20110703, 00:19  #1 
Jun 2011
Henlopen Acres, Delaware
7·19 Posts 
What are your periteration times?
I am just curious about what some of your periteration times might be.
M 46,878,773 = 0.024 for me. 
20110703, 00:41  #2 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
2^{6}×131 Posts 
I'm doing 2 double checks of ll I think and my minimum I can see so far is .078 I'm not sure if they are double checks or not.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 20110703 at 00:42 
20110703, 02:33  #3 
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts 
3040msec on M24,262,141....Liquid Nitrogen has a relatively "hot" machine.....

20110703, 06:07  #4 
Apr 2009
Venice, Chased by Jaws
1010111_{2} Posts 
My machines are a bit old, but out of curiosity for what others are able to output, I'll post what I can. I hope this is not simply a low brow "mine is bigger than yours" thread. In today's age of computers, your unit will be blown away eventually by what I replace it with when the time comes.
I had four machines (now three, since two weeks ago  one TF and now P1 for GIMPS, the rest SoB). Three are Intel Core 2 class. Depending on the system's resource allocation and relative "cleanliness", I get: Core2 6300 @ 1.86: LL ~0.059 19913348, 19913348 (moved now to GIMPS P1 & LL  47907107  timings, soon to come) Core2 4300 @ 1.80: LL ~0.080 19880194. Not currently running (too hot, even with a laptop fan cooler  used as a heater during winter  thanks HP!): AMD Mobile K10 X2 RM72: LL ~.110 19913348. 
20110703, 08:21  #5 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
5B2_{16} Posts 
M28865407 (1536K FFT) > 0.010  0.011 msec/iter (using two cores of a slightly OCed i5750  timing fluctuations are due to variations in the type of work done by the other two cores: e.g., if I use both of them to P1 testing, I get 0.011 msec/iter; if I switch one of them to TF I normally get 0.010.

20110703, 15:08  #6  
Jun 2011
Henlopen Acres, Delaware
7×19 Posts 
Quote:
:) It's an overclocked i7870 @ 3.9 GHz. This is my "spare system," it has single core speed that is slightly faster than a stock Gulftown (i7980X @ 3.33 GHZ) 

20110703, 15:13  #7  
Jun 2011
Henlopen Acres, Delaware
7×19 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
It will be faster than whatever you can buy until the year 2018 or maybe longer. :) 

20110703, 16:36  #8 
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
C36_{16} Posts 
Use "PercentPrecision=6" in prime.txt then you get maximum precision and decimals on the milliseconds.

20110709, 19:36  #9 
Jun 2011
Henlopen Acres, Delaware
7·19 Posts 

20110709, 20:58  #10 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2^{2}×3×5×157 Posts 
TimingOutput=4 in prime.txt

20110710, 12:45  #11 
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
C36_{16} Posts 
Yeah sorry I forgot that there are 2 settings for precision, one for progress and one for timings. I have had those on since I started GIMPS. I should have checked undoc.txt before posting:
Code:
You can adjust how many decimal digits of precision are displayed in lines output to the screen. In prime.txt enter a value between 0 and 6: PercentPrecision=n You can alter the way the program outputs timings. In prime.txt set: TimingOutput=n Where n=1 for seconds with 3 digits of precision, n=2 for milliseconds with 1 digit of precision, n=3 for milliseconds with 2 digits of precision, n=4 for milliseconds with 3 digit of precision. Last fiddled with by ATH on 20110710 at 12:52 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Iteration times in i5 and i7  Jud McCranie  Information & Answers  53  20130817 19:09 
CPU frequency and iteration times.  rx7350  Hardware  12  20060508 21:54 
LLR.exe FFT crossovers and iteration times  SlashDude  15k Search  0  20040128 05:47 
slow iteration times  PLeopard  Hardware  9  20031029 05:48 
Slow iteration times with 23.7  smoffat  Software  13  20031022 22:50 