20170407, 14:37  #1 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
1011011101110_{2} Posts 
New factorization method
I came across this today. I assume that it is fairly crankish. It seems to have similarities to pollard rho as far as I can see.
http://www.datasciencecentral.com/pr...rningapproach 
20170407, 14:56  #2  
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
2^{6}×131 Posts 
Quote:


20170407, 15:43  #3  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
11C0_{16} Posts 
Quote:
The demonstration was on a number with 12 decimal digits. Using Excel Spreadsheet would seem to limit its utility to numbers with no more than 15 decimal digits. I'm not an expert, but aren't RSA moduli are a bit larger than that? 

20170407, 16:55  #4 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
9,433 Posts 
Even if it is inefficient or wrong it is definitely art (see Fig.4)!

20170413, 12:41  #5  
May 2003
248_{10} Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
improving factorization method  bhelmes  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  7  20170626 02:20 
B1 and B2 in P1 method  Miszka  Math  13  20131227 20:23 
New Method  Unregistered  Miscellaneous Math  14  20130524 10:55 
Fast factorization method or crankery?  10metreh  Factoring  6  20100408 11:51 
Suzuki Method  Xyzzy  Hobbies  7  20080403 14:47 