![]() |
![]() |
#2091 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
23·653 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2092 | |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·3·7·281 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Now base 313 is complete to >= 120 digits. :-) I'm a little confused on why having 2 or more sequences terminate in a cycle for a base would predict additional terminations for a base, whether they be cycle or otherwise. It seems there is much randomness in all sequences after small factors work their way through the first few indexes. It seems like trying to predict where a huge prime will occur. Regardless, I'm still happy to search things on the offhand chance that such patterns can be found. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2093 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2·3·7·281 Posts |
![]()
317^8 merges at index=2830 with 36468:i22.
Now 4 terminations and 2 merges for the 120-digit effort. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2094 | |
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
107710 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I just find it very surprising that for all the bases that are prime numbers, there are only endings of sequences on cycles of the same length. And as I suppose that this is a coincidence, I would like to confirm it by finding for example for the base 313 an end of sequence on a cycle of length other than 2. This is the expected result : randomness. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2095 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
23×653 Posts |
![]()
Another:
103^40:i1329 merges with 27916:i5 BTW, Jean-Luc, I just thought I'd mention that I'm using your latest OE_3000000_C80.txt to find these. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2096 |
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
65910 Posts |
![]()
Is base 88 still reserved? It would be the next on my list to take.
Otherwise I take 89 and following bases. I need more food for my volunteers ;) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2097 | ||
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
3·359 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It is much better to use the latest version, even if the probability of error remains low with the old version, it is not zero. Quote:
Base 88 is always reserved. So I reserve base 89 for you and the following ones (opposite parities). Up to which base do you want to reserve ? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2098 |
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
659 Posts |
![]()
I'll take bases 89 90 91 92 93 94.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2099 |
Jun 2013
1478 Posts |
![]()
I have found the downdriver on 92^61 just this morning.
@yoyo: could you please leave this sequence to me? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2100 |
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
659 Posts |
![]()
Yes, let this sequence stay at your side.
I'll take additionally 95 96 97 99. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2101 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
23×653 Posts |
![]()
Base 103 is completed - all opens >=120 digits.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Broken aliquot sequences | fivemack | FactorDB | 46 | 2021-02-21 10:46 |
Broken aliquot sequences | schickel | FactorDB | 18 | 2013-06-12 16:09 |
A new theorem about aliquot sequences | garambois | Aliquot Sequences | 34 | 2012-06-10 21:53 |
poaching aliquot sequences... | Andi47 | FactorDB | 21 | 2011-12-29 21:11 |
New article on aliquot sequences | schickel | mersennewiki | 0 | 2008-12-30 07:07 |