Strategic Double Clicking - Page 157

ATH · 2018-05-14, 21:53

Oh sorry, I did not realize it was your results from 2011/2012, I assumed you did the recent tests

Madpoo · 2018-05-16, 03:29

Here's a fresh list... been a while since I generated one.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	worktodo
49338631	3	0	1	DoubleCheck=49338631,73,1
48170179	2	1	1	DoubleCheck=48170179,73,1
56452489	2	1	2	DoubleCheck=56452489,73,1
53220901	6	3	2	DoubleCheck=53220901,73,1
53693557	6	3	2	DoubleCheck=53693557,73,1
48054023	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=48054023,73,1
44919103	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=44919103,73,1
48021133	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=48021133,73,1
53209469	1	1	4	DoubleCheck=53209469,73,1
53244671	1	1	4	DoubleCheck=53244671,73,1
53262973	1	1	4	DoubleCheck=53262973,73,1
47857427	1	0	3	DoubleCheck=47857427,73,1
50065693	1	0	3	DoubleCheck=50065693,74,1
50067271	1	0	3	DoubleCheck=50067271,73,1
46657007	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=46657007,73,1
55613359	1	0	3	DoubleCheck=55613359,73,1
56971351	1	0	3	DoubleCheck=56971351,73,1
44555123	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=44555123,73,1
53752333	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=53752333,73,1
53752411	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=53752411,73,1
53803909	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=53803909,73,1
53809909	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=53809909,73,1
46997201	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=46997201,73,1
48140947	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=48140947,73,1
48903901	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=48903901,73,1
53067347	1	1	5	DoubleCheck=53067347,73,1
53084041	1	1	5	DoubleCheck=53084041,73,1
47871751	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=47871751,73,1
50436343	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=50436343,73,1
51493367	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=51493367,73,1
47934023	3	3	3	DoubleCheck=47934023,73,1
47934053	3	3	3	DoubleCheck=47934053,73,1
48061693	3	3	3	DoubleCheck=48061693,73,1
48098579	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=48098579,73,1
48194297	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=48194297,73,1
50029663	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=50029663,75,1
51191279	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=51191279,73,1
44435179	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=44435179,73,1
47982943	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=47982943,73,1
46827643	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=46827643,73,1
51652343	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=51652343,73,1
54192319	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=54192319,73,1
54193361	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=54193361,73,1
54687257	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=54687257,73,1
54697271	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=54697271,73,1
54697589	1	0	11	DoubleCheck=54697589,73,1
47658943	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=47658943,73,1
46857169	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=46857169,73,1
47192567	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=47192567,73,1
49248469	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=49248469,73,1
49368733	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=49368733,73,1
49331197	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=49331197,73,1
56356529	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=56356529,73,1
46479337	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=46479337,73,1
47988641	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=47988641,73,1
47993807	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=47993807,73,1
49612637	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=49612637,73,1
48050047	3	4	1	DoubleCheck=48050047,73,1
53203279	3	5	1	DoubleCheck=53203279,73,1
56075977	3	5	9	DoubleCheck=56075977,73,1
56077591	3	5	9	DoubleCheck=56077591,73,1
56639827	3	5	9	DoubleCheck=56639827,73,1
56757367	3	5	9	DoubleCheck=56757367,73,1
56954519	3	5	9	DoubleCheck=56954519,73,1
55747099	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747099,73,1
55747343	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747343,73,1
55747357	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747357,73,1
55094381	3	5	6	DoubleCheck=55094381,73,1
55094587	3	5	6	DoubleCheck=55094587,73,1
55094861	3	5	6	DoubleCheck=55094861,73,1
56372383	3	5	6	DoubleCheck=56372383,73,1
56372419	3	5	6	DoubleCheck=56372419,73,1
52657963	1	2	5	DoubleCheck=52657963,73,1
52693981	1	2	5	DoubleCheck=52693981,73,1
50448733	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=50448733,73,1
50311271	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=50311271,73,1
50558293	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=50558293,73,1
48194101	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=48194101,73,1
50929397	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=50929397,73,1
49721587	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=49721587,73,1
48064637	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=48064637,73,1
46199191	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=46199191,73,1
46584749	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=46584749,73,1
46954541	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=46954541,73,1
53239229	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=53239229,73,1
53357587	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=53357587,73,1
55324459	1	2	9	DoubleCheck=55324459,73,1
47933653	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=47933653,73,1
47223947	2	4	1	DoubleCheck=47223947,73,1
47409121	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=47409121,73,1
47920463	1	2	3	DoubleCheck=47920463,73,1
50148739	1	2	3	DoubleCheck=50148739,73,1
55251473	2	4	1	DoubleCheck=55251473,73,1
54929429	1	2	6	DoubleCheck=54929429,73,1
54929837	1	2	6	DoubleCheck=54929837,73,1
54931127	1	2	6	DoubleCheck=54931127,73,1
54932029	1	2	6	DoubleCheck=54932029,73,1
54938327	1	2	6	DoubleCheck=54938327,73,1
52855423	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=52855423,73,1
57799921	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=57799921,74,1

rudi_m · 2018-05-16, 09:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a fresh list... been a while since I generated one.

I took all which wasn't assigned already.

LaurV · 2018-05-16, 14:07

The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.

petrw1 · 2018-05-16, 14:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.

Yay...that will directly help my "little" project here.

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22476

ATH · 2018-05-16, 15:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

Yay...that will directly help my "little" project here.

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22476

Here are some factoring stats if you are interested:
http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html

I have been archiving the report from https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/
and my script now automatically sum all the columns and compare to my old archive and generate that report.

kriesel · 2018-05-16, 15:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATH

Here are some factoring stats if you are interested:
http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html

Very nice.

How does PRP figure in the stats, if at all?

ATH · 2018-05-16, 18:00

PRP and PRP DC are currently included in the LL and LL-D columns. I do not know if there are future plans to make PRP columns?

rudi_m · 2018-05-16, 20:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.

Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)

Mark Rose · 2018-05-16, 21:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by rudi_m

Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)

Don't forget the P-1 relevant-ranges, too. I believe that's where most of the TF is currently happening.

petrw1 · 2018-05-16, 21:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by rudi_m

Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)

That's a fair point; however, at www.gpu72.com Chris is managing the LL-TF and DC-TF ranges.

If I understand correctly they are taking the current LL-relevant ranges at least as deep as recommended for GPUs and they are a fair bit ahead.

About a year ago Chris started discussion on What to do next:
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22480

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic	Mysticial	Software	51	2021-04-18 18:12
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page	marigonzes	Information & Answers	2	2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th?	jasong	jasong	7	2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1?	137ben	PrimeNet	6	2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume.	Uncwilly	Puzzles	8	2006-07-03 16:02

2018-05-14, 21:53	#1717
ATH Einyen Dec 2003 Denmark 17×181 Posts	Oh sorry, I did not realize it was your results from 2011/2012, I assumed you did the recent tests

2018-05-16, 14:07	#1720
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 83·113 Posts	The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :) Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.

2018-05-16, 18:00	#1724
ATH Einyen Dec 2003 Denmark 17·181 Posts	PRP and PRP DC are currently included in the LL and LL-D columns. I do not know if there are future plans to make PRP columns?