Other Factordb Problems - Page 54

Stargate38 · 2022-11-10, 15:17

I send Syd an e-mail about restoring the numbers that used the % operator. Hopefully he does so.

LaurV · 2022-11-10, 15:19

Removing that %25 has nothing to do with factorDB, but with how links are parsed, the % is used to insert special characters (like space, comma, slash, etc) in links, and probably, it is parsed correctly.

Stargate38 · 2022-11-10, 15:24

I'm talking about broken links, like this one: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000835451351 (it should output ((2^607-5393219031728128)/10^16) mod (10^161), but comes up blank). Why did Syd remove them?

frmky · 2022-11-10, 16:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stargate38

I'm talking about broken links, like this one: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000835451351 (it should output ((2^607-5393219031728128)/10^16) mod (10^161), but comes up blank). Why did Syd remove them?

Perhaps it was reindexed? The new entry says it was created a couple of days ago.
http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000003950159299

Happy5214 · 2022-11-25, 13:28

I was the one who initially brought the issue regarding the modulo operator (and the related buggy entries) to Markus's attention back in June. But his response at the time seemed to indicate that he was going to try to fix the term optimizer, delete buggy entries, and keep the ultimately fixed modulo operator, rather than remove the modulo operator altogether. But surely there are better (and less redundant) ways to represent these numbers than with the modulo operator, right?

EdH · 2022-11-28, 16:45

Well this is annoying! If I upload a large .elf, my reward is a 60-minute Time-Out!"

Stargate38 · 2022-12-31, 00:40

It seems that the DB has been flooded with a ton of numbers in the 63-71 digit range. They're slowing down the PRP workers so that numbers that would normally be proven automatically (i.e. <300 digits) are stuck as PRPs. Unfortunately, the DB doesn't support certificate submission for such smaller PRPs.

EdH · 2022-12-31, 19:57

Here are a couple of interesting entries. Both are PRP by status and both have Primo certificates:

~~[url]http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000003971607134[/url]~~ Fixed?
http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00003766500498

sweety439 · 2023-01-01, 02:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

Here are a couple of interesting entries. Both are PRP by status and both have Primo certificates:

~~[url]http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000003971607134[/url]~~ Fixed?
http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00003766500498

Also http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000801122579

YuL · 2023-01-03, 08:59

((2^4459-1)*2^4458+1)/7492772347 (2675 digits) appears as PRP but has a verified certificate.

sweety439 · 2023-01-03, 10:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdH

http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00003766500498

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweety439

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000801122579

Quote:

Originally Posted by YuL

((2^4459-1)*2^4458+1)/7492772347

Well, can Markus fix them?

2022-11-10, 15:24	#586
Stargate38 "Daniel Jackson" May 2011 14285714285714285714 3×251 Posts	I'm talking about broken links, like this one: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000835451351 (it should output ((2^607-5393219031728128)/10^16) mod (10^161), but comes up blank). Why did Syd remove them? Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 2022-11-10 at 15:27

2022-12-31, 19:57	#591
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 12207₈ Posts	Here are a couple of interesting entries. Both are PRP by status and both have Primo certificates: ~~[url]http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000003971607134[/url]~~ Fixed? http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00003766500498 Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-12-31 at 23:51

2023-01-03, 08:59	#593
YuL Feb 2012 Paris, France 2·3⁴ Posts	PRP or P ((2^4459-1)*2^4458+1)/7492772347 (2675 digits) appears as PRP but has a verified certificate.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A suggestion for factordb.	enzocreti	FactorDB	24	2022-11-17 07:20
Extending Factordb	carpetpool	FactorDB	6	2017-01-23 11:04
FactorDB PRP's	smh	FactorDB	231	2015-07-28 02:30
bugged sequence in factordb	firejuggler	Aliquot Sequences	2	2010-06-15 14:03
FactorDB question	Raman	Factoring	15	2010-01-28 10:24

2022-11-10, 15:17	#584
Stargate38 "Daniel Jackson" May 2011 14285714285714285714 3·251 Posts	I send Syd an e-mail about restoring the numbers that used the % operator. Hopefully he does so.

2022-11-10, 15:19	#585
LaurV Romulan Interpreter "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 3×23×149 Posts	Removing that %25 has nothing to do with factorDB, but with how links are parsed, the % is used to insert special characters (like space, comma, slash, etc) in links, and probably, it is parsed correctly.

2022-11-25, 13:28	#588
Happy5214 "Alexander" Nov 2008 The Alamo City 1110011001₂ Posts	I was the one who initially brought the issue regarding the modulo operator (and the related buggy entries) to Markus's attention back in June. But his response at the time seemed to indicate that he was going to try to fix the term optimizer, delete buggy entries, and keep the ultimately fixed modulo operator, rather than remove the modulo operator altogether. But surely there are better (and less redundant) ways to represent these numbers than with the modulo operator, right?

2022-11-28, 16:45	#589
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 5×1,051 Posts	Well this is annoying! If I upload a large .elf, my reward is a 60-minute Time-Out!"

2022-12-31, 00:40	#590
Stargate38 "Daniel Jackson" May 2011 14285714285714285714 3·251 Posts	It seems that the DB has been flooded with a ton of numbers in the 63-71 digit range. They're slowing down the PRP workers so that numbers that would normally be proven automatically (i.e. <300 digits) are stuck as PRPs. Unfortunately, the DB doesn't support certificate submission for such smaller PRPs.