![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
2,467 Posts |
![]()
OK, I may have found a bug with version 25.7.
I allocated 32 MB of memory for daytime and nighttime use, and Prime95 still complained about getting only 8 MB. Edit: There seems to be another major problem. I added "UseV4=1" to the prime.txt file, but it gets removed every time I run Prime95. It's a good thing I didn't replace version 24.14 with 25.7 yet. Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2008-10-12 at 01:56 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Aug 2002
North San Diego County
2·367 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by sdbardwick on 2008-10-12 at 04:55 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
2,467 Posts |
![]()
I'm running Vista on that computer, but I'm not using the Program Files folder.
For some reaosn, Prime95 still thinks I'm using v5. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Aug 2002
Ann Arbor, MI
433 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Dec 2003
23×33 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If you want to handle ACPI in Linux, please have a look at thermal management as well. I'd like mprime to throttle down when the CPU temperature gets within one or two K from the critical point where the computer slows down or suspends to protect itself, or even an option to keep the CPU at a configurable temperature by dymaically changing the throttling value. This is useful to keep fan noise on workstations at an acceptable level. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
3,733 Posts |
![]()
Still having big problems with Prime95 having memory allocation errors and paring itself down to ~500MB for P-1 (even though 2GB+ is available).
Also, I think I mentioned it before, but it would be useful to have menu option (both main window menu and system tray icon menu) to temporarily restrict to low-memory mode. The LowMemWhileRunning setting is great, but every now and then I may run into a program or situation that wasn't pre-configured for low-mem, but I want to force low-mem mode. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1EE316 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,907 Posts |
![]()
Never mind. What looked promising has started to fail. I really don't know what's going on. I call malloc and get a NULL back when I'm well below the system's physical memory according to task manager.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | ||
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
E9516 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() See attachment. Set Prime95 to allow up to 2400MB. Used memory before starting was 1.22GB, the peak cutoff point was 3.05GB for both failed attempts. After this I reset the settings to use 1800MB, Prime95 elected to use 1765MB which put the system memory usage (according to Task Manager) at 3.09GB and it's running just fine. edit: Quote:
![]() Doesn't help you, but I feel less dumb now ![]() Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2008-10-12 at 22:13 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22·1,627 Posts |
![]()
Could it be a fragmentation problem? I'm just saying because I have experienced this in the past. The OS was unable to find any contiguous memory segment large enough to satisfy my request. The only solutions I found were to either deallocate the offending bits of memory strewn about the address space or to quit and restart the process.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | ||
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
373310 Posts |
![]()
Small observation: Prime95 notes:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prime95 version 27.3 | Prime95 | Software | 148 | 2012-03-18 19:24 |
Prime95 version 26.3 | Prime95 | Software | 76 | 2010-12-11 00:11 |
Prime95 version 25.5 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 369 | 2008-02-26 05:21 |
Prime95 version 25.4 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 143 | 2007-09-24 21:01 |
When the next prime95 version ? | pacionet | Software | 74 | 2006-12-07 20:30 |