mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic couple and dribble checks (PRP's, P-1's, and special Certs too)
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2023-01-04, 17:44 #12 Jan S   Oct 2018 Slovakia 3×43 Posts 503021377 CERT unsuccessful, "Proof file was not valid".
2023-01-27, 23:28   #13
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2·4,079 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly George, what is the path forward for this exponent?
No choice but to rerun a full PRP test. It sucks that the 2 large proofs with residues sitting on a network share failed. I'm not sure if it was the network share, the proof power multiplier, or the failed last step in creating the proof that was responsible.

2023-01-29, 02:33   #14
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

10,891 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by sdbardwick I could do some of the strategic DCs, but I'm afraid of getting yelled at for being inefficient, as I'd do them as LLDC, not PRP.
George says there is a 60% of mismatches. That is a huge amount. A LL DC just to invoke a probable TC seems unwise.

2023-01-29, 19:50   #15
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

11111110111102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly George says there is a 60% of mismatches. That is a huge amount. A LL DC just to invoke a probable TC seems unwise.
Yes, see https://www.mersenne.org/report_LL/?...mmanuel&fac=-1

I'll take:

PRP=1,2,82987271,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,85430369,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,85505279,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,85613329,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,85660387,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,86088547,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,86306141,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,86500871,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,86628497,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,86802169,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,87105727,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,87440053,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,87805027,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,88260703,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,88503689,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,88722407,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,89340523,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,89597569,-1,76,0
PRP=1,2,89692549,-1,76,0

P.S. The other user is: https://www.mersenne.org/report_LL/?...oAurora&fac=-1

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2023-01-29 at 20:01

 2023-01-29, 23:08 #16 moebius     Jul 2009 Germany 29F16 Posts I have 1 unverified PRP-Result 88326319 https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...8326319&full=1 This one is still from my old Phenom 955 processor, which had 39 Bad LL-Tests. Maybe worth of double checking. RESULTS from me 233 Verified PRP test results 2 Factored PRP test results 70 Unverified-Reliable PRP test results' 306 Verified LL test results 8 Factored LL test results 34 Unverified LL test results 43 Bad LL test results Last fiddled with by moebius on 2023-01-29 at 23:26
2023-01-30, 00:45   #17
sdbardwick

Aug 2002
North San Diego County

22·3·67 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose I have only two unverified LL results. They're very likely good, but it would be nice to "finish" my LL work if anyone feels so kind as to verify them. Both have been appropriately TF'ed and thanks to the DC P-1 effort, well P-1'ed. DoubleCheck=83640149,76,1 DoubleCheck=83640637,76,1
Registered and queued up.
ETC 2/1 and 2/4.

2023-01-30, 00:48   #18
sdbardwick

Aug 2002
North San Diego County

11001001002 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ric Requesting another TC (again, LL only, please) for this one: Code: DoubleCheck=64687741,75,1 TIA
Registered and queued.
ETC 2/1.

2023-01-30, 00:52   #19
sdbardwick

Aug 2002
North San Diego County

22·3·67 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly George says there is a 60% of mismatches. That is a huge amount. A LL DC just to invoke a probable TC seems unwise.
Agreed, such a high probability of a TC means LL definitely not appropriate here.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Madpoo Marin's Mersenne-aries 1841 2019-07-16 03:30 fivemack NFS@Home 1 2014-11-30 07:52 theshark Information & Answers 21 2014-08-30 17:36 Optics Information & Answers 8 2009-04-25 18:23 PHinker Software 3 2004-12-18 17:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:53.

Tue Jan 31 12:53:41 UTC 2023 up 166 days, 10:22, 0 users, load averages: 1.17, 1.08, 1.01