mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-09-21, 00:05   #639
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

22·647 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
I managed to run my own double check by mistake. I forgot to check them:
http://mersenne.org/M44356541

If anyone got time at some point to do another run.
I will run it.
GP2 is offline  
Old 2017-10-08, 17:49   #640
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

22×647 Posts
Default

Some triple checks where Madpoo mismatched the first test. His result is almost certainly correct.

Anyone want these?

DoubleCheck=54515387,73,1
DoubleCheck=54556591,73,1
DoubleCheck=55096187,73,1
DoubleCheck=55239377,73,1
DoubleCheck=55633247,73,1
DoubleCheck=55866413,73,1
DoubleCheck=56035241,73,1
DoubleCheck=57031193,73,1
DoubleCheck=57076309,73,1
DoubleCheck=58156037,73,1
DoubleCheck=58996009,73,1
DoubleCheck=59086387,73,1
DoubleCheck=59095571,73,1
DoubleCheck=59108381,73,1
GP2 is offline  
Old 2017-10-08, 19:16   #641
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

3×977 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
Some triple checks where Madpoo mismatched the first test. His result is almost certainly correct.

Anyone want these?

DoubleCheck=54515387,73,1
DoubleCheck=54556591,73,1
DoubleCheck=55096187,73,1
DoubleCheck=55239377,73,1
DoubleCheck=55633247,73,1
DoubleCheck=55866413,73,1
DoubleCheck=56035241,73,1
DoubleCheck=57031193,73,1
DoubleCheck=57076309,73,1
DoubleCheck=58156037,73,1
DoubleCheck=58996009,73,1
DoubleCheck=59086387,73,1
DoubleCheck=59095571,73,1
DoubleCheck=59108381,73,1
Queued.
Mark Rose is offline  
Old 2017-10-09, 03:24   #642
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

37·89 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
Some triple checks where Madpoo mismatched the first test. His result is almost certainly correct.
...
Thanks for spotting those. I block out my own results when looking for mismatches to run...I forget about the ones I've done strategic double-checking on and got mismatches. Of course, I assume mine are right, so...
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-10-18, 16:27   #643
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

37·89 Posts
Default quad check needed

These are always fun...

M45075623
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-10-18, 19:49   #644
moebius
 
moebius's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Germany

19×29 Posts
Smile

This one is funny too...
45305951
moebius is offline  
Old 2017-11-06, 16:34   #645
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

1100110111012 Posts
Default triple (and a quad) checks available

These 4 tests need a triple (and 44611877 needs a quad) check... I did one of the tests already.

Code:
DoubleCheck=42051857,72,1
DoubleCheck=44611877,72,1
DoubleCheck=56713931,73,1
DoubleCheck=68842393,75,1
No rush, since I'm pretty sure mine is correct, but just in case anyone felt like finishing those off.
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-11-07, 01:29   #646
rudi_m
 
rudi_m's Avatar
 
Jul 2005

18210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
These 4 tests need a triple (and 44611877 needs a quad) check...
I've queued them.
rudi_m is offline  
Old 2017-11-13, 10:52   #647
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

1010000111002 Posts
Default

Can someone poach M47092121 and complete the triple check quickly?

Code:
AdvancedTest=47092121
This is the first LL test I ran on the new c5 instance type on AWS, and it didn't match the first-time test.

The trouble is, this wasn't a strategic double check. The machine that did the first-time check has no prior bad results (although it has only two verified results, in the 26M and 27M ranges).

On the c4 instance type there have been no bad results out of a few thousand, so I hope this is a coincidence and not some bug or problem with c5 or mprime.

There was one unusual thing I did during the run of this exponent: I suspended the Linux process with kill -s SIGSTOP in order to run some tests on Mlucas and then resumed it with kill -s SIGCONT. I think I did that on c4 instances a few times in the past without any harmful effects.
GP2 is offline  
Old 2017-11-13, 16:08   #648
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

37×89 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP2 View Post
Can someone poach M47092121 and complete the triple check quickly?
...
This is the first LL test I ran on the new c5 instance type on AWS, and it didn't match the first-time test.

The trouble is, this wasn't a strategic double check. The machine that did the first-time check has no prior bad results (although it has only two verified results, in the 26M and 27M ranges).
I wouldn't worry about it, your result is probably fine. The strategic stuff is only a best guess anyway. While it's true in general that past performance predicts future results, there are exceptions... good past results may wind up with bad results for any # of reasons (memory flaked out, the user decided to try an overclock, heat wave, etc). And vice versa... bad results galore, and then the user fixed something and now they're rock solid.

I've run into quite a few of those myself where I didn't match either previous result (leading to the need for quad checks) and nothing really stood out about the past performance of either system.
Madpoo is offline  
Old 2017-11-13, 20:18   #649
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

22·647 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
I wouldn't worry about it, your result is probably fine.
Way too much of a coincidence for my liking. We'll see. I'm now double-checking a bunch of other exponents that were tested by that user/computer.
GP2 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double checks casmith789 PrimeNet 7 2015-05-26 00:53
Help doing some quadrup1e+ checks Madpoo Data 28 2015-04-06 17:01
Double checks Rastus Data 1 2003-12-19 18:20
How do I get rid of the Triple Checks?? outlnder Lounge 4 2003-04-07 18:06
Double-checks come in pairs? BigRed Software 1 2002-10-20 05:29

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:35.

Thu Apr 22 23:35:54 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 18:16, 0 users, load averages: 1.39, 1.64, 1.86

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.