![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
22·463 Posts |
![]()
This is what I was worried about. It got to ~40 million relations and I end up with this:
Code:
found 5162005 hash collisions in 40464281 relations added 23 free relations commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 found 4490571 duplicates and 35973733 unique relations memory use: 197.2 MB reading ideals above 720000 commencing singleton removal, initial pass memory use: 1378.0 MB reading all ideals from disk memory use: 1282.0 MB keeping 45221428 ideals with weight <= 200, target excess is 191371 commencing in-memory singleton removal begin with 35973733 relations and 45221428 unique ideals reduce to 4321 relations and 0 ideals in 17 passes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
240418 Posts |
![]()
If you reduced them to ashes, then it might be over-sieved? Try again without some thousand lines, it may help. I remember I have seen a discussion about this in the past. It never happened to me, however, so I am not sure.
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2014-03-04 at 16:08 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Sep 2009
52×97 Posts |
![]()
To judge by the last line:
Code:
reduce to 4321 relations and 0 ideals in 17 passes Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Jun 2003
22×32×151 Posts |
![]()
With a 29/30 combination, you'd need about 55M unique relations. Right now you have 35M. Add another 20-25M relations before retrying for a matrix. Keep adding 5M relations until you succeed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
34748 Posts |
![]()
Thanks everybody. I'll report back with any new results.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
22·463 Posts |
![]()
Hasn't completed yet, but it looks much better with more relations:
Code:
reduce to 13949767 relations and 14732971 ideals in 29 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 96 filtering wants 1000000 more relations |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
22×463 Posts |
![]()
Thanks for pointing those out.
Also, the number I was working on ended up needing between 52M and 55M (I set minrels to 55M and it worked--at 52M, it needed more). Last fiddled with by wombatman on 2014-03-06 at 18:11 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
22×463 Posts |
![]()
Currently working on an SNFS 206. Now at over 65M relations (54.5M unique) and getting:
Code:
begin with 14655138 relations and 16282704 unique ideals reduce to 13932177 relations and 15555212 ideals in 24 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 184 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
178F16 Posts |
![]()
I assume that isn't the first pass of singleton removal. You are close but aren't quite there yet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
22×463 Posts |
![]()
Good deal. That was from the "in-memory singleton removal" step, so yes, I believe you're correct.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passive Pascal | Xyzzy | GPU Computing | 1 | 2017-05-17 20:22 |
Tesla P100 — 5.4 DP TeraFLOPS — Pascal | Mark Rose | GPU Computing | 52 | 2016-07-02 12:11 |
Nvidia Pascal, a third of DP | firejuggler | GPU Computing | 12 | 2016-02-23 06:55 |
Calculating perfect numbers in Pascal | Elhueno | Homework Help | 5 | 2008-06-12 16:37 |
Factorization attempt to a c163 - a new Odd Perfect Number roadblock | jchein1 | Factoring | 30 | 2005-05-30 14:43 |