Is _that_ a proof of the strong (binary) Goldbach conjecture

[Tatenda]

This is a follow up post to:

https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=28154

concerning my proposed proof of the binary Goldbach conjecture for even integers congruent to 2 mod 4. I think I might have found a proof of the full conjecture. Kindly see:
https://figshare.com/articles/prepri...cture/21342042

Your constructive comments are most welcome.

Sincerely,

Tatenda.

[Tatenda]

Revised (more rigorous) version.

[Tatenda]

Originally Posted by Tatenda

This is a follow up post to:

https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=28154

concerning my proposed proof of the binary Goldbach conjecture for even integers congruent to 2 mod 4. I think I might have found a proof of the full conjecture. Kindly see:
https://figshare.com/articles/prepri...cture/21342042

Your constructive comments are most welcome.

Sincerely,

Tatenda.

To those that added the third option on the poll: I didn't create the poll as a way of validating my proof. Rather, the poll is meant to be a quick way to see how many people think the proof is actually correct.

Originally Posted by Tatenda

Revised (more rigorous) version.

Nice approach, but I'm not qualified enough to say anything conclusive about it. Best wishes.

[Dr Sardonicus]

Originally Posted by Tatenda

Revised (more rigorous) version.

So you found that your original "proof" was wrong within about 10 hours after you posted it.

I hope you're not expecting anyone to take this seriously.

[Tatenda]

I nevee said the first proof was wrong. I just found a way to improve the result and I uploaded it. Clearly, your tone is that of a mere hater, and no one should ever waste time trying to convince haters.

[Tatenda]

Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus

So you found that your original "proof" was wrong within about 10 hours after you posted it.

I hope you're not expecting anyone to take this seriously.

I never said the first proof was wrong! I always work hard to improve/generalize my results as much as possible, and this is exactly what i did! Clearly, your tone is that of a hater, and i shouldn't waste my time trying to convince mere haters.

If my post is not interesting to you, simply skip it rather than corrupting it with your hate-filled comments. To maintain the sanity of this thread, I won't reply anymore to your nonsense.

[Batalov]

Originally Posted by Tatenda

I never said the first proof was wrong! I always work hard to improve/generalize my results as much as possible, and this is exactly what i did! Clearly, your tone is that of a hater, and i shouldn't waste my time trying to convince mere haters.

If my post is not interesting to you, simply skip it rather than corrupting it with your hate-filled comments. To maintain the sanity of this thread, I won't reply anymore to your nonsense.

MOD WARNING: you are hate-mongering, not the person who raised a valid question. Stop accusing other people with inflammatory remarks or you could face a temporary educational ban.

Your behaviour is even more nonsensical given the fact that you wrote not just one, but two messages arguing with a forum moderator (color: red)
____

Oh, it gets better! - You also created a sock puppet to praise your own work?! Outstanding! -->

Originally Posted by Primon

Nice approach, but I'm not qualified enough to say anything conclusive about it. Best wishes.

For that, let's start with a ban for 2 weeks.