![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
May 2022
710 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
421010 Posts |
![]() Quote:
For k*b^n+c you have to write your own. What k,b,n and c are you trying to test? Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2022-05-01 at 23:41 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
24×5×13 Posts |
![]()
You can manually enter something like PRP=N/A,7,17,112108343,17 into worktodo.txt. This will test \(7\cdot{}17^{112{,}108{,}343}+17\). So the format is PRP=N/A,k,b,n,c.
Last fiddled with by kruoli on 2022-05-02 at 10:21 Reason: Fixed formula. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
2·5·421 Posts |
![]() Quote:
c must be -1 or +1 for any sizable number to be provable. The real point here is that testing should be done by using the 2^p-1 server. Trial factoring will have been done and sometimes P-1. The chance of claiming the prize money for a 100,000,000 digit prime is very small. It s far better for a new comer to join the herd and crunch a wavefront number -- "World Record Prime" -- and hope for a lesser monetary prize yet plenty of fame. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
24·5·13 Posts |
![]()
Of course it is divisible by 17. It was only an example.
Yes, this way we can only prove compositeness, and yes, for reaching the goal of a 100 million digit prime, I would also suggest using the PrimeNet assignment system and according candidates. Yes, I would also recommend our "normal" wavefront work, but we can only suggest things and do not force anyone. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
May 2022
7 Posts |
![]()
Today this possible prime number can not be validated in prime95, it has an n of more than one integer, there I leave it for the future or for someone who knows how to check this numbers =)
The possible prime is: (2^3486784401) + 3486784401 I have a theory that: 2^3 + 3 = 11 is prime 2^(3^4) + (3^4) = 2^81 + 81 = 2417851639229258349412433 is prime 2^((3^4)^5) + ((3^4)^5) = (2^3486784401) + 3486784401 = ? or 2^(3^(4^5)) + (3^(4^5)) = 2^373391848741020043532959754184866588225409776783734007750636931722079\ 04061726525122999368893880397722046876506543147515810872705459216085858\ 13513369828091873141917485942625809388070199519564042855718180410466812\ 88797402925517668012340617298396574731619152386723046235125934896058590\ 58828465479354050593620237654780744273058214452705898875625145281779341\ 33521419207446230275187291854328623757370639854853194764169262638199728\ 87006907013899256524297198527698749274196276811060702333710356481 + 37339184874102004353295975418486658822540977678373400775063693172207904\ 06172652512299936889388039772204687650654314751581087270545921608585813\ 51336982809187314191748594262580938807019951956404285571818041046681288\ 79740292551766801234061729839657473161915238672304623512593489605859058\ 82846547935405059362023765478074427305821445270589887562514528177934133\ 52141920744623027518729185432862375737063985485319476416926263819972887\ 006907013899256524297198527698749274196276811060702333710356481 = ? This theory is complicated to prove hahahahah Pérez Sánchez, Pablo apzyx@yahoo.com 03/05/2022 Last fiddled with by retina on 2022-05-03 at 01:00 Reason: Pointless long numbers chopped into manageable segments |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Mar 2019
2·139 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Your theory has no mathematical basis, other than that the progression is true for 2 terms. As such, I doubt you'll find much interest here in trying to test it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Apr 2020
13558 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
9,973 Posts |
![]()
[offtopic]
You were not seeing things, that's a long time known joke from Mike, for the new users before their first posts being approved or so, the numbers of posts being shown is an arbitrary large number. After that, the counting resumes properly. I think Unc knows that, but she is playing with you ![]() [/offtopic] Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2022-05-05 at 10:49 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
9,973 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
100000100002 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Presentation | Thecmaster | GPU to 72 | 6 | 2019-03-22 07:21 |
mersenne prime number application? | Tamay82 | Information & Answers | 3 | 2018-09-08 16:34 |
Torture and Benchmarking test of Prome95.Doubts in implementation | paramveer | Information & Answers | 32 | 2012-01-15 06:05 |
anyone seen this presentation? | ixfd64 | Factoring | 9 | 2010-09-21 19:39 |
my first research paper presentation | ixfd64 | Lounge | 2 | 2004-11-05 23:42 |