming the second link above.

Only for climbing up a stairs, I could still multiply by just 2, for not any adding, for still the fallback it could be, when only the opposite way.

But next only becoming 2 as the first factor, for still the remaining perhaps known.

Perhaps it could be just fine for only running the SGS tasks at PrimeGrid, for still a couple of primes known, but here only a double-checker on one such task.

But next the gigantic prime I came across, vanished from my sight, for not being visible again, and here it could also be a megaprime as well.

This because first adding a PRP1764, which became a P1764, for another P23 being extracted from a C1786, for still (2^48853-1) here.

Here my first one such, for that of a titanic prime, so where it could go next for still the larger, could be an open question.

So if still remembering just that P1764 for only the work being carried out, also the remaining C12593 is that ugly beast that never will become factorized.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-07-04 at 19:55
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-11, 00:58   #126
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24×33 Posts
Default

Better making a new one here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001542693147

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001542693436

Here adding factors for both these ones.

Next my bad for keying in the flipover number before either the factors here, or even the complete number, and sorry about that.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001542692955

And not keying in the product, for that of the end factors here, for only the same old story.

The C87 does not take the SIQS, so using ecm instead, and checking in tomorrow, for that of the answer.

Anyway, got that fixed, for only so good, next better.

We know that for only what the corresponding it could be, also that of "adjoining" as well, for only hanging together.

But next, flip a P121 (read my lips) with the remainder (C309 / P121), and next not any easy feat here either.

Only easy on just one side, and next difficult on the other, for still the other half it could be.

Here the "best" numbers we could have, still perhaps not enough, for only the factorization it still could be.

Anyway, did the weekend shopping earlier on, so here not any nonsense either.

The problem here is those factorizations that still remains, and is no simple answer for.

Flipping the possible answer for what you could get, only back in the same mud, for that of the bunch it still could be.

So here not any simple rule either, for only the answer it still could be.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001544729922

Should I tell you a secret, for only an unncessary factorization instead?

I think regardless of just composite or perhaps prime at the end, for only the numbers preceding, not always those good ones either.

The better one I did before actually reporting, but here also my fingers, for also updating a new motherboard with both processor and cards.

I could add the link for this, for also the factorization, before going to bed.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001544050321

And not the two ones listed there already, for that of loose factors of sorts, or maybe just dividing.

Total factoring time = 124822.4619 seconds

A bit of trouble getting the mouse at working, so a bit slow right now.

The worst thing that could be happening, is that PXX*PYY for what you know, and next the flipover does not work.

The reason here is that it divides, or factors, into yet a composite number which is hard to factorize.

Here I give it five or ten minutes at most, for perhaps returning a P30 or so, but next break it off, for that of no success.

So why it factors into a possible prime on each side, for that of the respective part on just the other, I really do not know.

But only just "many to many" for still only what you could know, and next also replication for such a thing, for not any larger either.

Any heated or stuck debate, should still not be any result you could expect, for also accomplish.

Only the closer it could be for that of result, and also the reason for it, when just behind.

Here the tarding or tardent it perhaps could be, for only that of weight, should perhaps not be any simple or mediocre either.

Just balance instead, for making it even, and perhaps no such thing either, when still only different numbers.

But here perhaps more lightly instead, for not any mediocre it still could be.

If I could be stuck on just 2, let it happen for only such, for not any (2^4096+1) instead.

So except for still not any hostile bid, when only project for such, we also know that it "ain't" be working, or could be working.

Just tell me on the spot that any trial division you could get, also could be a Fermat divisor, and next no such thing either.

One thing could be still weighted, for that of the mentioned number, but next it perhaps still does not any divide.

And yes, for not any "stupidity kills the cat", next how many instead, for that of a produce, or maybe just PXX* PYY instead.

Make it a set preference, or just reference, also an interval as well, for just inside, or where it is, or could be, for that of residing.

So here you do not exclude any factors for only what you do not know, only because they are within such a perimeter or range, for just given.

Here new factors for just added, except still within a circle for only just given, being that of a whole of sorts.

For starters, here is my first number for only just known, and for that a 309 digit composite number.

Next flip it around, for perhaps a P54 versus P76, and next the other way, or flipover, could be just easy.

But only knowing that these could be excluding factors, for just running out in nowhere, for that of possible significance.

Only the remaining prime factor becomes important here, for that of dividing with the rest of the number, for the flipover it still could be.

Ask me how the C119 fares with the rest of it, for just part, and still only trying here, for still not any weighted.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001542684009

Not a good sentence just above, so let me try it out instead.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001549704492

Anyway, I did start up here for just continuing, and should tell that just the factors came along already from the start.

The rest of it is not any doable right now, for just the computer wanting to restart or reboot, for some unknown reason.

Here a P33, P43, and P41, in that order, and I could try make it in before too late, for also that of stuck fingers.

Hmm, the C113 still needs the SIQS here, and just working on that, for only the numbers it still could be.

Hold on, for just your breath, because here not any simple or simplicity at all, for just easy.

Or maybe that said, for only doing so, when still first hand here, and still not any easy.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-07-24 at 05:47
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-07-27, 22:49   #127
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

24×33 Posts
Default

A new one perhaps here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001551581865

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001551585275

Here should tell that it broke for just the both it could be here, and next the second first, for only the first having pretty good factors, namely a P38 and a P60.

The second is having a PRP113 at the end, becoming a P113, and here only from memory, for just having the bottle of soup first.

Read my postings at Seti@home, if you are any familiar, and here replacing the power supply with a 1500W instead, for also that of Type 3 cables towards the motherboard.

But next also an Intel 10920X right now, for that of a processor, for still looking up the motherboard, for that of type or brand.

Next still only one GTX1080 card inserted, closest to the fan, but also an airflow just above, for that of three fans, and also quite noisy.

I could also be adding the other GTX1080 card later on, but will have to turn off the computer once again, for also daylight in the room.

Perhaps I could think making it for that of possible LLR tasks, for that of Mersenne it could be instead, except still only one fan blade inserted, for that of the processor fan.

The bad thing here was that of the single processor fan being inserted, when unpacked from the box, but next having to pull it, for only attaching it to the motherboard.

I better should be adding the second fan blade as well, but still that of daylight needed, for only doing just that.

But just turning on the power, for that of the green light on the power supply, perhaps still not any sun shining, for only a moment of pleasure instead, because next only "Bingo" here,
when noticing it could be working.

Fixing the last line here, but first the bottle of hot soup.

Again, needs checking for that of the question mark it could be still above, for not any speculating instead, for only the complete number it perhaps could be.

If I knew that just RSA-1024 could be factorized, for still only the 309 digits it could be, next not any complete number for only a factorization, for still such a part it could be.

It reminds me of Seti@home here, for still that of "complete" it should be, but if rather RSA-2048 instead, for that of a 617 digit number, next we could be knowing it
for just the part it still could be, for only just wishing.

Make it only PrimeGrid instead, for that of the continued story it could be for that of sieving, and only new or progressive numbers for still the sequence it rather could be.

So here not the details in front of me, but you could be making it a new batch for that of Set of factors still in the way of processing, for only the carried out, or undertaken it could be.

Here that of sieving for only an Interval for such, except only range instead, when perhaps still not any wrong.

Again that I could add the second graphics card here, for already mentioned, but needs off with the airflow, for also the first card inserted, and next during the day.

Still quite good factors here, but also that I could be trying out LLR for just the Mersenne number it could be.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001552509149

Here as well, for only chosen or picked at random, for still the end numbers perhaps discernible, for only recognizable for such, and here adding the P17 at first.

Next a P25, P34, and P103, for that of the following, and the whole thing next in 594.8492 seconds.

Could have my cake first, but next a couple of factors that could be added here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001554029297

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001554029336

Here all the factors with the little superscript, was added in the second one, and the latter two are pretty good ones.

But next that the C153 in the first example, is still composite, for only the remainder it still is.

If I knew a number only to be consisting of just RSA numbers for making them up, also that these ones are distinct or separate, for only the specific it should be.

Here all or most of these being laid out in a sequence, for perhaps multiplied, but next we know that it still should not any divide.

The problem with just "Waltzing Mathilda", is perhaps I should mention it at the top for only a Rhyme for such, except not any numbers in pair, for also combined.

Here RSA-768 multiplied with RSA-1024, should be such a pair, for still only CF in the Factor Database, and next also having to check.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001554081346

And here, by the way, is an error with Yafu that I could find, because it never finds or reports the P12 here, except still only the wrong number.

Continuing from what is being reported instead.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001554102479

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001554327536

Here meeting perhaps a wall, for only the dead end street it could be, for still not any getting it to run here, for only that of factors for such.

So here just the second one passing 480/4480 curves here right now, with ETA at 57.27 hours, for also the ecm it perhaps could be, for that of the first one.

That of making it just large numbers for still only the composite it could be, and next it could be meeting in the middle, for only a handshake instead.

This goes to show that for only the primality it still could be, for only dividing between numbers, also that of composite numbers, for just large, when still only in between, for also coming before.

Here I do not know if this could be still working, for only the nice factors being found just earlier on, for still that of today.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-08-01 at 13:33
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Previous Miss? R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2009-11-14 19:57
Using long long's in Mingw with 32-bit Windows XP grandpascorpion Programming 7 2009-10-04 12:13
I think it's gonna be a long, long time panic Hardware 9 2009-09-11 05:11
UPDATED: The current pre-sieved range reservation thread and stats page gribozavr Twin Prime Search 10 2007-01-19 21:06
Ram allocation (in Re: previous thread) JuanTutors Marin's Mersenne-aries 1 2004-08-29 17:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:43.

Mon Aug 3 09:43:18 UTC 2020 up 17 days, 5:30, 0 users, load averages: 1.12, 1.22, 1.23

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.