Strategic Double Clicking - Page 153

Madpoo · 2018-03-17, 21:21

First the personal news... I start a new job next week which means I'll no longer be doing any LL testing of my own (no machines to do them on). So, that's unfortunate, but I'm really looking forward to the new job.

And now an updated list of strategic double-checks.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	worktodo
47910329	3	0	1	DoubleCheck=47910329,73,1
49944289	2	1	1	DoubleCheck=49944289,73,1
51499661	3	3	2	DoubleCheck=51499661,73,1
51499697	3	3	2	DoubleCheck=51499697,73,1
53526397	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=53526397,73,1
57871409	1	1	5	DoubleCheck=57871409,74,1
45084211	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=45084211,73,1
49978301	1	0	2	DoubleCheck=49978301,73,1
50751427	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=50751427,73,1
50751461	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=50751461,73,1
53524927	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=53524927,73,1
50133971	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=50133971,73,1
47825693	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=47825693,73,1
50072713	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=50072713,73,1
54362201	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=54362201,73,1
56452489	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=56452489,73,1
47206573	2	2	5	DoubleCheck=47206573,73,1
50411227	2	2	5	DoubleCheck=50411227,73,1
50413729	2	2	5	DoubleCheck=50413729,73,1
50476709	2	2	5	DoubleCheck=50476709,73,1
48066199	9	9	1	DoubleCheck=48066199,73,1
51795853	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=51795853,73,1
56793833	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=56793833,73,1
56793901	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=56793901,73,1
56793911	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=56793911,73,1
57767273	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=57767273,74,1
57770731	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=57770731,74,1
57770737	1	0	7	DoubleCheck=57770737,74,1
47796143	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=47796143,73,1
48050089	3	3	2	DoubleCheck=48050089,73,1
47190991	2	2	1	DoubleCheck=47190991,73,1
46988021	1	0	1	DoubleCheck=46988021,73,1
53432707	1	1	5	DoubleCheck=53432707,73,1
46545523	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=46545523,73,1
53669309	3	3	5	DoubleCheck=53669309,73,1
53714671	3	3	5	DoubleCheck=53714671,73,1
53750771	3	3	5	DoubleCheck=53750771,73,1
56107043	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=56107043,73,1
56107063	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=56107063,73,1
47740151	1	1	3	DoubleCheck=47740151,73,1
49200581	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=49200581,73,1
47471857	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=47471857,73,1
47697583	1	1	2	DoubleCheck=47697583,73,1
47747389	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=47747389,73,1
53183287	1	1	7	DoubleCheck=53183287,73,1
46056631	1	1	4	DoubleCheck=46056631,73,1
47930731	2	3	4	DoubleCheck=47930731,73,1
54936641	5	8	2	DoubleCheck=54936641,73,1
54946123	5	8	2	DoubleCheck=54946123,73,1
49924159	3	5	1	DoubleCheck=49924159,73,1
55747099	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747099,73,1
55747343	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747343,73,1
55747357	6	10	4	DoubleCheck=55747357,73,1
50713477	3	6	3	DoubleCheck=50713477,73,1
51603451	3	6	3	DoubleCheck=51603451,73,1
51966151	3	6	3	DoubleCheck=51966151,73,1
52005761	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=52005761,73,1
55758323	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=55758323,73,1
49853917	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=49853917,73,1
51619987	1	2	3	DoubleCheck=51619987,73,1
51773599	1	2	3	DoubleCheck=51773599,73,1
55222553	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=55222553,73,1
47456807	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=47456807,73,1
54796771	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=54796771,73,1
47260907	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=47260907,73,1
47438639	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=47438639,73,1
51195761	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=51195761,73,1
51196139	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=51196139,73,1
54179299	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=54179299,73,1
54284707	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=54284707,73,1
54288601	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=54288601,73,1
56165099	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=56165099,73,1
54702017	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=54702017,73,1
50279329	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=50279329,73,1
55319449	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=55319449,73,1
55368239	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=55368239,73,1
55380077	1	2	4	DoubleCheck=55380077,73,1
46157077	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=46157077,73,1
46841513	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=46841513,73,1
47153539	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=47153539,73,1
55557907	2	4	2	DoubleCheck=55557907,73,1
55560851	2	4	2	DoubleCheck=55560851,73,1
47569001	2	4	2	DoubleCheck=47569001,73,1
50740717	2	4	2	DoubleCheck=50740717,73,1
51956159	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=51956159,73,1
54868139	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54868139,73,1
54872569	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54872569,73,1
54872897	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54872897,73,1
54877321	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54877321,73,1
54896599	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54896599,73,1
54897449	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54897449,73,1
54923017	1	2	13	DoubleCheck=54923017,73,1
55357663	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55357663,73,1
55358543	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55358543,73,1
55358627	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55358627,73,1
55363993	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55363993,73,1
55364051	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55364051,73,1
55364737	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=55364737,73,1
56053957	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=56053957,73,1
56073779	1	2	14	DoubleCheck=56073779,73,1

VBCurtis · 2018-03-17, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

First the personal news... I start a new job next week which means I'll no longer be doing any LL testing of my own (no machines to do them on). So, that's unfortunate, but I'm really looking forward to the new job.

Congrats, sir! Best wishes on new challenges and improved professional satisfaction.

rudi_m · 2018-03-18, 03:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

First the personal news... I start a new job next week which means I'll no longer be doing any LL testing of my own (no machines to do them on).

Haven't you introduced your successor how to continue the most important task of your job?

Quote:

And now an updated list of strategic double-checks.

Please forgive me I just took them all. Should be done in 40 days.

Madpoo · 2018-03-18, 04:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by rudi_m

Haven't you introduced your successor how to continue the most important task of your job?

LOL... alas, no. All of the people taking over for me are more cloud-focused and they probably think my collection of (gasp!) physical servers is archaic.

They'll be working to move those server functions to the cloud anyway.

Maybe when they decommission them I can pick them up at a bargain and setup my own server farm.

GP2 · 2018-03-19, 14:25

If you want to keep just a few LL tests running, try the cloud.

With c5.large spot instances on AWS, the cost fluctuates but currently it's about $2.50 to $3.00 per week per core.

ixfd64 · 2018-03-19, 18:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

First the personal news... I start a new job next week which means I'll no longer be doing any LL testing of my own (no machines to do them on). So, that's unfortunate, but I'm really looking forward to the new job.

Similar situation here. I changed jobs last year, and as much as I love my new job, the company I currently work at is fairly small doesn't have many spare computers I could use. I miss being able to contribute 300 GHz-days per day. :-(

ATH · 2018-03-19, 18:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by GP2

If you want to keep just a few LL tests running, try the cloud.

With c5.large spot instances on AWS, the cost fluctuates but currently it's about $2.50 to $3.00 per week per core.

PRP on 75M-76M takes 16-18 days so $6-$7. LL on 48M takes ~ 5.5 days so about $2.1

chalsall · 2018-03-19, 18:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATH

PRP on 75M-76M takes 16-18 days so $6-$7. LL on 48M takes ~ 5.5 days so about $2.1

Unless you get "free electricity" (its not really free, but sometimes it's paid for by someone else) every single test we do costs money.

ATH · 2018-03-19, 19:27

Yes, I was not complaining about the cost, I was just showing what the cost of a c5.large was in terms of PRP and LL different sized exponents instead of cost per week.
Cost per week does not tell you that, if you do not know how long exponents takes on a c5.large.

I'm probably one of the last people here to think I finish any exponents for free with my high electricity cost:
My 8 core finishes a 75-76M in about 60 hours.
For $6 I get roughly 15 KWh or 54 MJ and to use that in 60 hours I could use 250W constantly. I'm not sure how much by 8 core computer uses since I run LL test on the graphic card as well, but it is probably not that much lower than that, so my cost at home is in the ballpark of the c5.large, just faster completion.

storm5510 · 2018-03-20, 14:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

First the personal news... I start a new job next week which means I'll no longer be doing any LL testing of my own (no machines to do them on). So, that's unfortunate, but I'm really looking forward to the new job.

Good luck with the new job!

petrw1 · 2018-03-24, 04:03

Code:

Top DC

Rank  Member Name  Total GHz Days  Attempts  Successes  90 day  30 day  7 day  1 day
19     ksteczk  35696.147                  420     418    4928  5983  6114  6148

He seems to have access to a LOT!!! of computers.

WELCOME and

YEE HAW!!!

2018-03-24, 04:03	#1683
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3·5·307 Posts	Wow is this guy moving!!!! Code: Top DC Rank Member Name Total GHz Days Attempts Successes 90 day 30 day 7 day 1 day 19 ksteczk 35696.147 420 418 4928 5983 6114 6148 He seems to have access to a LOT!!! of computers. WELCOME and YEE HAW!!! Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2018-03-24 at 04:04

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic	Mysticial	Software	51	2021-04-18 18:12
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page	marigonzes	Information & Answers	2	2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th?	jasong	jasong	7	2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1?	137ben	PrimeNet	6	2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume.	Uncwilly	Puzzles	8	2006-07-03 16:02

2018-03-19, 14:25	#1677
GP2 Sep 2003 A1C₁₆ Posts	If you want to keep just a few LL tests running, try the cloud. With c5.large spot instances on AWS, the cost fluctuates but currently it's about $2.50 to $3.00 per week per core.

2018-03-19, 19:27	#1681
ATH Einyen Dec 2003 Denmark 3,079 Posts	Yes, I was not complaining about the cost, I was just showing what the cost of a c5.large was in terms of PRP and LL different sized exponents instead of cost per week. Cost per week does not tell you that, if you do not know how long exponents takes on a c5.large. I'm probably one of the last people here to think I finish any exponents for free with my high electricity cost: My 8 core finishes a 75-76M in about 60 hours. For $6 I get roughly 15 KWh or 54 MJ and to use that in 60 hours I could use 250W constantly. I'm not sure how much by 8 core computer uses since I run LL test on the graphic card as well, but it is probably not that much lower than that, so my cost at home is in the ballpark of the c5.large, just faster completion.